The End Game has arrived
Shocks from covid and the war in Ukraine have forced the global financial and political world to change, but what will the end game be?
You can access both of our platforms from a single Saxo account.
WCU: Best quarter in three years on oil, metals strength
Ole Hansen
Head of Commodity Strategy
Summary: The first quarter of 2019 was the strongest in three years for the commodities sector as the global turnaround in central bank policy allowed growth-dependent energy and metals assets to surge past fears of an incoming slowdown.
The commodity sector, just like most other asset classes, reported strong gains during the first quarter of 2019. The near-7% return in the Bloomberg Commodity Index was the best since Q2’16 when a rally across all three sectors supported a double-digit gain.
Several markets, including commodities, began the year on the defensive with growth concerns and Federal Reserve-led liquidity tightening raising concerns about the prospects for 2019. The year, however, was only a few days old before global policy panic set in with the Fed hitting the pause button in early January before calling a halt to further quantitative tightening at the end of the quarter.
As a result, the market has gone from expecting two rate hikes to an 80% probability of a cut before year-end.
The Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank followed suit with its own measures, while in China the government stepped in with various policy moves to stabilise its economy. The chance of a trade deal between US and China helped sentiment further.
Growth concerns and a flattening yield curve (which raises the risk of recession) provided some sporadic support to precious metals which otherwise were held down by surging equities and the consequent reduced demand for safe-havens and diversification.
Instead, it was the growth-dependent sectors of energy and industrial metals that provided most of the gains. Surging stock markets, Opec production cuts and Chinese stimulus helped to support a strong quarter for the energy and industrial metal sectors.
Several markets, including commodities, began the year on the defensive with growth concerns and Federal Reserve-led liquidity tightening raising concerns about the prospects for 2019. The year, however, was only a few days old before global policy panic set in with the Fed hitting the pause button in early January before calling a halt to further quantitative tightening at the end of the quarter.
As a result, the market has gone from expecting two rate hikes to an 80% probability of a cut before year-end.
The Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank followed suit with its own measures, while in China the government stepped in with various policy moves to stabilise its economy. The chance of a trade deal between US and China helped sentiment further.
Growth concerns and a flattening yield curve (which raises the risk of recession) provided some sporadic support to precious metals which otherwise were held down by surging equities and the consequent reduced demand for safe-havens and diversification.
Instead, it was the growth-dependent sectors of energy and industrial metals that provided most of the gains. Surging stock markets, Opec production cuts and Chinese stimulus helped to support a strong quarter for the energy and industrial metal sectors.
Palladium reached a record high on tight supply before suffering a 17% setback on speculative profit-taking.
The agriculture sector was mixed with the US-China trade dispute as well as surging stocks providing continued headwinds. Some uncertainty about growing conditions ahead of the Northern Hemisphere Q2 planting season, however, provided some support. Arabica coffee hit a 14-year low as it continued to suffer from a weak Brazilian real and high Brazil output.
The uncertainty related to the outlook for agricultural commodities helped drive a record hedge fund short across key agriculture commodities. This development combined with a potential change in the fundamental and/or technical outlook could provide the sector with the tailwind to make up for lost ground into the second quarter.
The chart below shows the net position held by hedge funds across key commodity futures:
The agriculture sector was mixed with the US-China trade dispute as well as surging stocks providing continued headwinds. Some uncertainty about growing conditions ahead of the Northern Hemisphere Q2 planting season, however, provided some support. Arabica coffee hit a 14-year low as it continued to suffer from a weak Brazilian real and high Brazil output.
The uncertainty related to the outlook for agricultural commodities helped drive a record hedge fund short across key agriculture commodities. This development combined with a potential change in the fundamental and/or technical outlook could provide the sector with the tailwind to make up for lost ground into the second quarter.
The chart below shows the net position held by hedge funds across key commodity futures:
During the past week, gold showed renewed signs of investor apathy as the price once again dropped back below $1,300/oz. The lack of a bullish tailwind following the recent uber-dovish Federal Open Market Committee statement and the subsequent drop in bond yields is a concern. The circumstance highlights how gold needs support from all of its three main engines – lower stocks, bond yields, and USD – in order to attempt another run to the upside.
