Outrageous Predictions
Carry trade unwind brings USD/JPY to 100 and Japan’s next asset bubble
Charu Chanana
Chief Investment Strategist
Investment Strategist
UniCredit’s Commerzbank move shows scale is back on Europe’s banking agenda.
BNP Paribas is betting that owning more of the savings chain brings steadier growth.
Stress in private credit and fintech’s banking shift make incumbents look sturdier again.
For years, European banks looked like the market’s least glamorous dinner guests. Too regulated, too fragmented, too slow. Useful, perhaps, but rarely exciting. Yet the last five years tell a more flattering story. Europe’s supposedly dull banks have quietly been one of the stronger corners of the market. That outperformance reflects a rediscovery of their core strengths: sticky deposits, wide distribution, improving capital returns and business models that look more resilient when money is no longer free.
This week’s headlines push that story further. UniCredit is pressing harder on Commerzbank, while BNP Paribas is pushing deeper into asset management after buying AXA Investment Managers. Different deals, same message: Europe’s big banks want more scale, more distribution and more control over the full customer relationship.
The UniCredit-Commerzbank story is the blunt version of the theme. UniCredit now owns 26% of Commerzbank and has another 4% through swaps, which are derivative contracts that can later turn into shares. Its latest exchange offer implies a value of 30.8 EUR per Commerzbank share, only about 4% above Commerzbank’s 13 March 2026 close. Reuters reported that UniCredit does not expect much take-up and sees the bid partly as a way to force talks and gain flexibility. That is what makes the move so interesting. This is not romance. It is leverage.
The resistance matters just as much. Germany’s government still owns 12.7% of Commerzbank and said on 16 March 2026 that a hostile takeover would be unacceptable. Commerzbank continues to back its standalone strategy. So Europe is left with a familiar contradiction. Policymakers often say they want stronger continental banks, and the European Central Bank has pushed for more cross-border consolidation, but national politics still tends to slam on the brakes when a real deal appears. Europe likes integration in theory. In practice, it often prefers a sturdy border and a press statement.
For long-term investors, that matters because scale in banking is not only about bigger balance sheets. It is about technology spending, compliance costs, product breadth and the ability to serve clients across lending, payments, trade finance and wealth. In a market where regulation is heavy and growth is modest, scale can be a margin tool as much as a growth tool.
BNP Paribas tells the same story with better tailoring. Its acquisition of AXA Investment Managers closed on 1 July 2025, and the bank now says its asset-management arm aims to nearly double pre-tax income by 2030. The division manages more than 1.6 trillion EUR of assets under management and targets around 350 billion EUR of cumulative net inflows by 2030.
That matters because the modern universal bank is no longer just a lender waiting for interest income. It wants deposits, yes, but it also wants the savings account, the pension mandate, the insurer relationship, the exchange-traded fund shelf, the private-market product and the advisory fee. In plain English, banks are trying to earn money from more parts of the customer wallet and not lean so heavily on where rates happen to be this year. That tends to make earnings steadier and the business model more useful in choppier markets.
This is also why the old split between banks and asset managers is starting to look less clean. BNP is not buying nostalgia. It is buying distribution, sticky client assets and a stronger position in long-term savings. That is a more modern kind of bank expansion than simply adding branches in the next postcode.
The backdrop helps. Strains in private credit are rippling into Wall Street, with tighter lending, withdrawal limits at some funds and rising concern around valuations, transparency and weaker borrowers. Moody’s data cited by Reuters showed banks had more than 925 billion USD of direct and committed exposure to private-credit and private-equity borrowers by mid-2025. At the same time, Reuters Breakingviews has argued that artificial intelligence is complicating exits for private-equity-backed software companies by hitting valuations and making business models harder to judge.
Fintech adds an ironic twist. This is not a story about fintech disappearing. Quite the opposite. According to Global Banking & Finance Review, London overtook San Francisco and New York as the world’s largest fintech hub, while European fintech funding reached parity with the United States over 2022 to 2025. But just days earlier, Reuters also reported that Revolut had secured a full United Kingdom banking licence, letting it offer protected deposits and expand lending. That is the point. Many ambitious fintechs are not trying to avoid being banks anymore. They are trying to become better ones.
Put those threads together and the appeal of the universal bank becomes easier to see. Deposits matter. Regulation matters. Distribution matters. Trust matters. None of that is fashionable language. It is just hard to replace when markets get messy.
This story is not a clean victory parade. Politics can still block the biggest cross-border mergers, as Commerzbank shows. Credit costs can still rise if Europe’s economy slows. And fee businesses are steadier than trading desks, but they are not immune to market swings or weaker client activity. There is also a more subtle risk: banks may try to become everything at once and end up with complexity rather than focus. The early warning signs are fairly visible. Watch for louder political resistance, rising loan-loss provisions, weaker net inflows in savings businesses and any evidence that integration synergies remain stuck in PowerPoint.
Watch which banks diversify earnings beyond plain lending and explain that mix clearly.
Treat deposit strength and distribution reach as competitive assets, not boring background details.
Separate political ambition from deal reality in cross-border banking mergers.
Follow where fintech models are converging with banking, not merely competing with it.
European banking is not returning to the past. It is reclaiming parts of finance that once looked destined to drift elsewhere. UniCredit is using a blunt instrument to argue that scale still matters. BNP Paribas is making the quieter case that controlling savings, advice and distribution may matter even more.
Around them, private credit looks less effortless and fintech looks more bank-like. That does not make every incumbent a winner. It does suggest the old universal-bank model is adapting rather than fading. For an industry that spent years being called boring, that may be the sharpest twist of all: the safest-looking buildings on the street are suddenly where some of the boldest strategic moves are happening.