Quarterly Outlook
Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally
Jacob Falkencrone
Global Head of Investment Strategy
Global Head of Investment Strategy
Markets have survived wars and recessions, but can they handle Washington switching off the lights? Every few years, US politics serve up the same drama: lawmakers fail to agree on a budget, and parts of the federal government grind to a halt. Headlines scream, volatility ticks up, and investors brace for impact.
The reality? For financial markets, shutdowns have historically been more theatre than tragedy. They dent growth in the short term and stir nerves, but rarely leave lasting scars on portfolios. Still, with debt climbing and politics more polarised than ever, investors, both in America and abroad, are right to ask whether this time could be different.
Here are ten key questions, answered.
A shutdown happens when Congress fails to pass the spending bills or a stopgap “continuing resolution” needed to fund government operations. Without legal authority to spend, many agencies must partially close.
Essential services like the military, law enforcement and Social Security continue, but so-called “non-essential” services from passport processing to national parks pause. Around 800,000 federal workers are typically furloughed or work without pay until a deal is struck.
“Think of it as the government putting itself into flight mode. Some systems keep running, but others freeze until someone hits the reset button.”
Shutdowns and debt ceilings often get conflated, but they are not the same. A shutdown is a lapse in authority to spend on new programmes, the government keeps paying existing bills, including interest on its debt. A debt-ceiling crisis, by contrast, is about whether the US can borrow to meet obligations already incurred. That raises the spectre of default, far more serious for markets.
“Shutdowns are political noise. Debt-ceiling standoffs are potential systemic shocks. Markets know the difference, and so should investors.”
Since 1976 there have been 20 funding gaps, with 10 leading to visible shutdowns. Most were over quickly, lasting just a few days. The longest, in 2018–19, dragged on for 35 days and shaved about USD 3 billion off GDP permanently, still a blip in a USD 20 trillion economy.
The historical record suggests shutdowns are frustrating political battles, but rarely market-shaping events in their own right.
When a shutdown hits, the disruption is uneven. National parks, museums and many federal offices close their doors. Passport and visa processing grinds to a halt. Regulatory approvals and environmental permits pile up, while government contractors face stop-work orders and delayed payments.
Yet the essentials keep running. Social Security cheques still go out, Medicare continues, and debt servicing is unaffected. TSA officers, soldiers and air traffic controllers usually keep working, though often unpaid until the impasse ends.
For markets, the biggest headache is the data blackout: no jobs report, no CPI, no GDP figures until funding resumes. That leaves investors and the Federal Reserve flying blind.
Source: Saxo Bank analysis, Bloomberg
The record shows markets typically shrug. The S&P 500’s median return during shutdowns is around zero, and in several cases stocks even rose as investors looked beyond the drama. In 2013, for instance, the index gained more than 3% during a 16-day closure.
The longer-term picture is even clearer: on average, the S&P 500 has risen about 12% in the 12 months following shutdowns. Treasuries often rally on safe-haven demand, gold tends to edge higher, and the dollar wobbles but rarely moves decisively.
“Shutdowns have been more of a speed bump than a crash barrier for markets. Investors tend to regret panicking, not waiting.”
The real danger is not markets tumbling but the data blackout. When agencies like the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of Economic Analysis shut, the Fed loses the inflation and jobs data it relies on to guide interest rates. That uncertainty can unsettle markets and force the central bank into guesswork. In today’s data-dependent policy environment, this is a sharper risk than in past cycles.
The pain is felt unevenly. Defence and aerospace contractors, heavily reliant on government contracts, are usually the first to wobble as payments stall. Healthcare and pharmaceutical companies can face delays in FDA approvals. Tourism and airlines feel the impact when national parks close and airport security strains under unpaid staff. Banks and mortgage lenders are hit when the IRS pauses income verifications.
By contrast, defensive sectors tend to hold their ground. Utilities and consumer staples remain steady as people keep the lights on and buy groceries. Gold often rises as investors seek safety. And large-cap tech, with little direct reliance on government budgets, often shrugs off the drama.
Yes, but not too much.
Because US equities make up around 70 percent of global market cap, any wobble on Wall Street often ripples through Europe and Asia. But the bigger channel for European investors is currencies. If the dollar weakens, US holdings lose value once converted back into euros. If the dollar strengthens, the opposite happens.
“For Europeans, a shutdown is less about S&P 500 headlines and more about what it does to the dollar in your portfolio.”
Possibly.
The US fiscal backdrop is weaker than in many past episodes: deficits near USD 2 trillion a year, debt above 100 percent of GDP, and polarised politics that make compromise harder. A short shutdown would likely follow the historical script. But if it drags on, especially alongside other stresses such as weak growth or a credit rating warning, it could raise deeper concerns about US fiscal credibility.
Shutdowns may stir headlines, but they rarely rewrite investment stories. For most investors, the playbook is relatively simple:
“Most shutdowns end up as political theatre with financial side effects, not the start of a market crisis. The patient investor usually wins.”
Shutdowns are unsettling but rarely decisive. They are usually short-term noise rather than lasting signal, and markets tend to recover quickly once funding resumes. The bigger risk lies in the temporary blackout of economic data, which can leave the Federal Reserve and investors navigating without a compass. Defensive sectors such as utilities, staples and gold often prove more resilient than contractors or tourism, while for non-US investors the main impact is felt through the dollar and global sentiment.
Shutdowns may dominate headlines, but for markets they have been more like bad weather: inconvenient and quickly forgotten. The lesson from history is clear. The sky does not fall, and patience is usually rewarded.