Quarterly Outlook
Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally
Jacob Falkencrone
Global Head of Investment Strategy
Investor Content Strategist
Market pricing has moved aggressively in favour of a September rate cut by the Federal Reserve, after a weak July jobs report and ugly revisions to May and June signalled the US labour market may finally be cracking under the pressure of tariffs. The data pushed the US closer to stagflationary territory, which has been a long-term fear among bears; ie that we end up with a 1970s market that drifts sideways. So far, the market has held up and looked beyond the tariff risks, but we may at last be seeing the hard data finally catch up with the soft survey data that has indicated sentiment is weakening. Front-loading by companies to avoid tariffs and corporates wearing the associated higher costs by maintaining flat pricing may have masked the real impact - but this may be changing.
The rally on Monday in the US stock market was interesting since it suggested investors either have very short memories and/or little concerns about the economy, and figure that as usual the Fed will come to the rescue. But this is not necessarily going to be the case for a couple of reasons.
Tariff Spectre
Effective US tariff rates are set to rise above 15%, with ongoing uncertainty around particular sectors, and some countries. We note Switzerland has been hit with an apparently very high rate of 39% that has produced some idiosyncratic moves for its equity market. There were also steep rates for Taiwan, Brazil, Canada and India. And despite some relief at the EU’s 15% tariff rate, there are mounting concerns about how this will impact exports and earnings growth for Europe’s big corporations. The Eurozone Sentix Investor Confidence Index tumbled to -3.7 in August following July’s 4.5, turning negative for the first time in four months.
The impact of tariffs is felt on both sides of the trade: US consumers will face an overall effective tariff rate of 18.3%, according to Yale researchers, the highest since 1934. After consumption shifts, the average tariff rate will be 17.3%, the highest since 1935, they write. Tariff shocks may be receding in terms Trump’s erratic policy announcements, but the impact of tariffs on the economies of the US and its trading partners is starting to show up.
For stocks the question is how much tariffs hit the E part of EPS. Global earnings forecasts have been cut since April but the market rally since the Liberation Day selloff has left markets looking complacent and exposed. While forecasts for EPS growth have been trimmed, they may still be overly optimistic in terms of the impact of tariffs. The recent rally, combined with emerging signs of an economic slowdown and lingering tariff uncertainty raises doubts about the short-term upside potential in equity markets, particularly in the US. Trump's new tariffs come into effect on 7 August.
Main St vs Wall St
Whilst Wall Street and Silicon Valley have been riding high, the rest of the US economy has been struggling a bit more.
Overall, with about two-thirds of the S&P 500 having reported second quarter earnings this season, 82% have reported actual EPS above lowered estimates, according to FactSet. But while booming AI spend and tech earnings suggest all is well, Consumer Staples earnings are down 0.1% and Materials are down 5%. Companies are reporting pressure on margins even though revenues are rising – a sign that they are yet to pass on additional costs like tariffs onto the consumer yet.
Over the weekend, Berkshire Hathaway sounded gloomy as it reported a 4% drop in earnings from its wholly-owned businesses (ie not its equity investments.) “The pace of changes in these events, including tensions from developing international trade policies and tariffs, accelerated through the first six months of 2025,” Berkshire said. “Considerable uncertainty remains as to the ultimate outcome of these events.”
“It is reasonably possible there could be adverse consequences on most, if not all, of our operating businesses, as well as on our investments in equity securities, which could significantly affect our future results,” the company added.
The US is on the precipice of recession, according to Moody’s Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi, citing the combination of restrictive immigration policy and tariffs.
Reports of a US recession have been greatly exaggerated in the past so I would caution about just how this slowdown translates in the hard data in the coming months. Corporate tax cuts are boosting earnings already. But there are clearly signs to worry.
Last week’s US GDP report showed an economy growing at an annualised rate of 1.1% in the first half, down from 2.9% in the preceding six-month period. Slowdown is not recession, and for investors this is likely to be of great importance for how the equity markets perform in the coming months.
What sort of cut we get matters a lot
The market thinks the Fed is ready to act, but this may not be enough this time. The stock market doesn’t bottom until after the Fed starts cutting is a thing you hear all the time. But this is only really true in a recession. So, what the Fed does is arguably less important than what the economy does.
Types of Fed cut
Panic – like 2020, or the crash of 1987, the market tends to rally after mainly fear-drive trough. In ‘87, the S&P 500 rallied over 16% in the next 12 months, and 26% over the next three years after the cut.
Normalisation – until tariffs appeared this was the playbook for Powell as he sought to pull off a soft landing with a steady series of cuts as predecessor Alan Greenspan did in 1995, which was a slow trimming to prevent overheating. By 1998 the S&P 500 was up 114% three years after the first cut.
Recession – increasingly, the worry is that if the Fed cuts in September it’s a recession cut. (This is debatable since you could argue we are technically still in the easing cycle started last year).
In 2001 (dotcom) and 2007 (financial crisis) the market bottomed long after the first rate cuts were made. In the dotcom bust the S&P 500 was down over 12% 12 months after the first cut, while in 2007 the broad market remained 22% down a year later. Three years after the 2001 recession cut the market was 14% down, while three years after the financial crisis cut of 2007 the market was 24% lower. We are seeing signs of a slowdown in the US economy, as Friday’s labour market report indicated. But we have a couple of problems in assuming that this means the Fed is about to race to cut at its next policy meeting in September.
First, there is a big question mark over the quality of the data. But leaving that to one side, we are seeing soft numbers and a trend for downward revisions that is a hallmark of pre-recession era.
But, immigration policy is changing the nature of the Fed’s full employment mandate. Essentially, lower labour supply will mean a lower rate of job creation. Slower nonfarm payrolls growth does not tell the whole picture and does not explain how the US economy is doing vis-a-vis the Fed’s mandate.
And we have inflation. Cleveland Fed President Hammack outlined the way the Fed is looking at this: is the jobs market or inflation further away from target? This question will be answered in the coming weeks, but my sense is that still it’s the inflation number that is a more pressing concern for chairman Powell and the bulk of the FOMC.
A few thoughts on stocks
Following the rally to the all-time highs just before the jobs report and 1 August tariff deadline, the S&P 500 valuation appeared stretched in historical terms at 23x earnings, whereas the pullback in Europe has allowed for the market to recover its poise and look less stretched on near-term multiples. The Stoxx 50 still trades below its Feb highs despite the long Europe narrative since Liberation Day.The UK, despite a record high for the FTSE 100, trades at an historic discount to peers and has highest dividend yield relative to peers. It’s also a lot less sensitive to trade policy than Europe.
Looking at sectors of the stock market, in a recession often the best-performing corners to hide include defensive sectors such as Utilities, Healthcare and Consumer Staples.
Finally, seasonality is important as we head into August – traditionally the second-worst month of the year for the Nasdaq Composite. In post-election years it’s the worst month for the Dow Jones and second worst for the S&P 500, according to the Stock Trader’s Almanac.
Key takeaways and other considerations
Tariff policy shocks may be receding, but the impact of levies is starting to be felt and is producing second-order effects
The US economy is slowing down, but we cannot reliably say how much and whether a recession is coming
Market pricing has shifted towards the Federal Reserve cutting rates in September, but policymakers are still mindful of inflation risks
Rate cuts tend to support stock market performance but in the case of a recession it can take a lot longer – we may be moving from a process of policy normalisation to recession, which is usually bad for returns
Against these headwinds, Trump’s tax cuts are also starting to show up, boosting US corporate free cash flow