Quarterly Outlook
Upending the global order at blinding speed
John J. Hardy
Global Head of Macro Strategy
Head of ESG investments, Saxo Bank.
Summary: DEI is under pressure, facing political backlash, budget reductions, and criticism for being ineffective, divisive, or overreaching. In response, some companies have eliminated their Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. However, many organizations and individuals remain committed to DEI, emphasizing both its ethical importance and its value in driving employee engagement, and business performance.
Note: This content is marketing material.
IntroductionDiversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in the workplace means cultivating an environment that values differences, ensures fair treatment, and provides equal opportunities for all.DEI embodies an ethical and moral dimension, acknowledging that individuals come from diverse backgrounds and that some groups face more substantial challenges than others. The objective is to create an inclusive environment where everyone who wishes to contribute to society is welcomed and supported. By recognizing and valuing these differences, DEI seeks to offer opportunities and assistance to those who need it.
DEI originated in the USA in the 1960’s with the civil rights movement. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it illegal to discriminate based on race and religion and these protections were later extended to include gender equality, economic empowerment, disability rights, and LGBTQ+ rights.
Over the years, DEI has achieved significant milestones and positively impacted organizational culture, employee engagement and customer satisfaction. It has fostered increased innovation and creativity, while also enhancing the brand and reputation of companies that prioritize DEI. A growing number of companies have adopted DEI initiatives, understanding that DEI makes good business sense as it bring diverse perspectives and helps in attracting and retaining talent. According to McKinsey & Company‘s 2023 report, there is a strong positive correlation between leadership diversity and higher financial returns. Companies that focus on diversity tend to have higher employee engagement, better retention rates, and improved financial performance. Notable examples include Alphabet, Cisco and PepsiCo.
DEI currently face significant challenges. The US president, Donald Trump has been vocal about his opposition and has signed multiple executive orders to end DEI-related practices in federal contracting and hiring. The Trump administration is rolling back DEI initiatives, making it illegal in the US to favour individuals based on gender or race. Essentially, companies may face legal actions if their DEI programs are deemed discriminatory, putting pressure on US companies to eliminate DEI programs and potentially reducing diversity and inclusion efforts in the workplace. As a result, companies such as Meta, Amazon, and BlackRock have scaled back or altogether eliminated their DEI programs, reduced resources and cut DEI budgets.
This wave of opposition to DEI is also gradually affecting other regions. Several European companies have received letters from the US government warning that Trump's executive order banning “illegal” DEI programs is not confined to the US but would be enforced internationally. This opposition to DEI is raising concerns about potential negative impacts on workplace culture and employee satisfaction.
It’s striking that the terms “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion” which generally carry positive connotations, are now at the centre of intense debate. Has DEI contributed to its own backlash? Many critics believe so. They argue that its rapid expansion was more reactive than strategic, and that many organizations rushed to implement initiatives that lacked clear goals, accountability, or alignment with business priorities.
Others contend that DEI efforts undermine merit-based hiring and promotion by prioritizing identity characteristics over qualifications or performance. This has led to perceptions of unfairness. In certain instances, DEI has been perceived as favouring certain groups while excluding others, fostering a sense of division—an “us vs. them” dynamic, particularly along gender lines, with some men feeling alienated or disadvantaged.
These critiques do not invalidate the fundamental values and principles of DEI but reflect real tensions that must be acknowledged. They underscore the need for open dialogue to address misconceptions and ensure that DEI efforts are truly inclusive of all voices—including those who may have historically been favoured.
The case for DEI remains compelling. Despite recent setbacks and competing priorities, the strategic importance of DEI remains evident, with benefits including:
While challenges and political pressures persist, many companies still recognize the value of DEI and organizations like Apple, Microsoft and Deutsche Bank continue to support DEI initiatives. Similarly, shareholders are expressing their continued support for DEI, as evidenced by overwhelming votes to maintain DEI initiatives at companies like Goldman Sachs and Apple recently. In Europe, several leaders have stated their intention to defend their businesses and values against American interference.
The journey toward diversity, equity, and inclusion is dynamic and evolving. In our interconnected world, companies often serve a diverse customer base and employ individuals across a wide range of ages, genders, races, sexual orientations and religious backgrounds. Consequently, the need for diverse perspectives, inclusive systems and equitable opportunities, have never been more critical. In today’s climate, where DEI is under threat, it is our shared responsibility, as organizations and individuals, to engage in dialogue and uphold its principles by: Ongoing support and active commitment are crucial to ensuring meaningful and continued progress towards inclusive and equitable workplaces. You can explore Saxo’s DEI champions theme to find a list of global companies that demonstrate sustained efforts to weave DEI into their operational DNA. Note that the global DEI landscape is dynamic, and over time, the selected companies may modify specific aspects of their DEI programs.Conclusion
How to invest in DEI