oil opec russia venezuela

Crude oil: Short-term surplus meets long-term supply risk

Picture of Ole Hansen
Ole Hansen

Head of Commodity Strategy

Key takeaways

  • Brent and WTI continue to hold above USD 60 and USD 55, two key levels, though the underlying tone has weakened as ample near-term supply weighs on sentiment.
  • Oil held on tankers—a proxy for logistical strain and unsold barrels—has surged to a pandemic-era high, yet futures spreads remain too shallow to revive the carry trade.
  • Beneath the short-term surplus lies a structural imbalance: prices are now too low to incentivize future supply growth as producers hesitate to invest.
  • With chronic underinvestment, U.S. shale breakevens above spot levels, and OPEC+ nearing capacity, crude could re-emerge as a compelling contrarian play in 2026

Brent crude continues to hold above the key USD 60 level, and WTI above USD 55, but the tone beneath the surface has turned increasingly heavy. The prompt futures discount to the six-month contract (see chart below) has widened to its deepest level since December 2023, a clear sign that near-term supply is ample, but not yet to the extent it will rekindle the so-called carry trade where crude is bought and stored on tankers to be sold at higher price in the future. The softening structure, coupled with weakness in physical markets from Europe to West Africa, points to a market drifting into a short-term surplus phase.

At the same time, tanker tracking data show the number of barrels held at sea climbing to record levels, as buyers grow more selective and sellers struggle to clear cargoes. The result is a classic picture of oversupply—contango on the futures curve, discounts in the physical market, and speculators increasingly willing to bet on further price weakness.

Yet despite widespread talk of a glut, Brent and WTI have so far managed to hold above their USD 60 and USD 55 handles (see charts below). Part of that resilience owes to improved risk sentiment across broader financial markets, amid renewed optimism that trade tensions may ease. Another part may reflect a deeper hesitation: traders know that while the market looks comfortable in the near term, the seeds of future tightness are already being sown.

A growing surplus, but no collapse

The latest shifts in the futures curve underscore how sentiment has changed. The prompt Brent discount to the six-month contract has widened sharply, reflecting a growing belief that OPEC+ output increases and rising non-OPEC supply will keep the market well stocked through the winter. Oil held on tankers—a rough proxy for logistical strain and unsold cargoes—has surged to a pandemic-era record. That volume acts as a buffer, ensuring short-term availability but also amplifying the sense that physical barrels are abundant.

Even so, the forward curve remains far from the extreme levels that would normally encourage large-scale storage trades. The current contango is modest compared to those seen during genuine oversupply phases, such as in 2020. This suggests that while the market acknowledges the surplus, it has yet to fully price in a protracted glut. There is still some faith that demand, or self-correcting supply dynamics, will eventually absorb the excess.

Speculators lean short but remain cautious

With Brent stuck below USD 65, speculative sentiment remains fragile. Managed money accounts have been reducing long exposure in recent weeks while adding to gross shorts, betting on further downside as inventories build and the curve softens. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s data blackout has limited visibility into exact positioning, but Brent crude data from the ICE Europe Exchange show a drop in the net long to a five-month low, and a jump in the gross short to a 13-month high. 

The investment problem

Beyond the immediate supply cushion lies a more structural issue: price levels that are too low to sustain future output. The U.S. shale patch, which has been the swing supplier of the past decade, is already showing signs of fatigue. The Permian Basin—America’s most prolific source of incremental supply—now requires roughly USD 61 per barrel to break even, well above the current WTI price of around USD 57.

At these levels, producers are reluctant to commit fresh capital. Drilling activity has slowed, and decline rates from existing wells are accelerating. If prices remain depressed, the risk is that production capacity erodes faster than expected. That would leave the market vulnerable to tightness later in the decade, especially if global demand continues to rise as projected.

This underinvestment trend is hardly new but increasingly acute. Investor pressure for capital discipline, tighter environmental regulation, and volatile pricing have kept upstream spending well below pre-pandemic norms. According to the IEA, global oil and gas investment remains about 25% below the 2015–2019 average. In a market still heavily dependent on aging fields that decline 4–6% annually, that gap quickly translates into lost barrels. The IEA estimates that more than 45 million barrels per day in new conventional supply must be developed by 2050 simply to replace declining production and maintain current output levels.

China quietly stockpiles

Adding a layer of complexity, China appears to be taking advantage of lower prices to top up its reserves. Recent satellite and customs data suggest steady inflows into both commercial and strategic storage facilities. With at least 11 new reserve sites planned through 2026, China’s capacity to absorb dips has increased materially.

This strategic buying—mirroring the steady gold accumulation by central banks since 2022—is often opaque in real time, yet it quietly underpins the market by offering a soft floor on price. It also illustrates how weakness can paradoxically tighten the future balance: cheap oil invites stocking up today, reducing the available cushion for tomorrow.

Market reluctant to fully price the glut

The apparent contradiction—ample barrels now but no aggressive contango—tells an important story. Traders see the surplus, but they also see limits to how long it can last. With U.S. shale discipline firm, OPEC+ output near capacity, and investment slow elsewhere, the market may be reluctant to push prices too far below marginal cost.

It’s also worth noting that even modest demand growth can quickly erase perceived oversupply. The IEA’s latest outlook sees global demand continuing to rise into 2026, driven by petrochemicals and emerging markets. Against that backdrop, today’s bearish sentiment starts to look cyclical rather than structural.