While falling bond yields and an 80% probability of a US rate cut before year-end are supportive, the other two engines – stocks and the dollar – have both been sputtering. Stable to higher stocks reduce the demand for alternative or safe-haven assets while the dollar has continued to recover from its post-FOMC sell-off. Growth concerns remain a key focus and one that could reduce the appeal for stocks if it deteriorates, as well as weakening the dollar and lending a hand to gold.
Underlying demand through exchange-traded products remains healthy with total holdings on the rise since early March. Hedge funds, meanwhile, continue to struggle and constantly have to adjust their leveraged exposure. The increase in bullish gold bets in the run-up to, and immediate aftermath of, the March 20 FOMC meeting and subsequent price drop has left them underwater with most of that position.
With the uptrend from early March broken, the risk of a deeper correction has once again emerged. The key level of support remains around $1275/oz, the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement and the January low.
While falling bond yields and an 80% probability of a US rate cut before year-end are supportive, the other two engines – stocks and the dollar – have both been sputtering. Stable to higher stocks reduce the demand for alternative or safe-haven assets while the dollar has continued to recover from its post-FOMC sell-off. Growth concerns remain a key focus and one that could reduce the appeal for stocks if it deteriorates, as well as weakening the dollar and lending a hand to gold.
Underlying demand through exchange-traded products remains healthy with total holdings on the rise since early March. Hedge funds, meanwhile, continue to struggle and constantly have to adjust their leveraged exposure. The increase in bullish gold bets in the run-up to, and immediate aftermath of, the March 20 FOMC meeting and subsequent price drop has left them underwater with most of that position.
With the uptrend from early March broken, the risk of a deeper correction has once again emerged. The key level of support remains around $1275/oz, the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement and the January low.
After rallying 93% since August, palladium once again managed to attract a great deal of attention as it headed for its biggest weekly decline in more than three years. The 17% top-to-bottom correction was another reminder that nothing ever goes in a straight line, no matter how strong the fundamental support might be. The strong rally and momentum had attracted a great deal of speculative investors and they will only look at the price behaviour and not underlying fundamentals.
Once $1,500/oz broke, the floodgate opened and the dismal liquidity in this metal became apparent. However, finding support ahead of $1,285/oz on the June futures tells us that this was nothing more than a weak correction within a strong uptrend, no matter how painful it seemed.
Once $1,500/oz broke, the floodgate opened and the dismal liquidity in this metal became apparent. However, finding support ahead of $1,285/oz on the June futures tells us that this was nothing more than a weak correction within a strong uptrend, no matter how painful it seemed.
WTI crude oil is heading for its best quarter in a decade, and spent the week trying to break above $60/barrel on route to $62/b, its 200-day moving average. President Trump tried again to send the price lower via Twitter when he once again asked Opec - this time politely - to provide some additional barrels. He justified his statement by citing fragile global markets; the market instead saw the request as a sign that the administration is preparing to tighten the screws on Iran when current waivers come up for renewal at the beginning of May.
Opec and Russia are for various reasons very unlikely to reverse the current course of keeping production tight. The Q4 collapse last year occurred after Opec, led by Saudi Arabia, ramped up production in the belief that Iranian exports would collapse. Instead they were wrong-footed by Trump’s waivers which helped trigger the December collapse.
With supply being cut, the biggest risk to oil is renewed worries about global growth and demand. This focus, however, will be kept down as long global stocks continue to rally like they did this past week on renewed trade deal and rate cut hopes.
Opec and Russia are for various reasons very unlikely to reverse the current course of keeping production tight. The Q4 collapse last year occurred after Opec, led by Saudi Arabia, ramped up production in the belief that Iranian exports would collapse. Instead they were wrong-footed by Trump’s waivers which helped trigger the December collapse.
With supply being cut, the biggest risk to oil is renewed worries about global growth and demand. This focus, however, will be kept down as long global stocks continue to rally like they did this past week on renewed trade deal and rate cut hopes.