Outrageous Predictions
Dumb AI triggers trillion-dollar clean-up
Jacob Falkencrone
Global Head of Investment Strategy
Head of Commodity Strategy
Natural gas markets have a habit of reminding investors that, despite years of financialisation and growing global trade, weather still matters. Sometimes, it matters a great deal. Over the past week, well below-normal temperatures across large parts of the northern hemisphere have delivered exactly such a reminder. From the U.S. Midwest and Northeast to Northern and Western Europe, heating demand has surged at a time when supply flexibility is limited. The result has been a rapid repricing of winter risk, led by U.S. natural gas but increasingly echoed across global benchmarks.
In the United States, the current move cannot be explained by demand alone. Central and eastern parts of the country remain locked in a deep freeze, sharply lifting residential and commercial heating demand. As freezing temperatures extend south, producers face growing freeze-off risks. Freeze-offs occur when water solidifies inside pipelines and processing infrastructure, temporarily disrupting gas flows and reducing output. These events tend to emerge precisely when demand peaks, amplifying price moves. The market is therefore being forced to price not just stronger consumption, but also the possibility of reduced supply at the worst possible moment.
This combination helps explain the scale of the recent move. The front-month Henry Hub contract has surged by around 70% in a single week, lifting prices to their highest level since 2022. Such moves are rare, but they are not unprecedented when both sides of the supply–demand balance tighten simultaneously. According to the EIA, U.S. natural gas inventories sit close to the five-year average, suggesting that supply is adequate on paper. However, that offers little comfort in the short term, where infrastructure bottlenecks and freeze-off risks can constrain deliverability just as demand is surging.
Europe is experiencing the same cold-driven demand impulse, but the transmission mechanism differs. Unlike the U.S., where domestic production dominates, Europe increasingly relies on LNG as the marginal source of supply. When temperatures drop and demand rises, European buyers must compete in the global LNG market, particularly with Asia.
That competition has intensified in recent weeks. With heating demand firm and storage withdrawals accelerating, European buyers have been forced to pay up to secure supply. Earlier today, EU TTF gas prices spiked to EUR 41.9 per MWh (USD 14.25 per MMBtu), marking a roughly 40% rally in just two weeks, before easing back below EUR 40. Even so, the move underlines how quickly global LNG linkages transmit regional stress. It is also worth noting that, despite the recent surge, European gas prices remain around 22% below levels seen a year ago.
This dynamic underscores a structural shift in gas markets. While benchmarks such as Henry Hub and TTF remain regionally defined, the marginal price is increasingly set globally. When cold weather affects multiple consuming regions at once, LNG becomes the clearing mechanism, and prices adjust until cargoes are redirected to where they are most urgently needed. The impact is being felt particularly acutely in Europe, where underground storage levels have fallen to around 48%, compared with roughly 60% at the same point last year.
One of the more notable cross-asset effects has been in foreign exchange. Norway, a major exporter of pipeline gas to Europe, stands to benefit from higher European gas prices through improved export revenues and terms of trade. The Norwegian krone has strengthened to a three-month high against the euro, reflecting this dynamic.
From a technical perspective, the move has brought EUR/NOK close to levels that may signal a downside break, suggesting markets are beginning to price in relative support for the krone. While this does not yet constitute a structural shift, it highlights how energy price shocks can quickly spill over into currency markets.
Equity performance over the past week mirrors developments in commodity markets. As shown in the accompanying table, gas producers and gas-exposed energy companies have been among the strongest performers. Several U.S. gas producers and LNG-related names posted solid gains, outperforming the broader energy sector.
Energy-focused ETFs with exposure to exploration and production have also benefited, offering diversified access to the theme. However, the dispersion within the sector is a reminder that volatility can reverse quickly once weather risks fade or supply normalises.
The durability of the current move will largely depend on the duration of the cold spell and the extent of any damage it causes to infrastructure. A continuation of below-normal temperatures into February would keep the winter risk premium elevated, while a return toward seasonal norms would likely see prices retreat relatively quickly as the market looks ahead to spring. Notably, the April natural gas contract—the first month of the injection season—currently trades around USD 1.9, or roughly 35% below the February contract.
Recent price action offers a clear illustration of how interconnected natural gas markets have become. A deep freeze in the U.S. can send Henry Hub sharply higher, while cold weather across Europe and parts of Asia intensifies competition for LNG and tightens global supply. Equity markets respond by rewarding gas producers, and currencies such as the Norwegian krone pick up a relative bid.
In short, natural gas is no longer a purely regional story. It is a global market linked by weather, LNG flows, and limited spare capacity. When demand surges unexpectedly and flexibility is scarce, prices rarely adjust smoothly. Instead, they reprice abruptly, leaving little margin for error for policymakers, utilities, and investors alike.
| More from the author |
|---|
|