Near-term caution, long-term respect

For now, the path of least resistance remains lower. The market is grappling with seasonal demand softness, swelling storage, and negative sentiment. As long as Brent remains below USD 65, rallies will likely be sold into, and calendar spreads will reflect the ongoing length in prompt supply.

But it would be a mistake to treat the current weakness as the new normal. The energy system still depends on continual reinvestment to offset decline. Without prices high enough to incentivize that, production—especially from high-cost basins—will fade. The same low prices that comfort consumers today can set the stage for price spikes tomorrow.

In that sense, the oil market again reveals its cyclical rhythm: abundance fuels complacency, which inevitably breeds shortage. As the industry edges toward the trough of its investment cycle, crude could well re-emerge as one of the more compelling contrarian opportunities heading into 2026. 

21olh_oil3
The six-month WTI and Brent spreads moving towards contango, but yet to levels that support a return of the 2020 carry trade
21olh_oil2
WTI crude oil, first month cont. - Source: Saxo
21olh_oil1
Brent Crude Oil, first month cont. - Source: Saxo
20olh_cot1
Managed money long, short and net positions in Brent crude oil
Related articles/content             
20 Oct 2025: Commodities: Flying blind as US shutdown halts COT reporting
20 Oct 2025: Precious metals pause after record highs
10 Oct 2025: Commodities weekly Debasement fears the latest focus fuelling demand
8 Oct 2025: Gold powers through USD 4000 as investors question the old order
3 Oct 2025: Commodities Weekly Shutdown risks boost demand for hard assets
1 Oct 2025: Grain markets pressured by harvest and rising stocks
30 Sept 2025: Month-end and Chinas Golden Week cool golds record run
29 Sept 2025: COT on FX and Commodities - Week to 23 September 2025
26 Sept 2025: Commodities weekly Riding a wave of broad-based strength
25 Sept 2025: Copper Grasberg disruption adds fuel to robust demand outlook
24 Sept 2025: Precious metals surge to fresh highs as Fed cuts add fuel
22 Sept 2025: COT on Forex and Commodities - Week to 16 September 2025
17 Sept 2025: In demand gold and silver brace for Fed decision
15 Sept 2025: COT on Forex and Commodities - Week to 9 September 2025
11 Sept 2025: High tech needs low tech AIs power appetite and coppers constraint
8 Sept 2025: COT on Forex and Commodities - Week to 2 September 2025
5 Sept 2025: Commodities weekly Metals lead crude heavy ags under pressure
4 Sept 2025: OPEC supply expansion and Russias export woes keep crude rangebound
3 Sept 2025: Gold breaks to fresh record as investors seek alternatives in a fractured world
1 Sept 2025: Silver powers past USD 40 to 14-year highs
1 Sept 2025: COT on Forex and Commodities - Week to 26 August 2025
28 Aug 2025: Steepening US yield curve and what it means for gold
27 Aug 2025: US lumber futures erase tariff gains hint at housing slowdown
26 Aug 2025: Trouble at the Fed supports gold and silver
25 Aug 2025: COT on Forex and Commodities - Week to 19 August 2025
22 Aug 2025: Commodities weekly ags and energy steady the ship metals lag as Powell looms
21 Aug 2025: Crude oil supported by US inventory decline robust demand and weak positioning
19 Aug 2025: Gold and silver still boxed in waiting for the next catalyst
18 Aug 2025: COT on Forex and Commodities - Week to 12 August
15 Aug 2025: Commodities weekly metals and softs rise in August as energy and grains slide
14 Aug 2025: Weekly gains across soft commodities on weather and policy-induced risks
13 Aug 2025: WASDE projects record corn crop tighter soybeans wheat under pressure
11 Aug 2025: COT on Forex and Commodities - 11 Aug 2025
8 Aug 2025: Tariff shock sends gold futures soaring yet spot market holds the real signal
6 Aug 2025: Crude oil caught between supply surge and geopolitical tensions
5 Aug 2025: Trump tariffs copper chaos and the metals that still matter
4 Aug 2025: COT Report: Speculators cut metals and grain exposure ahead of copper rout
9 July 2025: NY copper surges on 50 Trump tariff threat
8 July 2025: Gold silver platinum take a timeout after strong first half
7 July 2025: Crude prices steady as OPEC fast-tracks output hike
3 July 2025: Commodities Foundations set for the next bull run


Educational resources:
The basics of trading wheat online
A short guide to trading copper
Gold, silver, and platinum: Are precious metals a safe haven investment?

Daily podcasts hosted by John J Hardy can be found here


More from the author             
This content is marketing material and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results.
The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options..

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Q4 Outlook for Investors: Diversify like it’s 2025 – don’t fall for déjà vu

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q4 Outlook for Investors: Diversify like it’s 2025 – don’t fall for déjà vu

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Q4 Outlook for Traders: The Fed is back in easing mode. Is this time different?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q4 Outlook for Traders: The Fed is back in easing mode. Is this time different?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    The Fed launched a new easing cycle in late Q3. Will this cycle now play out like 2000 or 2007?
  • Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    After the chaos of Q2, the quarter ahead should get a bit more clarity on how Trump 2.0 is impacting...
  • Upending the global order at blinding speed

    Quarterly Outlook

    Upending the global order at blinding speed

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ...
  • Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Quarterly Outlook

    Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

Content disclaimer

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15
2900 Hellerup
Denmark

Contact Saxo

Select region

International
International

All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.