Quarterly Outlook
Upending the global order at blinding speed
John J. Hardy
Global Head of Macro Strategy
Chief Investment Strategist
Note: This content is marketing material.
As US-China trade talks in London extend into a second day, investors are looking for direction amid a swirl of competing headlines—continued tariff threats, the Trump-Musk breakup, and civil unrest in LA. Risks are broadening across multiple fronts, but markets are holding firm.
Why? Because the underlying economic picture remains solid. This macro resilience is giving the current administration room to maintain a tough negotiating stance, while also allowing investors to stay focused on fundamentals rather than short-term noise.
President Trump continues to employ disruption as a strategy—on trade, technology, and corporate influence. While that has injected volatility at times, it’s part of a broader approach aimed at securing leverage and outcomes.
What we’re seeing now isn’t necessarily a loss of control—it’s risk dispersion across multiple dimensions:
This doesn’t point to a single narrative—it creates both upside and downside risks, depending on how events unfold.
Optimism lingers as US-China talks continue, but the era of easy wins—tariff pauses and minor concessions—is over. What’s left are deeper, more entrenched challenges: tech restrictions, rare earth supply chains, student visas, and national security-linked concerns. These are strategic disputes, unlikely to be resolved in a few rounds of meetings.
That said, trade uncertainty has clearly faded since the peak chaos of early April. Markets have become more selective, and trade no longer dominates price action the way it once did.
Friday’s jobs report underscored the Fed’s flexibility. Growth remains steady, the labor market is holding, and inflation is easing—giving policymakers space to remain on hold and watch for the impact of tariffs. Markets largely dismissed Trump’s renewed calls for a 100bp rate cut, with expectations now leaning toward less than two 25bp cut by year-end.
More intriguing have been Trump’s remarks that he already has a name in mind to replace Chair Powell in May—and that an announcement may come “very soon.” That raises the possibility of a ‘shadow Chair’ dynamic, where Trump’s chosen successor begins shaping market expectations before officially taking over.
This scenario would likely challenge the traditional framework of Fed independence. If the new pick actively signals future policy preferences, markets may begin to look past Powell before his term is done.
For now, markets are staying focused on what matters most:
That combination is enough to keep risk appetite intact and volatility subdued. The headlines haven’t disappeared—but their market-moving power is fading. As long as the fundamental backdrop holds, investors are choosing to look through the noise.