background image

Meta vs. Alphabet: Has the Tide Turned?

Key points:

  • Meta’s AI-driven ad strategy is delivering stronger returns, while Alphabet’s AI investments face skepticism, especially in Search.
  • Meta’s profitability and cost discipline are outpacing Google, with better operating margins and more efficient capital spending.
  • Risks differ as Meta is heavily dependent on ad revenue and economic cycles, while Alphabet faces a potential DOJ settlement and AI competition in Search.

In the competitive landscape of tech giants, Meta Platforms (META) has recently outperformed Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL), the parent company of Google. The relative stock price of Meta vs. Alphabet has reached a 7-year high, raising the question whether Meta’s outperformance has just began, or has it gone too far?

6_CHCA_Meta 1

Meta’s AI Monetization Justifies its AI Spend

Meta is pouring a massive $65 billion into capital expenditures (capex), primarily for AI infrastructure, and investors are rewarding it. The stock has surged as Meta has effectively leveraged artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance ad targeting and optimize performance, bringing tangible improvements in engagement and revenue growth.

Meanwhile, Alphabet’s $75 billion capital spend rattled investors, given the tangible returns on AI investments have been less evident so far. In fact, investors are concerned that AI-powered search tools such as ChatGPT and Perplexity AI could disrupt Google’s core search advertising model rather than enhance it.

Meta’s Cost Discipline and Soaring Margins

Despite its aggressive AI spending, Meta’s operating margins are soaring. Meta’s 2024 operating margin of 54% is a big jump from 41% in 2022. The company has maintained a stable ratio of capex to operating cash flow, lower than 2021 and 2022 levels, while still seeing strong earnings growth. Meanwhile, Alphabet’s capex growth in 2024 of 63% has outpaced its profit growth of 29%, a sign that its spending isn’t translating into immediate bottom-line gains.

Both companies have made significant cuts to improve efficiency, but Meta’s turnaround feels more dramatic. After its painful “Year of Efficiency” in 2023, Meta has emerged as a leaner, more focused company. Alphabet has also streamlined operations, but regulatory concerns and AI uncertainties still loom over its long-term growth.

6_CHCA_Meta 2
Source: Bloomberg, Saxo

Meta’s Lead in Social Engagement vs. Google’s Search Dependence

Meta owns Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, which remain dominant in user engagement. These platforms generate massive first-party data crucial for ad targeting.

Meanwhile, Google’s core revenue still relies on Search ads, which, while highly profitable, face new challenges from AI-powered search experiences (e.g., ChatGPT, Perplexity AI). If AI-driven answers reduce search queries, it could impact Google’s ad revenue model.

Regulatory Overhangs: Meta Clears Hurdles, Google Faces DOJ Risks

For years, Meta was in the regulatory hot seat, facing scrutiny over data privacy and competition concerns. But in 2024, those worries largely faded. TikTok once posed a major threat, but the regulatory risks surrounding the Chinese app have largely eased.

Alphabet, however, is facing antitrust cases from the US Department of Justice (DOJ) to prevent it from maintaining its monopoly in online search and other areas. If there is no settlement, that could Alphabet’s ability to maintain dominance in search and digital advertising.


What Could Go Wrong for Meta?

  1. Meta’s Economic Dependence: With 98% of its revenue coming from advertising, Meta is highly cyclical. If the economy weakens or unemployment rises, small and medium-sized businesses—the backbone of Meta’s ad revenue—could pull back on spending. Google, by contrast, has a more diversified revenue base, with 22% coming from cloud services, subscriptions, and other sources.
  2. DeepSeek Cheap AI Models Could Shake Things Up: China’s DeepSeek AI project, with a $6 billion spending, could reshape the AI competitive landscape, questioning all of the big capex spenders in the AI space. Meta’s capex growth is projected to outpace profit growth in 2025, raising questions about whether the company can maintain its current efficiency. Alphabet’s capex is also expected to rise faster than profit, but at a slower rate than Meta’s.
  3. YouTube’s AI Growth Potential: YouTube has been one of Alphabet’s brightest spots, with AI-powered content discovery boosting engagement and ad revenue. If this momentum broadens, it could offset some of the challenges in Google’s core search business.
  4. Valuation: How Much More Upside? Alphabet is trading at 20x forward earnings, right around its 5-year average. Meta, in contrast, trades at 27x – way above its 5-year average of 19.5x. This gives more room for Alphabet to expand its multiple compared to Meta.

