Outrageous Predictions
Carry trade unwind brings USD/JPY to 100 and Japan’s next asset bubble
Charu Chanana
Chief Investment Strategist
Head of Commodity Strategy
Venezuelan supply losses are real and immediate, offering short-term support to crude prices despite a soft global balance.
The market is not pricing a fast supply comeback, and for good reason: rebuilding Venezuela’s oil sector would take years and tens of billions of dollars.
Medium-term downside risk only emerges if political stability, sanctions relief, and large-scale US investment align — a scenario that remains highly uncertain.
OPEC+ spare capacity, macro growth concerns, and Iran-related risks continue to anchor price action, preventing a disorderly repricing in either direction.
Prices slide as glut narrative strengthens amid developments in Venezuela
Oil prices weakened into the start of the week, with Brent sliding toward USD 60 per barrel and WTI trading below USD 57, both hovering near five-year lows. The trigger being the US capture of Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro, changing the narrative on Venezuelan production from current disruptions amid the imposition of a full oil embargo and a de facto tanker blockade, towards speculation the change over time will lead to increased supply.
In addition, OPEC+ over the weekend reaffirmed its decision to keep production policy unchanged through the first quarter, reinforcing the view that supply remains ample elsewhere despite the short-term disruption of Venezuelan barrels. At the same time, unrest in Iran and the persistent risk of Middle East disruptions continue to provide a partial offset to downside pressure, limiting the scope for a deeper sell-off.
The most important point for oil markets is also the most widely misunderstood, Venezuela does not mean more oil supply — at least not anytime soon.
Following the US announcement of a full oil embargo, Venezuela’s state-run producer PDVSA has been forced to cut production sharply as storage fills and exports grind to a halt. With tankers blocked and cargoes seized, crude has become stranded at ports.
Production has reportedly collapsed from around 1.1 million barrels per day in November to less than 500,000 barrels per day last month. Output cuts are spreading across multiple joint ventures, including operations involving Chevron and China National Petroleum Corporation. For the global oil market, the impact of this relatively small given the expected short-term nature of this disruption.
So far, Venezuela remains a contained disruption. Lost barrels are meaningful, but they are partially offset by spare capacity elsewhere and by an overhang of supply following months of rising production, which continues to drive the narrative of an oversupplied market into 2026 and possibly beyond. Until there is evidence that disruption spreads — most notably via Iran following weeks of domestic unrest, or through broader geopolitical escalation — crude is likely to continue trading the bigger global balance rather than a single-country shock.
The rebuild myth: why a supply comeback is a long way off
The biggest misconception in the market narrative right now is that a political shift automatically unlocks Venezuelan supply. Even under a cooperative government, meaningful production growth would require:
This is a multi-year repair and investment cycle, not a quick restart. Venezuela’s oil sector is capital-starved, infrastructure-constrained, and operationally degraded after years of underinvestment and sanctions. Even US oil majors would need sustained price signals, stable governance, and durable sanctions relief before committing meaningful capital. In other words, Venezuela represents optionality, not imminent supply.
When, if ever, does Venezuela become bearish for oil?
There is a bearish scenario — but it sits firmly in the medium term and requires several conditions to align:
If — and it remains a big if — these conditions are met, Venezuela could eventually re-emerge as a meaningful source of incremental supply. At that point, the narrative would shift from disruption to capacity growth, and oil markets would need to reassess the longer-term balance. By then, however, today’s focus on a supply glut may have given way to renewed concerns about tightness amid continued demand growth, high depletion rates, stalling non-OPEC+ supply growth, and a sharp reduction in OPEC spare capacity. In that scenario, additional barrels from Venezuela would not weigh on prices but instead help prevent them from spiking higher.
Bottom line: near-term disruption, longer-term optionality
For now, the oil market is trading crude with a negative bias given Trump's renewed call to action by U.S. oil companies in Venezuela, partly offset by near-term supply disruptions as Venezuelan barrels are disappearing faster than they can be replaced, even as broader macro and OPEC+ dynamics cap upside.
Until Venezuela transitions from crisis to a credible reinvestment story, its direct impact on oil prices is likely to remain limited. However, the perception of future supply growth may still be enough in the short term to pressure sentiment, potentially seeing Brent and WTI break key support levels and trigger a technically driven move toward the mid-to-low USD 50s. Such a move could in turn prompt OPEC+ to reassess its strategy in order to stabilise prices, while slowing non-OPEC+ production growth would help lay the groundwork for a subsequent rebound.
| More from the author |
|---|
|