Details Cookies
Important margin product information

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 75% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs, FX or any of our other products work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Cookie policy

This website uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience by enabling, optimising and analysing site operations, as well as to provide personalised ad content and allow you to connect to social media. By choosing “Accept all” you consent to the use of cookies and the related processing of personal data. Select “Manage consent” to manage your consent preferences. You can change your preferences or retract your consent at any time via the cookie policy page. Please view our cookie policy here and our privacy policy here

WCU: Best quarter in three years on oil, metals strength WCU: Best quarter in three years on oil, metals strength WCU: Best quarter in three years on oil, metals strength

WCU: Best quarter in three years on oil, metals strength

Commodities 10 minutes to read
Ole Hansen

Head of Commodity Strategy

Summary:  The first quarter of 2019 was the strongest in three years for the commodities sector as the global turnaround in central bank policy allowed growth-dependent energy and metals assets to surge past fears of an incoming slowdown.

The commodity sector, just like most other asset classes, reported strong gains during the first quarter of 2019. The near-7% return in the Bloomberg Commodity Index was the best since Q2’16 when a rally across all three sectors supported a double-digit gain. 

Several markets, including commodities, began the year on the defensive with growth concerns and Federal Reserve-led liquidity tightening raising concerns about the prospects for 2019. The year, however, was only a few days old before global policy panic set in with the Fed hitting the pause button in early January before calling a halt to further quantitative tightening at the end of the quarter. 

As a result, the market has gone from expecting two rate hikes to an 80% probability of a cut before year-end. 

The Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank followed suit with its own measures, while in China the government stepped in with various policy moves to stabilise its economy. The chance of a trade deal between US and China helped sentiment further. 

Growth concerns and a flattening yield curve (which raises the risk of recession) provided some sporadic support to precious metals which otherwise were held down by surging equities and the consequent reduced demand for safe-havens and diversification. 

Instead, it was the growth-dependent sectors of energy and industrial metals that provided most of the gains. Surging stock markets, Opec production cuts and Chinese stimulus helped to support a strong quarter for the energy and industrial metal sectors. 
Bloomberg Commodity Index
Palladium reached a record high on tight supply before suffering a 17% setback on speculative profit-taking.

The agriculture sector was mixed with the US-China trade dispute as well as surging stocks providing continued headwinds. Some uncertainty about growing conditions ahead of the Northern Hemisphere Q2 planting season, however, provided some support. Arabica coffee hit a 14-year low as it continued to suffer from a weak Brazilian real and high Brazil output. 

The uncertainty related to the outlook for agricultural commodities helped drive a record hedge fund short across key agriculture commodities. This development combined with a potential change in the fundamental and/or technical outlook could provide the sector with the tailwind to make up for lost ground into the second quarter. 

The chart below shows the net position held by hedge funds across key commodity futures:
Funds positioning
During the past week, gold showed renewed signs of investor apathy as the price once again dropped back below $1,300/oz. The lack of a bullish tailwind following the recent uber-dovish Federal Open Market Committee statement and the subsequent drop in bond yields is a concern. The circumstance highlights how gold needs support from all of its three main engines – lower stocks, bond yields, and USD – in order to attempt another run to the upside. 

While falling bond yields and an 80% probability of a US rate cut before year-end are supportive, the other two engines – stocks and the dollar – have both been sputtering. Stable to higher stocks reduce the demand for alternative or safe-haven assets while the dollar has continued to recover from its post-FOMC sell-off. Growth concerns remain a key focus and one that could reduce the appeal for stocks if it deteriorates, as well as weakening the dollar and lending a hand to gold.

Underlying demand through exchange-traded products remains healthy with total holdings on the rise since early March. Hedge funds, meanwhile, continue to struggle and constantly have to adjust their leveraged exposure. The increase in bullish gold bets in the run-up to, and immediate aftermath of, the March 20 FOMC meeting and subsequent price drop has left them underwater with most of that position. 

With the uptrend from early March broken, the risk of a deeper correction has once again emerged. The key level of support remains around $1275/oz, the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement and the January low. 
After rallying 93% since August, palladium once again managed to attract a great deal of attention as it headed for its biggest weekly decline in more than three years. The 17% top-to-bottom correction was another reminder that nothing ever goes in a straight line, no matter how strong the fundamental support might be. The strong rally and momentum had attracted a great deal of speculative investors and they will only look at the price behaviour and not underlying fundamentals. 

Once $1,500/oz broke, the floodgate opened and the dismal liquidity in this metal became apparent. However, finding support ahead of $1,285/oz on the June futures tells us that this was nothing more than a weak correction within a strong uptrend, no matter how painful it seemed. 
Source: Saxo Bank
WTI crude oil is heading for its best quarter in a decade, and spent the week trying to break above $60/barrel on route to $62/b, its 200-day moving average. President Trump tried again to send the price lower via Twitter when he once again asked Opec - this time politely -  to provide some additional barrels. He justified his statement by citing fragile global markets; the market instead saw the request as a sign that the administration is preparing to tighten the screws on Iran when current waivers come up for renewal at the beginning of May.

Opec and Russia are for various reasons very unlikely to reverse the current course of keeping production tight. The Q4 collapse last year occurred after Opec, led by Saudi Arabia, ramped up production in the belief that Iranian exports would collapse. Instead they were wrong-footed by Trump’s waivers which helped trigger the December collapse.

With supply being cut, the biggest risk to oil is renewed worries about global growth and demand. This focus, however, will be kept down as long global stocks continue to rally like they did this past week on renewed trade deal and rate cut hopes. 
Crude oil
Source: Saxo Bank


The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (
Full disclaimer (
Full disclaimer (

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15

Contact Saxo

Select region


Trade responsibly
All trading carries risk. Read more. To help you understand the risks involved we have put together a series of Key Information Documents (KIDs) highlighting the risks and rewards related to each product. Read more

This website can be accessed worldwide however the information on the website is related to Saxo Bank A/S and is not specific to any entity of Saxo Bank Group. All clients will directly engage with Saxo Bank A/S and all client agreements will be entered into with Saxo Bank A/S and thus governed by Danish Law.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc, registered in the US and other countries and regions. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.