WCU broad selection

Commodities Weekly: Weather, war and debt broaden the commodity rally

Commodities 5 minutes to read

Key Points:

  • The rally continues to broaden: The Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index (BCOMTR) gained around 3% this week, lifting its year-to-date return to 30%, with all major sectors except industrial metals contributing. 
  • Scarcity is taking multiple forms: Geopolitical disruption, constrained energy flows, tightening agricultural supply and increasingly volatile weather are combining with concerns about fiscal sustainability and currency debasement. 
  • Agriculture joins the advance: Soft commodities led this week's gains as El Niño risks intensified, while grains were supported by Black Sea export disruptions, weather concerns and rising input costs. 
  • Fiscal concerns strengthen the hard-asset case, but risks remain: The fleeting response to expanded US Treasury bond buybacks highlights investor unease about debt and inflation, although higher real yields, dollar strength, demand destruction and an easing of supply constraints could still challenge the rally.

Commodities rally as scarcity takes multiple forms

Weather, war, fiscal debt concerns and a softer dollar have combined to support another week of broad-based commodity gains, strengthening the impression that the rally is no longer being driven by a handful of isolated supply stories. The Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index rose around 3.3% this week, lifting its year-to-date return above 30%, while the 12-month gain has reached around 44%. All major sectors except industrial metals traded higher, while at the individual commodity level, platinum, silver, crude oil, diesel and EU gas led the gains.

Earlier commodity rallies were often dominated by one sector, most recently precious metals followed by energy, but the current advance increasingly reflects several independent drivers occurring at the same time. Physical supply constraints, geopolitical fragmentation, weather volatility and concerns about fiscal sustainability are supporting different parts of the commodity complex for different reasons.

Another notable feature is the performance gap between commodity spot prices and total returns. The BCOM Spot Index reflects movements in underlying commodity prices trades up 23% year-to-date, while the BCOMTR also incorporates futures roll returns and the return earned on collateral has gained the mentioned 30.5%. In markets characterised by backwardation, where nearby futures trade above deferred contracts, investors can benefit from positive roll yield as positions are rolled forward.

This helps explain why total commodity returns have been particularly strong. It also underlines an important characteristic of the current environment: tight physical conditions are not only lifting prices but, in several markets, creating curve structures that can enhance returns for futures-based investors or ETFs that track the performance of these futures.

21olh_wcu1
Broad gains seen across most major commodities this past week - Source: Bloomberg & Saxo

Agriculture joins the scarcity trade

Agriculture has become an increasingly important part of the rally, with soft commodities leading this week's gains while grains have also strengthened. Here, the combination of weather and war is beginning to challenge what had previously been a relatively comfortable global supply outlook.

The weather story centres increasingly on El Niño. The developing event is expected to be unusually strong, raising the risk of disruptive weather patterns across several major agricultural producing regions. Tropical crops are particularly exposed, with coffee production in Southeast Asia, cocoa in West Africa and sugar production across parts of Asia and Brazil all vulnerable to shifts in rainfall and temperature.

The impact is already visible in prices. Sugar has extended a powerful rebound amid concerns about production prospects in India and Thailand, while cocoa and coffee have also strengthened as traders reassess supply risks. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization's Food Price Index rose in July to its highest level since January 2023, with cereal prices up 3.4% during the month and sugar rising 5.6%.

The concern extends beyond crop yields. Agriculture is highly energy intensive, and the Middle East conflict has raised costs for diesel, fertiliser, transportation and irrigation. The FAO has warned that the combination of war, expensive agricultural inputs and El Niño could produce another bout of global food inflation later this year.

21olh_wcu2
Sugar and Corn - Source: Saxo

Grains face a different but equally important source of uncertainty. Escalating attacks around the Black Sea are disrupting one of the world's most important agricultural export corridors for wheat and sunflower oil. Ukraine recently cut its 2026/27 grain export forecast by as much as 12% following Russian attacks on its seaports, while disruption has also affected Russian export infrastructure.

In addition, Chicago corn futures have risen to an 18-month high after an industry field tour across the US Midwest suggested the corn crop is smaller than previously expected, raising concerns that yield potential may be more limited than forecast. At the same time, the tit-for-tat attacks by Russia and Ukraine on ports and vessels may ultimately force major buyers to seek alternative suppliers, potentially boosting demand and prices in other exporting regions.

The risk is therefore increasingly two-sided: weather threatens production while geopolitical disruption threatens the ability to move available crops to consumers. With energy and fertiliser costs already elevated, the margin for absorbing additional supply shocks is becoming smaller.

Bond market unease adds another dimension

The week's other major development came outside the commodity markets but may ultimately prove equally important for the hard-asset story. The US Treasury surprised markets by announcing that it would at least double the size of liquidity-support buybacks for longer-dated government bonds, increasing purchases of 10- to 30-year securities to at least USD 4 billion per operation. The announcement came after 30-year Treasury yields had climbed to 5.34%, their highest level since 2007.