Bottom Line: The Risk-Reward Balance

Meta has outperformed Alphabet in recent months, fueled by AI-driven ad growth, improving margins, and regulatory tailwinds. But with economic risks, rising capex, and valuation concerns, it may not have unlimited upside from here.

Alphabet, meanwhile, is at a crossroads. If AI enhances its core businesses rather than disrupts them, its lower valuation could make it an attractive long-term play. But if regulatory risks and AI cannibalization persist, it could struggle to keep up.

For now, Wall Street is favoring Meta – but the race is far from over!

Disclaimer

Confidentiality and Usage:
You may not reproduce, distribute, or transmit this material or any portion thereof without prior written permission from Saxo.

Nature of Information:
The information provided herein is based on current market conditions and analysts' opinions, which may reflect personal views of the author, and are subject to change without notice. This material does not include a record of any trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, or endorsement to enter into any transaction in any investment product. Any forecast on the economy, markets and economic trends of the markets provided is not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of the investment product subject of this material.

Responsibility and Liability:
Saxo accepts no liability for any use that may be made of these comments or for any consequences that arise from such use. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

The information provided in this material is solely for information only. It is intended for general circulation and does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person. Accordingly, it should not be relied on or treated as a substitute for specific advice concerning specific situations of any person. Please seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs before you make a commitment to purchase an investment product. In the event that you choose not to seek advice from a financial adviser, you should consider whether any investment product mentioned in this publication is suitable for you.

Notwithstanding the above, insofar as any information provided herein contains research analyses or reports concerning any investment product authored by any foreign research house and is issued or promulgated to a person in Singapore who is not an accredited investor, expert investor, and/or institutional investor, Saxo Capital Market Pte. Ltd. accepts legal responsibility for the contents of this material to the extent required by law. Recipients of such material are to contact Saxo Capital Markets Pte. Ltd. in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material.

Risk Disclosure:
Trading in investment products involve significant risk, including the risk of losing your entire investment. Historical returns are not a guarantee of future returns. Prices can both rise and fall, and there is a risk that you will not get back the money you invested.

Conflicts of interest:
The author may hold positions in the investment products mentioned. The author does not own positions in the underlying investment product exceeding 0.5% of its market capitalisation, save as otherwise declared. The author is not permitted to trade the mentioned investment products within the first 24 hours after the publication of this article.

Saxo maintains partnerships with companies that compensate Saxo for promotional activities conducted on its platform. Additionally, Saxo has agreements with certain partners who provide retrocession contingent upon clients purchasing specific investment products offered by these partners. While Saxo receives compensation from these partnerships, all content is conducted with the intention of providing clients with valuable options and information.

Publication details:
If any listed companies are the subject of the material, the content has not been submitted to the companies in question prior to publication.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.

Saxo Markets
88 Market Street
CapitaSpring #31-01
Singapore 048948

Contact Saxo

Singapore
Singapore

Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd ('Saxo Markets') is a company authorised and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) [Co. Reg. No.: 200601141M ] and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Saxo Bank A/S, headquartered in Denmark. Please refer to our General Business Terms & Risk Warning to consider whether acquiring or continuing to hold financial products is suitable for you, prior to opening an account and investing in a financial product.

Saxo is part of the J. Safra Sarasin Group.

Trading in financial instruments carries various risks, and is not suitable for all investors. Please seek expert advice, and always ensure that you fully understand these risks before trading. Trading in leveraged products such as Margin FX products may result in your losses exceeding your initial deposits. Saxo Markets does not provide financial advice, any information available on this website is ‘general’ in nature and for informational purposes only. Saxo Markets does not take into account an individual’s needs, objectives or financial situation.

The Saxo trading platform has received numerous awards and recognition. For details of these awards and information on awards visit www.home.saxo/en-sg/about-us/awards.

The information or the products and services referred to on this website may be accessed worldwide, however is only intended for distribution to and use by recipients located in countries where such use does not constitute a violation of applicable legislation or regulations. Products and Services offered on this website are not intended for residents of the United States, Malaysia and Japan. Please click here to view our full disclaimer.

This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc, registered in the US and other countries and regions. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.