ESG article_ is DEI dying 1280x720 2

Is DEI dying

ESG 4 minutes to read
Ida Kassa web profile 400x400
Ida Kassa Johannesen

Head of ESG investments, Saxo Bank.

Summary:  DEI is under pressure, facing political backlash, budget reductions, and criticism for being ineffective, divisive, or overreaching. In response, some companies have eliminated their Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. However, many organizations and individuals remain committed to DEI, emphasizing both its ethical importance and its value in driving employee engagement, and business performance.


Note: This content is marketing material.

Introduction

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in the workplace means cultivating an environment that values differences, ensures fair treatment, and provides equal opportunities for all.

  • Diversity encompasses differences such as gender, race, religion, sexual orientation and age
  • Equity entails treating everyone fairly and equitably
  • Inclusion is about cultivating an environment where everyone feels valued and has a sense of belonging.

DEI embodies an ethical and moral dimension, acknowledging that individuals come from diverse backgrounds and that some groups face more substantial challenges than others. The objective is to create an inclusive environment where everyone who wishes to contribute to society is welcomed and supported. By recognizing and valuing these differences, DEI seeks to offer opportunities and assistance to those who need it.

The rise of DEI

DEI originated in the USA in the 1960’s with the civil rights movement. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it illegal to discriminate based on race and religion and these protections were later extended to include gender equality, economic empowerment, disability rights, and LGBTQ+ rights. 

Over the years, DEI has achieved significant milestones and positively impacted organizational culture, employee engagement and customer satisfaction. It has fostered increased innovation and creativity, while also enhancing the brand and reputation of companies that prioritize DEI. A growing number of companies have adopted DEI initiatives, understanding that DEI makes good business sense as it bring diverse perspectives and helps in attracting and retaining talent. According to McKinsey & Company‘s 2023 report, there is a strong positive correlation between leadership diversity and higher financial returns. Companies that focus on diversity tend to have higher employee engagement, better retention rates, and improved financial performance. Notable examples include Alphabet, Cisco and PepsiCo.

The fall of DEI

DEI currently face significant challenges. The US president, Donald Trump has been vocal about his opposition and has signed multiple executive orders to end DEI-related practices in federal contracting and hiring. The Trump administration is rolling back DEI initiatives, making it illegal in the US to favour individuals based on gender or race. Essentially, companies may face legal actions if their DEI programs are deemed discriminatory, putting pressure on US companies to eliminate DEI programs and potentially reducing diversity and inclusion efforts in the workplace. As a result, companies such as Meta, Amazon, and BlackRock have scaled back or altogether eliminated their DEI programs, reduced resources and cut DEI budgets. 

This wave of opposition to DEI is also gradually affecting other regions. Several European companies have received letters from the US government warning that Trump's executive order banning “illegal” DEI programs is not confined to the US but would be enforced internationally. This opposition to DEI is raising concerns about potential negative impacts on workplace culture and employee satisfaction.

Did DEI go too far?

It’s striking that the terms “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion” which generally carry positive connotations, are now at the centre of intense debate. Has DEI contributed to its own backlash? Many critics believe so. They argue that its rapid expansion was more reactive than strategic, and that many organizations rushed to implement initiatives that lacked clear goals, accountability, or alignment with business priorities.

Others contend that DEI efforts undermine merit-based hiring and promotion by prioritizing identity characteristics over qualifications or performance. This has led to perceptions of unfairness. In certain instances, DEI has been perceived as favouring certain groups while excluding others, fostering a sense of division—an “us vs. them” dynamic, particularly along gender lines, with some men feeling alienated or disadvantaged.

These critiques do not invalidate the fundamental values and principles of DEI but reflect real tensions that must be acknowledged. They underscore the need for open dialogue to address misconceptions and ensure that DEI efforts are truly inclusive of all voices—including those who may have historically been favoured.

So what’s in store for DEI?

The case for DEI remains compelling. Despite recent setbacks and competing priorities, the strategic importance of DEI remains evident, with benefits including:

  • Enhanced Innovation and Creativity: Diverse teams generate more original ideas and are better equipped to solve complex problems.
  • Better Decision-Making: Inclusive environments reflect a globalized market and foster broader perspectives, leading to more effective and balanced decisions.
  • Talent Attraction and Retention: A strong DEI culture helps attracts and retain talent, and improves employee engagement and loyalty.
  • Improved Financial Performance: Numerous studies have shown that companies with diverse leadership and inclusive practices tend to outperform their peers financially.
  • Ethical and social responsibility: DEI aligns with broader societal values and expectations of fairness and equality. 

While challenges and political pressures persist, many companies still recognize the value of DEI and organizations like Apple, Microsoft and Deutsche Bank continue to support DEI initiatives. Similarly, shareholders are expressing their continued support for DEI, as evidenced by overwhelming votes to maintain DEI initiatives at companies like Goldman Sachs and Apple recently. In Europe, several leaders have stated their intention to defend their businesses and values against American interference.    

    ESG article_ is DEI dying 1280x720 1

    Conclusion

    The journey toward diversity, equity, and inclusion is dynamic and evolving. In our interconnected world, companies often serve a diverse customer base and employ individuals across a wide range of ages, genders, races, sexual orientations and religious backgrounds. Consequently, the need for diverse perspectives, inclusive systems and equitable opportunities, have never been more critical.

    In today’s climate, where DEI is under threat, it is our shared responsibility, as organizations and individuals, to engage in dialogue and uphold its principles by:

    • Embedding DEI into organizational strategy and culture
    • Educating ourselves, challenging biases and supporting others who might need a hand

    Ongoing support and active commitment are crucial to ensuring meaningful and continued progress towards inclusive and equitable workplaces. 

    How to invest in DEI

    You can explore Saxo’s DEI champions theme to find a list of global companies that demonstrate sustained efforts to weave DEI into their operational DNA. Note that the global DEI landscape is dynamic, and over time, the selected companies may modify specific aspects of their DEI programs.

    Before making any investments, it is important to consider your investment objectives, risk tolerance, and time horizon, and review the available information about the product on the platform.

    Quarterly Outlook

    01 /

    • Upending the global order at blinding speed

      Quarterly Outlook

      Upending the global order at blinding speed

      John J. Hardy

      Global Head of Macro Strategy

      We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ...
    • Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

      Quarterly Outlook

      Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

      Charu Chanana

      Chief Investment Strategist

    • Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

      Quarterly Outlook

      Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

      Jacob Falkencrone

      Global Head of Investment Strategy

    • Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

      Quarterly Outlook

      Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

      Ole Hansen

      Head of Commodity Strategy

    • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

      Quarterly Outlook

      Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

      John J. Hardy

      Global Head of Macro Strategy

    • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

      Quarterly Outlook

      Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

      Charu Chanana

      Chief Investment Strategist

    • China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

      Quarterly Outlook

      China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

      Charu Chanana

      Chief Investment Strategist

    • Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

      Quarterly Outlook

      Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

      Ole Hansen

      Head of Commodity Strategy

    • FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

      Quarterly Outlook

      FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

      John J. Hardy

      Global Head of Macro Strategy

    • Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

      Quarterly Outlook

      Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

      Althea Spinozzi

      Head of Fixed Income Strategy

    Content disclaimer

    None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

    Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

    Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

    Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.

    Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
    Philip Heymans Alle 15
    2900
    Hellerup
    Denmark

    Contact Saxo

    Select region

    International
    International

    All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

    Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

    Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.