Outrageous Predictions
Révolution Verte en Suisse : un projet de CHF 30 milliards d’ici 2050
Katrin Wagner
Head of Investment Content Switzerland
Head of Commodity Strategy
Friday’s historic collapse in silver was the result of several developments colliding simultaneously. While a correction had been increasingly anticipated—and was arguably overdue—the speed and depth of the sell-off proved a stark wake-up call. Once again, it underlined how one-sided positioning can cause outsized damage when it begins to unravel.
As usual, social media quickly filled with conspiracy theories suggesting the move was orchestrated to bail out underwater shorts. These narratives are best ignored. The more straightforward explanation is that silver’s multi-week rally—while supported by strong Chinese demand—had become increasingly driven by FOMO and speculative excess. When gold and silver turn into hot topics at dinner tables and in workplaces, it is often a sign that a particular phase of the rally is nearing exhaustion.
The speed of the preceding rally itself warranted caution. It took 42 days for silver to rise from USD 50 to 60, just 22 days to move from 60 to 80, and only 12 days from 80 to 110. Such a parabolic and increasingly unhinged advance almost inevitably set the stage for sharp and painful corrections, as exit doors become too narrow to absorb a sudden wave of forced selling.
Extreme trading volumes across futures, options, and ETFs, combined with increasingly strained market plumbing, amplified the move. Eventually, the system buckled.
On Thursday morning, I warned that the continued surge across metals—especially silver—had entered a dangerous phase. The core problem was volatility feeding on itself. As daily price swings expanded, liquidity thinned. Banks and market makers struggled to warehouse risk, particularly as their lifeline—the basis between physical and futures—became increasingly erratic. Once their willingness to quote prices in size faded, liquidity deteriorated further and volatility blew out.
The opening salvo came during Friday’s Asian session, following a turbulent European and US session on Thursday. Silver futures had earlier hit a record high at USD 121.78, before slumping by USD 15 into the close at USD 114.42. When Chinese markets opened, selling intensified—likely influenced by tighter margin requirements—with the SHFE silver futures contract ending the day down 17%.
Much attention has rightly focused on Monday’s surge in options volume in the iShares Silver ETF, the largest vehicle offering exposure to COMEX silver futures. A significant share of this activity consisted of naked call buying.
As calls were bought, option sellers were forced to hedge their exposure by buying silver futures. As prices continued higher and option deltas increased, this hedging demand grew—leaving the market increasingly short downside gamma. Once prices started to fall, the process went into reverse. The need to unwind delta hedges accelerated, creating a purely mechanical feedback loop where risk had to be reduced at whatever prices were available.
A further wave of selling hit later in the day, driven by position adjustments in the ProShares Ultra Silver ETF (AGQ), which provides 2x leveraged exposure to silver prices.
Strong demand through January had pushed assets under management to a record USD 5.3 billion by Thursday evening—equating to more than USD 10.6 billion of futures exposure. As a daily rebalancing product, the ETF provider was forced to adjust aggressively after Friday’s sell-off. With the fund already down around 20%, exposure had to be cut materially. This translated into an estimated USD 4 billion of silver futures selling during the rebalance window alone with more needed as the price .
There are several additional moving parts not covered above, not least the nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Fed Chair. The decision was first flagged by Polymarket late Thursday before being officially announced by President Trump in the early hours of Friday. Warsh is widely viewed as a policy hawk, a perception that helped drive renewed dollar strength and added to the risk aversion seen across equity markets and, in particular, the commodities complex.
Despite most of the forced deleveraging now likely having played out, both gold and silver saw additional weakness in early Monday trading. Silver briefly touched USD 71.38, marking a 41% slump from Thursday’s peak, while gold fell to around USD 4,402, a 21% decline, before both metals made tentative attempts at stabilisation. It was a brutal correction that left few participants unscathed, and whether a deeper setback is required to fully reset positioning remains to be seen.
The strategic case for holding precious metals as portfolio diversifiers has not suddenly disappeared, but one-sided positioning tends to end the same way: with large and unavoidable corrections. Within the complex, I continue to prefer gold, which despite the setback remains up around 4% year to date and approximately 58% over the past 12 months, underscoring its relatively greater depth and resilience during periods of stress.
In the coming days, attention will turn to China, a key driver of demand in recent months and a market where local prices have traded at a premium to London. The Shanghai silver futures market opened the latest session limit down, and trading will only resume once price action is deemed sufficient to attract fresh demand. If physical buying remains resilient, it should eventually provide an anchor for prices in Western markets.
However, with the Chinese New Year approaching and exchanges having already tightened trading conditions, near-term risk appetite may remain constrained. Against that backdrop, patience appears warranted, and chasing the market before a clearer picture emerges is unlikely to be the most prudent strategy.
| More from the author |
|---|
|