image with in asset-copy _ Inside article 1140x160 Steen image with in asset-copy _ Inside article 1140x160 Steen image with in asset-copy _ Inside article 1140x160 Steen

Inflation will not moderate, it is a runaway train

Strats-Steen-88x88
Steen Jakobsen

Chief Investment Officer

Summary:  There is a great need in the human psyche for normalcy and predictability. This is what investors and policymakers have been hoping for since the chaos unleashed by the pandemic, followed by the war in Ukraine.


There is a great need in the human psyche for normalcy and predictability. This is what investors and policymakers have been hoping for since the chaos unleashed by the pandemic, followed by the war in Ukraine. But the current brutal pace of change and volatility is here to stay for now. Don’t expect any return to moderation or calm over the rest of 2022, or for some time thereafter for that matter. 

This outlook addresses how the economy and markets react when undergoing a paradigm shift from high economic visibility and low inflation to one of high volatility and high inflation. And we are talking about a real paradigm shift, really the first of its magnitude in modern history since President Carter and Fed Chair Volcker did in the late 1970s what President Biden and Fed Chair Powell are trying to do today—kill inflation. Back then, the task was somewhat easier, given a young population and low leverage in both the public and private sectors of the economy. Now we have an older, asset-rich private sector and a massively indebted public sector. Spoiler alert: it won’t be easy. 

The last two decades of endless policy support have served investors well, as the main macro policy has been one of infinite monetary easing at every stumble and plenty of countercyclical fiscal stimulus. The buy-the-dip mentality prevailed and was rewarded at every turn, as policymakers continued to increase the ‘speed of the train’—the quantity of money feeding into the economy—with no or negligible impact on goods inflation due to the labour and cheap energy arbitrage of globalisation. This, even as asset inflation raged due to the rising leverage driven by ever lower policy rates. 

‘The great moderation’ was the narrative of the time, and former Fed Chair Bernanke went out of his way to boast that the standard deviation of quarterly GDP had halved and inflation had declined by two-thirds during this period. In other words, the economy was supposedly becoming ever more predictable and less volatile, not recognising that it was a one-off process allowed by ever easier policy rates, hidden leverage and globalisation. The seemingly endless cycle of being able to simply ease at every speed bump in the economy or markets even allowed us to indulge in the fantasies of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), which claimed there is no real hindrance to simply printing money for fiscal stimulus. 

But the final phases of the rinse-and-repeat of policy stimulus aggravated growing imbalances, as policy rates began falling below realised inflation. This resulted in deepening negative real yields, which became necessary to continue to fuel the rise of asset prices but which also brought weak capital returns, as negative real rates drove increasingly unproductive investment.  

Over the last two decades, we have created an economy and society where the financial part of the economy kept growing at the expense of the ‘real economy’ of physical goods and activity. Simply put: the real economy became too small in relative terms, something that was made suddenly and painfully clear in the wake of the pandemic outbreak, when the enormous push generated from the financial economy to sustain demand fed straight into inflation. That’s because the physical economy, the supply side, could not come close to meeting a stepwise shift higher in demand. That was in part due to the shutdowns limiting production, but also as the long-term underinvestment in energy infrastructure and the dream of shifting to far more expensive alternative energy meant that the physical world simply couldn’t keep up. 

At its recent extreme low during the pandemic outbreak phase, the energy component of the S&P 500 fell below 3 percent of the index’s market cap. This at a time when the five most valuable companies, all from the digital financial world, were worth more than 25 percent of the index. Meanwhile, pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, asset managers and even governments (Sweden and Finland) banned investment into fossil energy due to environmental, social and governance (ESG) mandates, despite this energy driving the bulk of the economic activity upon which our daily life is based. And then the Russian invasion of Ukraine added fuel to the flames.   

This brings us to today and our core outlook for the second half of 2022. Central bankers continue to peddle the idea that ‘normalisation’ to around 2 percent inflation target is possible within an 18-month horizon. But why should we listen when these same people never conceived that inflation could reach above 8 percent in both Europe and the US? The risk is that inflation expectations are rising fast and driving second-round inflationary effects that will require central banks to tighten even more than they or the market currently conceives until the runaway train is controlled, likely sending us into a deep recession.  

This creates the next macro policy change and response we will need to look for in Q3 2022. Given a policy choice of either higher inflation or a deep recession, the political answer will likely be to instruct central banks directly or indirectly to move the inflation target up from 2 percent. The optics of this would hopefully mean requiring a bit less tightening, but also that negative real rates, or financial repression, are a real embedded policy objective now. It’s also a risky bet that there is some Goldilocks-level of demand destruction from a higher policy rate that will start to force inflation lower, all while demand is subsidised for the most vulnerable with support schemes for power, heating, petrol and food. The holes in this policy argument are that none of this addresses the imbalances in the economy. Whether the Fed has a 2 or 3 percent inflation target does not create more cheap energy. What is clear is that the political system will favor the ‘soft option’ for inflation in which the chief imperative is financial repression to keep the sovereign funded and a reduction of the real value of public debt via inflation. This is exactly why inflation will continue to rise structurally. Q3 and beyond will make it clearer that political dominance pulls far more rank in the new cycle than monetary tightening, which will forever chase from behind. The great moderation is dead—long live the great reset. 

Explore products at Saxo

Disclaimer

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)
Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/legal/saxoselect-disclaimer/disclaimer)

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15
2900
Hellerup
Denmark

Contact Saxo

Select region

International
International

Trade responsibly
All trading carries risk. Read more. To help you understand the risks involved we have put together a series of Key Information Documents (KIDs) highlighting the risks and rewards related to each product. Read more

This website can be accessed worldwide however the information on the website is related to Saxo Bank A/S and is not specific to any entity of Saxo Bank Group. All clients will directly engage with Saxo Bank A/S and all client agreements will be entered into with Saxo Bank A/S and thus governed by Danish Law.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc, registered in the US and other countries and regions. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.