Initially, the intervention worked. Long-dated bonds rallied sharply and the yield curve bull-flattened as 30-year yields fell. The dollar weakened and hard assets received another boost.

More interesting, however, was what happened next. The rally quickly faded, with 30-year yields returning towards 5.25% despite Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent subsequently stressing that the administration has a "big toolkit" available to address borrowing costs. The expanded purchases remain modest relative to a Treasury market of more than USD 32 trillion, while total US government debt has now crossed USD 40 trillion.

The Financial Times captured the sceptical market response with one investor describing the initiative as a "band-aid on a bullet hole". The underlying concern is that liquidity operations can address market functioning but do little by themselves to resolve persistent fiscal deficits, rising interest expenditure and the growing supply of government debt.

For commodities, this debate matters because it challenges one of the traditional mechanisms through which commodity rallies eventually extinguish themselves. Normally, higher commodity prices lift inflation, pushing interest rates and real yields higher, strengthening the currency and eventually slowing demand.

21olh_wcu4
Gold has been supported by a weaker dollar but with limited help from elevated real yields - Source: Bloomberg & Saxo

The question is whether large government debt burdens make that adjustment increasingly uncomfortable. If policymakers attempt to contain long-term borrowing costs while inflation remains elevated, investors may increasingly seek protection in assets whose supply cannot easily be expanded.

This does not mean monetary or fiscal policy has entered a new regime, but the market reaction this week, especially the strong rally seen across the investment metals and cryptos, suggests investors are at least asking the question. The renewed weakness in the dollar, down 1% on the week but still within the range seen during the past year, has added another tailwind, given that most internationally traded commodities are priced in US dollars.

Different commodities, common denominator

Energy remains an obvious source of physical stress as the conflict with Iran continues to disrupt Middle Eastern flows and keep refined-product markets exceptionally tight. Precious metals, meanwhile, continue to attract demand amid fiscal concerns and dollar weakness. Both themes have been covered extensively in our recent updates: When bond markets need support, hard assets start to look harder, Calm crude, tightening diesel: the real oil market stress is downstream, Copper versus gold: what an old macro signal is telling us now, and Gold holds firm as rate hike risks fade despite elevated bond yields.

What is more notable this week is how those forces are spreading across the broader commodity complex. Agriculture is responding to weather, war and higher input costs. Precious metals are responding increasingly to fiscal and currency concerns. Energy remains supported by geopolitical disruption and constrained product availability, while industrial metals continue to face longer-term supply challenges despite some near-term relief.

21olh_wcu3
Gold has broken key technical resistance levels - Source: Saxo

Copper provides a useful reminder that the story is not universally bullish. London Metal Exchange inventories are heading for their largest weekly increase since 2020 as traders deliver metal against elevated prices following months of tightness. The response demonstrates how higher prices can attract supply and eventually ease scarcity. Prices nevertheless rallied once again ahead of the weekend after China, the world's top consumer of the metal, introduced a new dose of fiscal support for the economy during one of its weakest periods in years driven by sluggish domestic demand and private spending. Measures that may support demand for commodities, including copper.

Higher prices can destroy demand, encourage substitution and accelerate new supply. A meaningful de-escalation in the Middle East or Black Sea could remove geopolitical risk premiums from energy and grains. El Niño-related concerns may ultimately prove less damaging than currently feared, while a credible US fiscal consolidation programme could reduce long-term yields, stabilise the dollar and weaken demand for hard assets.

Equally, a sharp global economic slowdown would challenge industrial commodities and energy, while persistent inflation could force central banks to maintain restrictive monetary policy for longer. Higher real yields and renewed dollar strength would be particularly important headwinds for precious metals and potentially the wider commodity complex.

For now, however, the defining feature remains breadth. The commodity rally is increasingly being supported by several independent forms of scarcity occurring simultaneously: constrained physical supply, geopolitical disruption, weather uncertainty and growing concern about the purchasing power of financial assets.

That does not guarantee prices will continue higher at the recent pace, and after a 30% year-to-date total return, the risk of corrections and profit-taking has clearly increased. But compared with earlier in the year, when performance depended heavily on a few individual markets, the current rally has developed a much broader foundation.

In a world where weather, war and debt are increasingly challenging assumptions about abundant supply and stable purchasing power, commodities are once again demonstrating their distinct role within diversified portfolios, and we maintain our long-held bullish view on the sector.

This content is marketing material. 

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice or a recommendation.

Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Saxo partners with companies that provide compensation for promotional activities conducted on its platform. Some partners also pay retrocessions contingent on clients investing in products from those partners.

While Saxo receives compensation from these partnerships, all educational and research content remains focused on providing information to clients.

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15
2900 Hellerup
Denmark

Contact Saxo

International
International

All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.