Should you invest in the construction industry The role of labor shortages & costs

Should you invest in the construction industry? The role of labor shortages & costs

Investment theme
Saxo Be Invested

Saxo Group

Construction has always been vital to economic growth, but the forces shaping the industry today look different. Labour shortages, rising material costs, and the slow advance of construction automation are putting pressure on traditional project models. For investors, construction no longer moves solely in predictable real estate cycles. It now reflects deeper structural shifts in supply chains, demographics, and regulatory frameworks.

As governments push for infrastructure renewal and cities continue expanding, demand remains steady. Yet higher costs, fewer skilled workers, and new environmental standards are making execution riskier. Construction continues to offer opportunities for resilient, long-term returns, but understanding where the sector is heading and what challenges could derail growth has never been more critical.

How big is the construction industry and why it matters

The construction industry represents a major pillar of the global economy, with the annual construction activity valued at over USD 15 trillion. That accounts for approximately 13% of global GDP, spanning residential, commercial, industrial, and infrastructure projects. In many national economies, especially emerging markets, construction provides critical employment opportunities and underpins broader economic development.

Infrastructure investment, in particular, remains a fundamental driver of long-term city growth and competitiveness. Roads, bridges, energy grids, and public transport networks do more than connect communities; they create essential conditions for trade, innovation, and capital investment. This is why infrastructure investment consistently ranks high in policy agendas aimed at strengthening economic resilience and urbanisation.

Globally, the construction industry is growing, but unevenly. Emerging economies are experiencing rapid expansion due to urbanisation and demographic shifts, while mature markets are growing at a slower, cyclical pace. Rising interest rates, inflationary pressures, and changing regulatory landscapes have introduced new uncertainties. Historically, construction activity tends to correlate strongly with economic cycles: downturns typically lead to delayed projects, tighter financing, and slower growth. This cyclical sensitivity makes construction market volatility a significant factor for investors to watch.

Recent years have highlighted these dynamics sharply. Pandemic-related shutdowns, followed by supply chain disruptions and inflationary spikes, triggered sharp swings in project timelines, material input costs, and demand forecasts. Although the construction sector has demonstrated resilience, it is still vulnerable to shifts in monetary policy, labour availability, and global supply chains. These factors continue to exert a direct and lasting influence on project pipelines, operating margins, and sector profitability.

Rising costs in construction: Materials and beyond

Construction costs have surged over the past years, driven by a combination of supply chain disruptions and persistent inflation across key inputs. Materials such as steel, concrete, and lumber have experienced sharp price increases. In the United States, for example, the Producer Price Index (PPI) for construction materials rose from 234.30 in April 2020 to 334.84 in March 2025—an increase of over 42%. While prices partially eased between late 2022 and 2024, they remain well above pre-pandemic levels and began rising again in early 2025.

The drivers behind rising construction costs are no longer limited to temporary shocks. Global energy prices, transportation bottlenecks, and geopolitical instability have all contributed to persistent input inflation. Beyond materials, contractors are also facing rising costs in insurance, project financing, and compliance—particularly for projects subject to environmental certifications or ESG-aligned building standards.

In response, developers and general contractors are rethinking how they manage cost risk. Fixed-price contracts are becoming less common, with a growing shift toward cost-plus or shared-risk structures. In some markets, there’s also a shift toward modular construction and prefabrication, both of which can reduce time on site and control costs. Nevertheless, the high volatility of input prices continues to disrupt traditional project budgeting, leading to delays or deferrals in capital commitments.

For investors, rising cost volatility reduces margin visibility and increases operational risk. There is often a lag between contract award and procurement, during which material price shifts can compress margins if not adequately hedged or contractually passed through. As a result, understanding how construction firms manage cost risk has become essential to evaluating sector exposure.

The impact of workforce shortages on project pipelines

Workforce shortages remain one of the most pressing challenges in the construction industry. A 2024 survey found that 75% of employers across 21 European countries reported difficulties in finding workers with the right skills, a significant increase from 42% in 2018. These shortages are especially severe in trades like masonry, carpentry, and electrical work—roles that are critical to timely project execution but increasingly difficult to staff as older workers retire and fewer new entrants join the field.

The labour gap is structural, not cyclical. The construction sector has struggled to replenish skill levels as the industry evolves toward more technology-intensive processes. Vocational training pipelines haven’t kept pace with industry needs, and policy changes across several EU countries have tightened access to migrant labour that previously helped balance domestic shortfalls.

These labour shortages are now affecting both the cost and predictability of project deliveries. Delays are increasingly attributed not to material issues or planning approvals but to a lack of on-site workers. In response, some developers are scaling down project sizes, extending delivery timelines, or shifting toward offsite construction methods. In high-demand regions, construction timelines are extending by several months, leading to increased financing and holding costs.

For investors, these dynamics introduce execution risks that are difficult to quantify and mitigate. Companies with reliable subcontractor networks, in-house training programmes, or early investments in automation are better positioned to manage labour constraints. Nonetheless, the shortage of skilled workers is likely to remain a structural headwind, influencing margins, timelines, and capital allocation across the sector.

Construction automation and robotics: A partial solution

Construction remains one of the least automated sectors, despite growing pressure to improve productivity and manage rising labour costs. While manufacturing has embraced robotics at scale, the construction industry continues to rely heavily on manual work.

