manipulation1024x768 M

Investing beyond AI: Five future growth frontiers

Charu Chanana 400x400
Charu Chanana

Chief Investment Strategist

Key points:

  • The next wave of growth isn’t just AI: Five frontier themes are moving closer to commercial scale - robotaxis, drones/urban air mobility, space infrastructure, quantum technologies, and advanced nuclear. Each has potential to reshape industries and open new value chains.
  • Opportunities exist across the ecosystem: From platform operators and hardware suppliers to infrastructure enablers. Illustrative examples range from Waymo/Alphabet, Joby Aviation, Rocket Lab, and IonQ to Constellation Energy and Cameco.
  • Risks remain significant and uneven: Regulation, long timelines, capital intensity, and geopolitics mean investors should treat these as long-term, high-uncertainty exposures, best approached with selective sizing and diversification.


Investors are asking: what’s next after semiconductors and AI?

We see five frontiers that are moving from science fiction toward commercial scale. Each comes with opportunities along the value chain, but also with real risks that investors must weigh carefully.

1. Robotaxis and autonomous mobility

After years of skepticism, autonomous vehicle (AV) projects are now reaching commercial scale. Waymo is expanding its ride-hailing service in U.S. cities, while Cruise, Mobileye, and Aurora Innovation are advancing trials. Singapore and Dubai have also approved public pilot projects, signaling regulatory momentum.

Investor perspective:

  • Execution milestones: The commercial viability of robotaxis will depend on regulatory approvals, expansion into new cities, and integration with existing transport networks. Investors should monitor how many daily rides operators achieve and whether cost per mile falls toward profitable levels.
  • Trust and safety: Public perception and accident records will directly impact adoption. A few high-profile incidents could slow momentum or trigger new restrictions.
  • Economics: AV fleets require heavy upfront capex (vehicles, charging, maintenance depots). Unit economics will be more favorable in dense urban centers than in suburban or rural areas.
  • Competitive landscape: Established platforms (Uber, Lyft) may benefit from integrating third-party autonomy, while startups may struggle with funding needs. Chinese players like Pony.ai and WeRide face additional geopolitical and capital-intensity risks.

Where to look (illustrative examples):

  • Platform operators: Alphabet (GOOGL) via Waymo, Uber (UBER), Lyft (LYFT).
  • Technology enablers: Aurora Innovation (AUR), Innoviz (INVZ), Mobileye (MBLY).
  • Infrastructure providers: Blink Charging (BLNK).
  • Regional challengers: Pony.ai (PONY), WeRide (WRD).

Risks: Regulatory setbacks after accidents, unclear liability frameworks, consumer trust, and whether ride economics stack up outside dense urban centers. For Pony and WeRide specifically, risks include heavy capital intensity, ongoing losses, and geopolitical sensitivities given their China base.


2. Drones and urban air mobility

Commercial drones are moving into logistics, agriculture, and defense, while urban air mobility (UAM) companies are testing electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft as the next stage in transport innovation.

Investor perspective:

  • Certification hurdles: FAA type certification is crucial. Without it, commercial rollout won’t be possible.
  • Revenue visibility: Defense-linked drone makers like AeroVironment or Kratos may see steadier cash flow compared to eVTOL startups.
  • Urban adoption challenges: Battery range, noise, and airspace integration may slow real-world use.
  • Funding requirements: Pure-play eVTOL firms burn significant cash and may face dilution if timelines extend.

Where to look (illustrative examples):

  • Air taxi developers: Joby Aviation (JOBY), Archer Aviation (ACHR).
  • eVTOL entrants: Lilium (LILM) and EHang (EH) are both working on air taxis in Europe and China.
  • Defense & commercial drones: AeroVironment (AVAV), Kratos Defense (KTOS).
  • Connectivity providers: Ondas Holdings (ONDS).

Risks: Delays in certification, public resistance in cities, battery performance issues, high cash burn, and reliance on defense budgets for contracts.


3. Space infrastructure and services

The global space economy has already surpassed $600 billion and could triple by 2035. Cheaper launch services and miniaturized satellites are opening opportunities in Earth observation, broadband connectivity, and in-orbit servicing.

