Outrageous Predictions
Executive Summary: Outrageous Predictions 2026
Saxo Group
Summary: How Danish investors view markets, diversification, and key macro themes for the coming half-year
Danish investors enter the next six months with confidence—especially toward Europe and Japan—while taking a more measured view of the US. Diversification plans broadly favour staying the course, with a slightly higher than global openness to adding new areas. On macro themes, growth optimism stands out for Denmark, whereas overvaluation and AI-related concerns matter less than globally.
In the first line of questions, we asked our clients whether they believe that the five equity markets—the C25, the US market, the European market, the Japanese market, and the global market—would 1) increase, 2) decrease, or show 3) no movement in value over the next half-year.
Danish optimism is most pronounced for Europe and Japan. For Europe, 74% expect the market to rise versus 51% globally; for Japan, the share is 71% versus 63% globally. Views on the global equity market are closely aligned (56% Denmark vs 57% global). By contrast, the US is the relative soft spot (35% Denmark vs 40% global). The Danish (C25) market also sits near the global baseline for “local markets” (45% Denmark vs 48% global).
Taken together, Denmark broadly mirrors global sentiment but is clearly more upbeat on Europe and Japan, with a comparatively cautious stance on the US.
The same pattern holds across demographics. For Europe, Danish women and men are both well above their global counterparts (e.g., 78% of women vs 54% globally; 73% of men vs 51% globally). For Japan, Danish men are higher than global men (72% vs 63%), while Danish women sit close to global women (62% vs 65%). By age, confidence in Europe runs high across cohorts (high 70s / mid 70s / low 70s in Denmark vs high 50s / ~50 / low 50s globally), and Japan shows a similar Danish premium.
Overall, Denmark’s conviction is concentrated in Europe and Japan across genders and ages, while a muted US view keeps the broader tone balanced.
Most Danish investors expect to keep their current level of diversification. We’ve asked our client base whether they are most likely to invest in the same, new, or fewer regions, sectors, or asset classes than today.
A majority of Danes plan to stay the course: 59% choose “same” versus 63% globally. Notably, 34% intend to add new areas (vs 27% globally), while only 7% expect to invest in fewer areas (vs 10% globally).
This mix signals a steady but open stance—continuity as the baseline, paired with a slightly higher Danish readiness than globally to add new exposures.
Among women, 54% select “same” and 29% “new” (vs 56%/34% globally), with 17% choosing “fewer” (vs 10% globally). Among men, 59% select same and 35% new (vs 63%/26% globally). By age, Danes increasingly choose new as age rises (about 25% / 33% / 39% vs 31% / 28% / 23% globally).
In sum, Danish investors remain stable in allocation, with a modest tilt toward exploring new areas—particularly among older cohorts—while derisking remains subdued.
Growth optimism is the leading macro driver in Denmark; overvaluation matters less than globally. As the final part of this investor forecast, we asked our clients whether they were considering altering their investment strategy based on:
Growth optimism is Denmark’s clearest signal: 65% say it may influence strategy (vs 54% globally). European defence needs also sits slightly higher than the global result (52% vs 48%). On technology-related themes, responses are lower than global—AI-driven opportunities (50% vs 56%) and AI-related concerns (37% vs 53%)—and overvaluation is a less prominent driver in Denmark (58% vs 69%). Trump’s policy impacts is essentially in line (58% vs 57%).
Altogether, Denmark’s macro profile is defined by stronger growth-led intent, muted AI risk sensitivity, and a comparatively lower focus on valuation than the global sample.
Where Denmark diverges most, gender differences are clear. For growth optimism, 78% of Danish women vs 64% of men say “yes” (global: 56% / 53%). For AI-driven opportunities, Danish women are more responsive than Danish men (68% / 49%) and broadly aligned with global women. By age, European defence needs follows the expected gradient (about 40% / mid 40s / mid 60s in Denmark vs 40% / 46% / 55% globally), while AI-related concerns move in the opposite direction and remain below global across ages.
Overall, Danish investors are selective in how macro drivers shape strategy—most responsive to growth, less so to valuation and AI risks.