Automation in construction includes technologies like autonomous machinery, robotic bricklaying, drone surveying, and 3D concrete printing. Adoption is gradually growing, particularly in large infrastructure projects across Europe, where pilot programmes have shortened timelines and reduced waste. However, most gains are still limited to early-stage activities, such as grading or excavation rather than specialised trades.

While autonomous construction robots can help relieve pressure on some labour-intensive tasks, they don’t replace skilled workers. Instead, they shift human roles toward supervision and precision tasks. Barriers like capital intensity and integration costs continue to limit adoption, especially among smaller firms.

Overall, automation is now becoming a differentiator. Firms investing in robotics and digital workflows tend to manage timelines more reliably and absorb fewer cost overruns. While not a complete fix for labour shortages, automation offers a strategic advantage in a tight labour market.

Is investing in construction companies a smart move today?

Investing in construction companies remains a viable strategy, but success depends on identifying companies that can manage current industry challenges. Investor interest is shifting away from broad sector exposure and toward firms with adaptive strategies and strong balance sheets.

Key traits investors are now prioritising include:

  • Diversified revenue streams. Companies working across multiple segments, such as infrastructure, logistics, and retrofitting, often face less volatility than those relying solely on speculative residential developments.
  • Strong cost management. In an environment of fluctuating material prices, firms with effective procurement strategies and lean operational models are better positioned to protect margins.
  • Robust project pipelines. A well-structured backlog, especially one anchored in public infrastructure or ESG-aligned development, provides visibility into future cash flows.
  • Operational resilience. Firms with strong subcontractor networks, prequalified suppliers, and digital workflows tend to handle disruption more efficiently.
  • Selective exposure to new construction. While new builds remain attractive in specific markets, overexposure in overheated segments can raise downside risks. Investors are increasingly cautious, favouring companies that balance new construction with renovation and infrastructure projects.

In summary, new construction can still be a good investment when approached through companies equipped to manage execution risks effectively.

Real estate development and construction: Where they intersect

Construction and real estate development are closely linked but follow different dynamics. While developers focus on land acquisition, planning, and market demand, construction firms are responsible for executing projects efficiently, translating design and financing into physical delivery. Their performance is deeply influenced by the timing, scope, and location of development cycles.

The real estate boom of 2020-22, fuelled by low interest rates and surging demand for new housing and logistics assets, boosted construction activity across many markets. However, rising borrowing costs, inflation, and tighter planning regulations have cooled momentum. As a result, construction pipelines are narrowing in some areas while shifting in others, particularly toward public infrastructure, energy-efficient retrofitting, and mixed-use urban projects.

This shift reinforces the need to evaluate construction exposure not simply through property prices but through the depth and durability of future demand. Projects tied to urbanisation, decarbonisation mandates, and logistics infrastructure may offer more stable returns than cyclical residential development. Construction companies embedded in these strategic corridors tend to provide more predictable earnings, especially in regions where housing policy and government-led investment are driving activity.

Environmental effects and risks for construction investors

Buildings account for approximately 42% of the EU’s total energy consumption and around 35% of its greenhouse gas emissions, making them the single largest energy-consuming sector in the region. While emissions from energy use in buildings have declined by approximately 34% between 2005 and 2022, mainly due to improved energy efficiency and the decarbonisation of heating systems, the construction sector remains under sustained scrutiny from regulators, policymakers, and institutional investors. These metrics underscore the urgency for the industry to align with EU climate goals and sustainable finance frameworks.

New standards and policies, such as the EU Taxonomy, the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD), and stricter ESG disclosure requirements, are reshaping project evaluation criteria. Projects that fail to align with these criteria may face higher financing costs, reputational risks, or exclusion from sustainable finance instruments. In response, developers and contractors are prioritising low-carbon materials, circular construction practices, and resource-efficient designs.

Environmental risks also extend beyond compliance. Climate-related factors such as weather volatility, water scarcity, and flooding are impacting site feasibility and construction schedules. As a result, insurance costs have risen, and project risk assessments increasingly include physical climate risk modelling. Companies with poor environmental strategies often face tighter margins, project delays, and limited investor interest.

In the current landscape, assessing environmental exposure has become a fundamental requirement for construction firms. Companies that can meet new standards while maintaining cost discipline are more likely to secure project opportunities and align with capital providers focused on sustainability.

Construction investment demands selectivity and foresight

Construction continues to support critical economic functions, from housing to infrastructure, but the sector no longer behaves predictably. Projects now face higher execution risks due to labour shortages, cost volatility, and tightening regulations. These disruptions are reshaping how the industry delivers and scales.

Investment outcomes increasingly depend on how well a company can plan, adapt, and deliver within these constraints. Firms that maintain delivery standards, control costs, and align with new environmental benchmarks tend to retain pricing power and access to capital. Overall, construction remains a viable sector for long-term capital, but broad exposure is no longer sufficient; being selective is essential.

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    After the chaos of Q2, the quarter ahead should get a bit more clarity on how Trump 2.0 is impacting...
  • Upending the global order at blinding speed

    Quarterly Outlook

    Upending the global order at blinding speed

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ...
  • Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Quarterly Outlook

    Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Quarterly Outlook

    China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

Content disclaimer

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15
2900 Hellerup
Denmark

Contact Saxo

Select region

International
International

All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.