Macro Dragon Reflections: Checking back in on the MEME / WSB / Reddit Army stocks of GME, BB, BYND & AMC's +2850% Lift-Off!

Equities 8 minutes to read
Kay Van-Petersen

Global Macro Strategist

Summary:  In the latest Macro Dragon Reflections think piece, KVP checks back in on the Monday dive into the MEME, WSB, Reddit Army stocks. We now have AMC taking the GME throne with BB looking interesting, GME still in the running & BYND showing no signs of elevated volatility in its options. Still two days to go before the wk is out & already this wk AMC $62.55 is +139%, BB $15.25 +51%, GME $282.24 +27% & BYND $149.74 +3%.


(These are solely the views & opinions of KVP, & do not constitute any trade or investment recommendations. By the time you synthesize this, things may have changed.)

Macro Dragon Reflections: Checking back in on the MEME / WSB / Reddit Army stocks of GME, BB, BYND & AMC's +2850% Lift-Off!

 

Reflections…

  • So on Monday’s memorial day, we dropped a deep Dragon Reflections piece titled: Is Beyond Meat the next GameStop? Thoughts on the Jan-Feb Short Squeeze.... THE HIVE, AMC, GME, BB & BYND...
  • And highlighted that the Tue open & wk ahead could be very interesting for some of these names… & so far this has held true…

    • …this thought piece serves as a bit of a check in on the price action & developments so far over the Tues + Weds trading sessions… still two more trading days left this wk!
    • Underlying point here, is, hate it or love it… THE HIVE is here to stay… Jan/Feb were not a one-off occurrence but a sounding bell of the decentralized players being able to co-ordinate their views… similar to how the centralized Wallstreet players & hedge funds gals & guys have been doing for decades… that’s a paradigm shift.


    Yellow highlighted columns capture price & implied volatility increases so far this wk from Fri 28 May Close 
    MD - Thu 3 Jun

A few takeaways (So far at least)

  • AMC Ent. [AMC] $62.55 is clearly at the head of the pack, post a +116% price move last wk, the name has picked up another +139% over the first two trading day this wk. Taking its market cap from c. $13B to $31B, eclipsing GME. AMC also had the 2nd largest increase in IV (implied volatility) of +55%.
  • With AMC’s IV at 448, its got a potential +2.3x if we were to see a repeat to the 1017 highs in early Feb. With that said, +2850% YTD is just an insane number. If you had $50,000 in AMC before the start of the year, that would now be worth $1,475,000… & that’s just the stock not the options.
  • Blackberry [BB] $15.25 had the best explosion on its IV, at +162% to 286, from its previous Fri 28 May figure of 109. We had also flagged this on Mon, as BB likely have the best risk/reward set-up from this simple anecdotal set. It also by far, had the most days to cover in regards to short interest at +7.7 days… vs. paradoxically enough AMC at the lowest with 1.6x
  • BB also had 2nd best price pop, getting +51% over the two trading days this wk, well above the +18% it clocked last wk. Feb vol got to 455, less than half the lvls of GME & AMC at the time. So potential to just reach recent vol Highs in Feb is c. 1.6x. (Worth noting BB, BYND & other names were the peripherals in the Jan/Feb squeeze with GME & AMC being really the focus of THE HIVE)
  • GameStop [GME] $282.24  still very much in the game, with +27% pop in prices so far this wk & vol lifting by +29% to 215, vs. its IV close of 167. Vol is still well south of the 999 lvls that were set in early Feb (c. +4.6x move if that was to be replicated / surpassed)
  • GME now has a mkt cap of +$21B, hard to believe this was a name in the sub billion dollar mkt cap. The name is up +1400% YTD & folks say crypto is volatile!
  • Beyond Meat [BYND] $149.74 jumped by +11% o/n, yet that’s post a -7% move on Mon, breaking its tally so far this wk to +3% - clearly underperforming the other names, by also being only up +20% YTD. In fact, its unclear how much of the pop o/n was linked to THE HIVE or to the hack on meat producer JBS.
    • And yes Cyber Security is a meta investment theme, KVP is not on top of the individual names – would love a primer – yet there is an ETF called Russia, wait North Korea… no wait… HACK. Seriously the etf is called HACK, has been around since last 2014 & currently has +$2.2B in assets  
  • BYND’s IV has ticked up a notch by +14%, which again is vastly lower than the other 3 names. KVP still thinks, if THE HIVE / Reddit Army / WSB Possee / Apes etc… were really significantly participating in a name like BYND or any other name… you’d see it in volatility exploding in the options…
  • …so far, its still only half-time in the Beyond Meat court…
  • Net-net… as risky & crazy as things are… the path of least resistance is still likely to the upside in the MEME names. Its also worth noting, intuitively one would expect that we should not see another Robinhood / broker freeze on any of these names given what occurred in Jan/Feb… or at the very least… the bar will be significantly higher… which means we could look to replicate, perhaps even pass some of the stratospheric heights made in early Feb. Before going to situations of -70% to -90% drops in volatility & pullbacks of -70% or more in the actual prices  
  • Charts below will give a context on price appreciation both in the first 3 months of the year & the most recent two months…

