GettyImages-1173740462 4

AI’s factory floor: reading ASML and TSMC signals

Equities
Ruben Dalfovo
Ruben Dalfovo

Investment Strategist

Key takeaways

  • Forget the chatter—ASML and TSMC show real AI demand.
  • Orders and mix beat expectations; bottlenecks shift to packaging and power.
  • Focus on delivery cadence, not headlines.


From hype to hardware

AI is not a slogan. It is factories, suppliers, and power hookups turning plans into compute. This week’s updates from ASML and TSMC are your cleanest read on whether that machine is speeding up or stalling.

The takeaway: demand visibility improved, execution risks moved, and the market rewarded clarity. This week answered a basic question: is AI still ramping? Yes, say ASML and TSMC—but the hard part now is packaging chips and turning on the power.

What changed this week

ASML said orders were firm and its near-term guide intact, while noting a likely step-down in China next year. That matched the setup going in and eased a key worry: was the order book real or just hype? The answer landed closer to “real,” with bookings topping pre-print expectations and a steady tone into year-end.

TSMC delivered a record quarter and beat profit expectations, with the mix skewing to leading nodes used in AI and high-performance computing. That confirmed what pre-announced revenue already hinted: hyperscalers are still pulling capacity forward, and the foundry’s margins can support it.

How markets read it

Shares in both names rosed after the updates. The move was about expectations, not just results. Into ASML, the bar on orders had risen; but the company cleared it and lifted tool peers and the broader chip complex.

The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index also gained as investors extrapolated steadier supply into 2026. For TSMC, a clean beat with an AI-heavy mix validated the ramp and supported suppliers tied to advanced packaging and networking. In short: evidence of real backlog conversion trumped macro noise.

The risks

  • China exposure. ASML signaled a likely step-down next year. If other regions slow too, the offset shrinks and the tool cycle gets choppier.

  • Packaging slippage. Capacity has expanded, yet the constraint has not vanished. Any delay in next-gen packaging flows can push AI server deliveries right.

  • Power delays. Permitting, transformers, and fuel choices can stall data-centre go-lives. The workaround is on-site power, but that can raise costs and execution risk.

The story behind the tape

ASML’s print told investors customers are still locking slots for 2026–2027. That reduces tail risk around “air pockets” in tool demand and supports the installed-base service stream, which smooths the cycle. The caveat is geographic: a softer China next year must be offset by rest-of-world AI builds.

TSMC’s mix leaned into the nodes that power AI accelerators and custom silicon. That is the signal hyperscalers care about: do leading-edge layers arrive on time and at scale? A yes here pushes secondary suppliers—substrates, networking, optics—to the foreground.

Last year’s fear was lithography throughput. Lithography is no longer the constraint. The bottleneck is now advanced packaging and power. Packaging capacity improved but still sets the pace, especially for high-end AI parts. Power is the bigger swing factor: grid connections and on-site generation now decide when sites go live.

Cut through the noise: the investor playbook

Cadence, not promises. Watch deliveries, not adjectives. Tool shipments at ASML and packaging throughput at TSMC decide how many AI servers ship each quarter. A small slip in either can ripple across the stack. Expectation beats matter more than absolute levels.

Power readiness. Grid hookups, substations, and “bring-your-own-power” plans now set timelines. Utilities and hyperscalers are striking demand-response deals and building generation because the grid cannot expand fast enough. Follow power milestones: interconnection approvals, substation progress, and any on-site generation deals. Implementation pace will steer revenue conversion of order books.

Customer mix. Listen for which chip sizes TSMC says are selling and how fast it can package them. That shows where demand is real. Big cloud buyers are spreading orders across more suppliers. If custom chips ramp faster—or one cloud giant pauses—the mix shifts and supplier orders move. Watch TSMC’s updates on lead times and packaging capacity.

From narrative to numbers: the final test

The AI build is still moving from pitch decks to power plants. ASML’s steadier orders and TSMC’s clean beat reshaped what mattered this week: delivery cadence, packaging throughput, and power readiness. The drivers are clear—leading-edge mix and credible schedules.

The risks are just as clear—China softness for tools and project delays around packaging or grid access. Over the next few quarters, markets will trade execution over aspiration. Ship the tools, clear packaging, switch on the power—then AI turns from narrative to numbers.

 

 

This material is marketing content and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results.
The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options..

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Q4 Outlook for Investors: Diversify like it’s 2025 – don’t fall for déjà vu

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q4 Outlook for Investors: Diversify like it’s 2025 – don’t fall for déjà vu

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Q4 Outlook for Traders: The Fed is back in easing mode. Is this time different?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q4 Outlook for Traders: The Fed is back in easing mode. Is this time different?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    The Fed launched a new easing cycle in late Q3. Will this cycle now play out like 2000 or 2007?
  • Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    After the chaos of Q2, the quarter ahead should get a bit more clarity on how Trump 2.0 is impacting...
  • Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Upending the global order at blinding speed

    Quarterly Outlook

    Upending the global order at blinding speed

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ...
  • Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Quarterly Outlook

    Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

Content disclaimer

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.


Business Hills Park – Building 4,
4th Floor, office 401, Dubai Hills Estate, P.O. Box 33641, Dubai, UAE

Contact Saxo

Select region

UAE
UAE

All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.