Details Cookies
Important margin product information

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 75% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs, FX or any of our other products work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Cookie policy

This website uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience by enabling, optimising and analysing site operations, as well as to provide personalised ad content and allow you to connect to social media. By choosing “Accept all” you consent to the use of cookies and the related processing of personal data. Select “Manage consent” to manage your consent preferences. You can change your preferences or retract your consent at any time via the cookie policy page. Please view our cookie policy here and our privacy policy here


Tapering: what is it and why should you care

Althea Spinozzi

Senior Fixed Income Strategist

Summary:  In this article, we want to explain why tapering matters for your portfolio. In an accessible Q&A format, we outline what happened with tapering in the past what it could mean for markets today.

What does tapering mean?

When Federal Reserve's members talk about tapering, they refer to the gradual slow down of the pace of its large-scale asset purchases. Thus, it's talking about reducing the Fed's balance sheet's expansion pace,  also known as Quantitative Easing (QE).

The subsequent step to tapering is considering whether to reinvest maturing securities or to reduce its balance sheet. The central bank can decide whether to reduce its balance sheet gradually by letting maturing securities “runoff” without reinvesting or to sell assets actively.

What is Quantitative Easing (QE)?

QE refers to central banks' asset purchase programs created to stimulate the economy. It is a form of monetary policy used to increase the domestic supply of money and spur economic activity.

Central banks turn to quantitative easing when the short-term interest rate plunge to zero, but the economy still needs support. The idea behind QE is that it helps the economy by reducing interest rates and making corporate borrowing and mortgages cheaper. By buying government debt and Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS), the central bank reduces these instruments’ supply in the broader market. Investors who decide to hold these instruments need to raise their bids, pushing yields down.

In the wake of the Covid pandemic, the Federal Reserve cut short-term interest rates to zero in March 2020. Starting from July 2021, the Federal Reserve has been buying $80 billion of US Treasuries and $40 billion MBS to stimulate the economy to ensure a fast economic recovery.

Is QE different today compared to other times in history?

Currently, the Fed is purchasing Treasuries across a broad range of maturities to mitigate the shock provoked by the COVID-19 last year. However, QE before was involving long-term maturities. Therefore tapering could impact the yield curve differently.

Why is the Federal Reserve looking to reduce the pace of asset purchases?

The simple answer to this question is: because the economy doesn't need stimulus any longer. The US economy is estimated to grow an eye-popping 6% this year and 4% next year. At the same time, inflationary pressures and excessive risk-taking in markets accelerated significantly, making the termination of QE a natural outcome. However, Jerome Powell has recently highlighted that "substantial further progress" is needed to begin tapering. These remarks can be linked to the central bank's full employment target. The Fed is looking at the pre-COVID unemployment rate, roughly 3.5% and set it as a target. Although the central bank commits to full unemployment for a noble cause, the risk here is that the economy overheats, and its QE program continues to stimulate inflation.

What is a “taper tantrum”?

"Taper tantrum" refers to a particular episode that happened in 2013.

Following three rounds of QE to stimulate the economy after the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), Fed's Chair Ben Bernanke prepared the market for a decrease of purchases in May 2013. The following month, he revealed a tapering plan. Yields rose from 2.2% to 3% during summer despite Bernanke and other Fed members emphasising that any reduction would be gradual and not be related to any interest rate hikes. The sudden increase in US treasury yields caused capital outflows and currency depreciation in emerging markets like Brazil, India, Turkey and South Africa.

Regardless, the central banks began to taper in December that year, reducing the pace of asset purchases by $10 billion per month, starting from $85 billion. The asset purchase program ended in October 2014. The Federal Reserve, led by Janet Yellen, began shrinking its balance sheet a year later.

Can tapering in 2021 provoke another “taper tantrum”?

Compared to 2013, Jerome Powell has tried to decouple tapering talks with interest rate hikes this year. Indeed, he stated clearly said that tapering will precede any rate hike consideration.

Additionally, tapering doesn't mean that the Fed's balance sheet is going to shrink anytime soon. It will continue to grow (although at a slower pace) until tapering ends, thus providing stimulus to the economy. Under this point of view, tapering shouldn't be a big game-changer for the bond market.

Yet, tapering gives a signal surrounding the central bank's future policy intentions, impacting long-term interest rates. Expectations of less accommodative policies can spur a selloff in the long part of the yield curve before the Federal Reserve even begins to contemplate shrinking its balance sheet.

It's also important to highlight that tapering may be introduced in the last quarter of the year, where we might see the reflation trade come back to life as growth and inflation continue to be supported.

In conclusion, we might not run into a taper tantrum, such as it happened in 2013. Still, the rise in yield may be explained by economic fundamentals and accelerated by the Fed's monetary policy intentions.

Why reducing the Fed’s balance’s sheet size can be more problematic than tapering?

Because it increases the asset supply in markets while demand remains unchanged, it could provoke a rise in yields, thus tightening economic conditions.

Since the Global Financial crisis, the Federal Reserve decided to slowly wind down its balance sheet only once from October 2017 until September 2019. However, it didn’t end up well.

In mid-September 2019, money market rates spiked in a sign of distress due to the corporate tax date and increased US Treasury supply. The Federal Reserve had to announce an overnight repo operation to add reserves to the system. A month later, the Fed had to re-introduce QE purchasing Treasury bills at a pace of $60 billion per month. It continued to do so until the second quarter of 2020, when Covid happened. Then, the Fed had to step up its accommodative measures.
Source: Bloomberg and Saxo Group.


The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (
Full disclaimer (
Full disclaimer (

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15

Contact Saxo

Select region


Trade responsibly
All trading carries risk. Read more. To help you understand the risks involved we have put together a series of Key Information Documents (KIDs) highlighting the risks and rewards related to each product. Read more

This website can be accessed worldwide however the information on the website is related to Saxo Bank A/S and is not specific to any entity of Saxo Bank Group. All clients will directly engage with Saxo Bank A/S and all client agreements will be entered into with Saxo Bank A/S and thus governed by Danish Law.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc, registered in the US and other countries and regions. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.