The survey was undertaken from 6 February to 1 March 2026. As such, most replies were collected prior to the US and Israel attacks on Iran on 28 February 2026 and thus do not include any considerations about the added uncertainty caused by this conflict, which in many instances may have altered sentiment. The survey asked investors to look at their perception of the financial markets in the six months from 1 April to 30 September. The survey was answered by 184 clients in Denmark.
| Segment | Increase | No Movement | Decrease |
|---|---|---|---|
| All responses | 44.5% | 46.8% | 8.7% |
| Male | 41.3% | 50.0% | 8.7% |
| Female | 63.6% | 27.3% | 9.1% |
| Age 18–35 | 38.9% | 50.0% | 11.1% |
| Age 36–60 | 41.7% | 50.0% | 8.3% |
| Age 61+ | 49.3% | 42.3% | 8.5% |
| Segment | Increase | No Movement | Decrease |
|---|---|---|---|
| All responses | 35.1% | 37.4% | 27.6% |
| Male | 35.6% | 36.9% | 27.5% |
| Female | 33.3% | 37.5% | 29.2% |
| Age 18–35 | 35.3% | 23.5% | 41.2% |
| Age 36–60 | 41.2% | 35.3% | 23.5% |
| Age 61+ | 27.8% | 43.1% | 29.2% |
| Segment | Increase | No Movement | Decrease |
|---|---|---|---|
| All responses | 73.9% | 23.3% | 2.8% |
| Male | 73.0% | 23.7% | 3.3% |
| Female | 78.3% | 21.7% | 0.0% |
| Age 18–35 | 77.8% | 16.7% | 5.6% |
| Age 36–60 | 75.6% | 24.4% | 0.0% |
| Age 61+ | 70.8% | 23.6% | 5.6% |
| Segment | Increase | No Movement | Decrease |
|---|---|---|---|
| All responses | 70.7% | 21.1% | 8.3% |
| Male | 71.7% | 20.0% | 8.3% |
| Female | 61.5% | 30.8% | 7.7% |
| Age 18–35 | 73.3% | 6.7% | 20.0% |
| Age 36–60 | 72.3% | 21.5% | 6.2% |
| Age 61+ | 67.9% | 24.5% | 7.5% |
| Segment | Increase | No Movement | Decrease |
|---|---|---|---|
| All responses | 55.6% | 37.9% | 6.5% |
| Male | 56.4% | 36.9% | 6.7% |
| Female | 52.6% | 42.1% | 5.3% |
| Age 18–35 | 66.7% | 27.8% | 5.6% |
| Age 36–60 | 56.0% | 36.9% | 7.1% |
| Age 61+ | 52.2% | 41.8% | 6.0% |
| Segment | Same | New | Fewer |
|---|---|---|---|
| All responses | 58.7% | 34.2% | 7.1% |
| Male | 58.9% | 35.4% | 5.7% |
| Female | 54.2% | 29.2% | 16.7% |
| Age 18–35 | 70.0% | 25.0% | 5.0% |
| Age 36–60 | 60.7% | 32.6% | 6.7% |
| Age 61+ | 53.3% | 38.7% | 8.0% |
| Segment | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| All responses | 57.8% | 42.2% |
| Male | 58.2% | 41.8% |
| Female | 60.9% | 39.1% |
| Age 18–35 | 55.6% | 44.4% |
| Age 36–60 | 53.8% | 46.3% |
| Age 61+ | 63.2% | 36.8% |
| Segment | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| All responses | 52.3% | 47.7% |
| Male | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Female | 72.7% | 27.3% |
| Age 18–35 | 40.0% | 60.0% |
| Age 36–60 | 45.8% | 54.2% |
| Age 61+ | 63.8% | 36.2% |
| Segment | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| All responses | 50.3% | 49.7% |
| Male | 48.6% | 51.4% |
| Female | 68.4% | 31.6% |
| Age 18–35 | 40.0% | 60.0% |
| Age 36–60 | 51.9% | 48.1% |
| Age 61+ | 51.7% | 48.3% |
| Segment | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| All responses | 36.9% | 63.1% |
| Male | 36.1% | 63.9% |
| Female | 45.5% | 54.5% |
| Age 18–35 | 42.1% | 57.9% |
| Age 36–60 | 37.8% | 62.2% |
| Age 61+ | 34.3% | 65.7% |
| Segment | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| All responses | 64.8% | 35.2% |
| Male | 64.1% | 35.9% |
| Female | 77.8% | 22.2% |
| Age 18–35 | 55.6% | 44.4% |
| Age 36–60 | 65.9% | 34.1% |
| Age 61+ | 66.1% | 33.9% |
| Segment | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| All responses | 57.9% | 42.1% |
| Male | 60.1% | 39.9% |
| Female | 47.4% | 52.6% |
| Age 18–35 | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Age 36–60 | 61.2% | 38.8% |
| Age 61+ | 55.9% | 44.1% |
This material is marketing content and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results.