Investor perspective:

  • Capital intensity: Large upfront costs mean only well-capitalized players can scale.
  • Schedule risk: Launch and satellite timelines often slip, impacting revenues.
  • Government reliance: Contracts depend heavily on national space budgets and geopolitical priorities.
  • Emerging segments: Growth is strongest in data-driven services such as analytics and communications, not just rockets.

Where to look (illustrative examples):

  • Launch providers: Rocket Lab (RKLB).
  • Satellite analytics: Planet Labs (PL).
  • Broadband constellations: Telesat (TSAT).
  • Lunar services: Intuitive Machines (LUNR).
  • Prime contractors: Lockheed Martin (LMT).

Risks: Capital-intensive projects, frequent delays, reliance on government contracts, and orbital congestion (risk of collisions and tighter regulation).


4. Quantum technologies

Quantum is being positioned as the next computing leap. While practical quantum computing is years away, near-term opportunities lie in quantum sensing and post-quantum cybersecurity. Governments are committing tens of billions in funding, highlighting its strategic importance.

Investor perspective:

  • Timelines & uncertainty: Competing hardware approaches make it unclear which technology will win out.
  • Funding vs. revenues: Many firms are pre-revenue and dependent on external financing.
  • Ecosystem growth: Partnerships with corporates and governments may drive adoption before profitability.
  • Speculative nature: Potential rewards are huge, but exposure should be sized modestly given uncertainty.

Where to look (illustrative examples):

  • Computing pioneers: IonQ (IONQ), Rigetti Computing (RGTI).
  • Industrial joint ventures: Honeywell (HON) via Quantinuum.
  • Tech majors: Alphabet (GOOGL), IBM (IBM).

Risks: Long and uncertain commercialization timelines, heavy reliance on funding, volatile valuations tied to hype cycles, and execution challenges in scaling qubits.


5. Advanced nuclear & energy infrastructure

Electrification, data centers, and climate goals are pushing utilities into record spending on grid upgrades. At the same time, advanced nuclear and small modular reactors (SMRs) are gaining traction as policymakers search for reliable, carbon-free baseload power.

Investor perspective:

  • Grid demand: Utilities are increasing capex on transmission and reliability to meet surging demand.
  • Nuclear’s role: Advanced designs aim to overcome cost and time overruns that plagued traditional reactors.
  • Fuel bottlenecks: HALEU supply chains must scale before SMRs become viable.
  • Infrastructure angle: Engineering and construction firms benefit from long project pipelines, regardless of nuclear rollout speed.

Where to look (illustrative examples):

  • Utilities/operators: Constellation Energy (CEG), NextEra Energy (NEE), Duke Energy (DUK), Dominion Energy (D).
  • Fuel & components: Cameco (CCJ), BWX Technologies (BWXT). Kazatomprom (KAP.LN) is the world’s largest uranium producer, headquartered in Kazakhstan.
  • Engineering & infrastructure: Rolls-Royce (RR.LN) is developing small modular reactors; Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (7011 JP) has advanced nuclear expertise. Siemens Energy (ENR GY), ABB (ABBN SW) are the leaders in transmission and grid modernization.

Risks: Cost overruns, delays, public opposition, regulatory hurdles, and fuel supply constraints. Permitting challenges may also slow grid expansion.


Conclusion: Building portfolios around future frontiers

Investors looking beyond semis and AI should think in ecosystems, not just headline technologies. Each theme has a wide value chain, from hardware suppliers to infrastructure operators, that will see uneven winners and losers. Risks are significant, but so are the potential rewards for patient capital.


This material is marketing content and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results.
The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options..

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Q4 Outlook for Investors: Diversify like it’s 2025 – don’t fall for déjà vu

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q4 Outlook for Investors: Diversify like it’s 2025 – don’t fall for déjà vu

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Q4 Outlook for Traders: The Fed is back in easing mode. Is this time different?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q4 Outlook for Traders: The Fed is back in easing mode. Is this time different?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    The Fed launched a new easing cycle in late Q3. Will this cycle now play out like 2000 or 2007?
  • Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    After the chaos of Q2, the quarter ahead should get a bit more clarity on how Trump 2.0 is impacting...
  • Upending the global order at blinding speed

    Quarterly Outlook

    Upending the global order at blinding speed

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ...
  • Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Quarterly Outlook

    Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

Content disclaimer

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15
2900 Hellerup
Denmark

Contact Saxo

Select region

International
International

All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.