For the Jan / Feb squeeze (Based from 12 Jan ) GME was firmly in the driver’s seat….

2 MD - Thu 3 Jun


For the current squeeze (Based from May 10) AMC has overtaken & no one else is even close…

...making one wonder who is the contender going to be, GME again or BB, BYND or brand new name?

3 MD - Thu 3 Jun

 

How to Stick Your Head Into A Wood Chipper…

  • So folks likely would like to see how to potentially think about playing momentum squeeze / FOMO / HYPE scenarios like this… we’ll do Macro Dragon think piece around that. Yet lets cover what few folks fail to talk about, how to NOT lose your shirt, blow up your account… etc…
  • So we will start it with the problem formulation of: If one really want to maximize the probability of losses & taking outrageous risks on memes stocks, how would one go about doing so?
  • Selling naked call options (i.e. not owning the underly security) is one of the ultimate sins in trading & risk-management. The point being, there is potential infinite losses here.
  • Example: There is Wood Chipper company (ticker OUCH)  trading at $100 per share, that has a monopoly on all the Wood Chipping business – its CEO & Chairperson is a Furio Giunta. One sells 10,000 of the 1m ATM call options for $10 per call, netting $100,000.
  • Which for an account with $1,000,000 (basically 11yrs of pre-tax annual income of the average American) in capital looks amazing, i.e. going to make +10% a month, +120% a year… this trading game is ‘easy peasy’… move over Buffett… clear the way Soros… there is new Sherriff in town!

    Happy days, one just has to sit tight for 30days & one’s break-even is $110, i.e. stock can move up by +10% before one starts to lose money, everything else being equal. And if we get above our break-even lvls of $110,  one can just cover. Right?
  • In most cases, yes (assuming you are sticking with big liquid names)… but in this case…
  • …the day right after the calls are sold, OUCH gets a take-over bid for a +100% premium. Yet it re-rates to $250 because, new counter offers are also expected & this could be the mother of all take-over bidding wars …
  • …and your short call position is now 110 – 230 = -120 on just strike to spot, a +12x loss on the original premium you made of $100,000 from selling the stock… or a drag of -$1,200,000 (loss of -120%) on what was $1,000,000 of capital. But…
  • … the loss is actually going to be much higher, because volatility would have also exploded in the name as it re-rated from $100 to $250… & one is still not out!  

-

 

Start<>End = Gratitude + Integrity + Vision + Tenacity | Process > Outcome | Sizing > Position.

This is The Way

Namaste,

KVP

Disclaimer

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-mena/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)


Due to coronavirus controls, we are not able to meet with clients in our reception at present, unless by appointment in exceptional circumstances. We remain at your service on the phone and email details below. Thank you for your understanding.

Please expect very long waiting times on the line when calling us, we advise you to send us an email instead.

Contact Saxo

Select region

UAE
UAE

Trade responsibly
All trading carries risk. Read more. To help you understand the risks involved we have put together a series of Key Information Documents (KIDs) highlighting the risks and rewards related to each product. Read more

Saxo Bank A/S is licensed by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority and operates in the UAE under a representative office license issued by the Central bank of the UAE.

The content and material made available on this website and the linked sites are provided by Saxo Bank A/S. It is the sole responsibility of the recipient to ascertain the terms of and comply with any local laws or regulation to which they are subject.

The UAE Representative Office of Saxo Bank A/S markets the Saxo Bank A/S trading platform and the products offered by Saxo Bank A/S.