Head of Macroeconomic Research
Summary: We believe we are at the early innings of an EMs rally that could materialize in early 2020, fueled by improved growth, less trade war frictions between the US and China and a weaker dollar.
Our central scenario: We expect that higher central bank liquidity combined with improving US and China credit impulses will reflect positively on economic growth in Q1-Q2 2020. On the top of that, we think that we are approaching the end of the strong dollar cycle and that idiosyncratic US political risk ahead of the 2020 election will push the USD lower. It could motivate investors to move away from a defensive portfolio and have a more positive bias towards EMs.
Trade war frictions remain the top main risk in the short-term
Our FX Risk indicator, based on the evolution of Asian Currencies (ex. Japan) vs the USD, was out in contraction at minus 1.3% Q/Q in Q3. The contraction is less important than during the previous episodes of trade war tensions, especially in 2018. However, it is a reminder that trade war remains one of the main risks for EMs in the short term.
We still think a mini trade deal between the United States and China could be reached in November, when the APEC summit will take place. This does not mean that trade tensions will disappear overnight, and that global trade will escape from recession. Indeed, the risk is elevated that the Trump administration will turn to Europe and has a more radical approach to force Europeans to make trade concessions. Nonetheless, such a mini deal could temporarily have a positive effect on confidence and growth momentum, and it could give a boost to emerging countries that are among the most dependent on manufacturing to growth, especially in Southeast Asia.
If a currency pact is also part of the mini deal, and that the CNY remains stable, as it has been for several months, it could also push the Dollar Index lower, which would be another reason to be positive on EMs.
The USD has likely reached its cyclical top
The rise of the USD since April 2018 has been one of the most important drivers of asset performance over the past 18 months and has played a key role in EMs performance along with trade war tensions. The stronger Dollar Index has resulted from risk aversion but, foremost, from lower US dollar liquidity in the international financial system.
We now see limited upside for DXY and consider we are approaching, or we already are, at the end of the strong dollar cycle. We identify four factors that should push the DXY lower in coming months: improving central bank liquidity, in relation to the new accommodative stance from global central banks, positive effect of US and Chinese credit push on growth, US-China trade truce and idiosyncratic US political risk due to the 2020 presidential election. On the top of that, we should not forget that the United States desperately need a lower USD, even more than usual as the election period is kicking off. If USD weakness is about to start, as we firmly believe, it could be a decisive driver for EMs rally into 2020.
EMs have started to accommodate the global slowdown
As I have recently said to Bloomberg, what is interesting contrary to previous periods of slowdown is that all EMs have room to make a monetary of fiscal push in order to stay afloat. No country is constrained on both policies and some of them, notably Russia and South Korea, can even accommodate on both. It should be supportive for EMs high quality debt in the medium term.
Aside from the example of these two countries that I discuss longer in the interview, we also have very positive trends emerging in two other emerging markets, especially regarding fiscal push:
Until the positive factors we have mentioned in this report are confirmed, we reiterate the need for selectivity and see more upside potential in Asia than in Latin America, where the path of reforms is slowing down sharply and where social unrest questions the ability of elected members to implement a reformist agenda.
A new fragmented world order can render some of today's infrastructure obselete, but it also calls for massive new investments across the globe, which requires a new set of strategic and tactical investment strategies.
Steen Jakobsen,
Chief Investment Officer
As globalisation turns to fragmentation, China seems set on playing a role in the global economy, while simultaneously working towards proofing its own economic situation from external shocks and crises.
Redmond Wong,
Market Strategist
The recent bank runs and ensuing challenges are reminicent of something we've seen before. Will it end like the S&L crises of 1986 and 1995?
Chris Dembik,
Head of Macroeconomic Research
Equity markets need to recalibrate to another - fragmented - global world. What's your view on equities in this market - are they going up or down?
Peter Garnry,
Head of Equity Strategy
With every development comes new opportunites, some of which could be in India. Have you considered the country as a part of your diversification strategy?
Charu Chanana,
Market Strategist
A collar is an option strategy that allows some protection while maintaining some upside potential. What investment would you like to use a collar strategy for?
Hans Oudshoorn,
Trainer Academy
There are arguments to be made for many commodities to have upside. Which are you paying the most attention to this quarter?
Ole S. Hansen,
Head of Commodity Strategy
In a very challenging macro environment, which currencies do you think will come out on top?
John J. Hardy,
Head of FX Strategy
Disclaimer
The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.
Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-gb/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)
