Outrageous Predictions
Executive Summary: Outrageous Predictions 2026
Saxo Group
Investment Strategist
Artificial intelligence spending stays strong, but energy and rates can decide how long optimism lasts.
Geopolitics matters most when it moves inflation, not when it moves your mood.
A roadmap is a repeatable process: rebalance, automate, and watch a few signals calmly.
On 5 January 2026, markets open the year in a confident mood. Investors lean back into risk and assume the economic engine keeps running, even if it does not roar. They also keep one eye on interest rates, hoping cuts arrive later in the year.
Shares rise broadly, and oil rises too. That combination matters because it hints at the real story behind the headlines. Artificial intelligence keeps spending and confidence moving. But the AI boom is not just software and hype. It needs chips, data centres, electricity, and people, and those inputs cost money.
So 2026 starts with a simple tension: the growth story looks strong, but the bill may arrive later, and it rarely comes with a friendly price tag.
The optimistic view for 2026 is simple: investment stays strong, companies keep finding productivity gains, and inflation cools slowly enough for interest rates to drift lower over time. In that world, equities can still do fine, even if returns look less spectacular than the last sprint.
BlackRock’s Investment Institute leans into this “investment-led growth” idea. The point is not that AI is magic. The point is that AI is capital-hungry. It pulls forward spending on data centres, semiconductors, and networks, which supports activity even if the labour market cools.
Goldman Sachs’ 2026 outlook hub makes the same idea feel more grounded: base cases tend to be “sturdy growth” rather than boom-or-bust drama. That matters for long-term investors because steady growth usually gives companies time to grow earnings, and earnings are the long-term fuel for share prices.
Here is the key nuance for 2026: markets can be “right” about AI and still be “too excited” about the price they pay for it. Valuation is just the price tag on future hopes. If the price tag gets silly, even good news can disappoint.
The overlooked risk is not that AI disappears. It is that AI infrastructure makes inflation stickier than expected, mainly through energy and supply constraints.
A Reuters piece captures the worry clearly: the AI buildout drives demand for chips and data centres, and those data centres need power. Higher demand can push up costs, and if those costs spread, central banks can feel forced to stay tighter for longer.
For equity investors, “higher for longer” rates usually do two things:
1. they reduce the value of far-away profits, which can pressure expensive growth shares, and
2. they make cash and bonds more competitive, which can cool the appetite for risk.
None of this guarantees a bad year. It just changes the rules of what gets rewarded. This is where the “bill arrives later” storyline fits. In 2024 and 2025, the story feels like software and excitement. In 2026, it starts to look like concrete, copper, cooling systems, and electricity contracts. Those are real-world inputs with real-world inflation dynamics.
Geopolitics is a permanent feature now, not a special event. The market reaction to Venezuela on 5 January is a reminder: investors often ignore politics until it moves energy, trade routes, defence spending, or inflation expectations. Then it suddenly becomes “macro”.
Reuters’ 2026 markets watch list highlights the menu of things that can matter this year: central bank credibility, political risk, and the fact that AI remains a dominant driver of sentiment and spending.
For long-term investors, the practical takeaway is boring, which is usually a good sign. You do not need to trade every headline. You do need to recognise when a headline changes the inflation path, because that can change interest rates, and rates change valuations.
A roadmap works best when it tells readers what to do repeatedly, not what to predict once.
Morningstar’s New Year framework is useful here because it focuses on reducing “friction”: unnecessary taxes, idle cash, and accidental risk. In short, the goal is to stop leaking value in small ways that add up.
Use 2026 like a monthly routine rather than a dramatic reset.
If equity markets rise fast again, review concentration: check whether a few positions quietly become “the whole portfolio”.
If inflation stops improving, watch your time horizon: the shorter it is, the more rate shocks can sting.
If AI enthusiasm stays strong, separate theme from price: strong adoption does not guarantee great returns at any valuation.
If volatility returns, lean on automation: keep contributions steady so decisions are not made in a panic.
The first risk is sticky inflation, especially if energy and AI infrastructure costs keep pressure on prices. An early warning sign is central banks turning less confident, even when growth looks fine.
The second risk is a growth scare. This often shows up as weaker hiring, falling confidence, and stress in credit markets. When companies struggle to refinance debt, problems can spread beyond the “hot” sectors.
The third risk is a narrow market. If only a small group of stocks drives returns, the index can look healthy while most investors feel left behind. The warning sign is leadership that gets narrower, not broader.
2026 opens with a familiar feeling: optimism on AI, strong equity momentum, and a sense that the hard part is behind us. That is comforting, and also slightly suspicious, like a calm airport security line.
The year’s repeating storyline is not “AI wins” or “AI fails”. It is “AI spending stays strong, but the bill may arrive later”, via energy costs, inflation stickiness, and interest rates that refuse to play along.
A good roadmap accepts uncertainty and focuses on process: diversify, rebalance, automate, and watch a small set of signals. The goal is not to predict 2026. It is to finish it with your plan intact, and your future self still speaking to you.