Duration is more toxic than credit quality, junk bond say Duration is more toxic than credit quality, junk bond say Duration is more toxic than credit quality, junk bond say

Duration is more toxic than credit quality, junk bond say

Bonds
strats-Althea-88x88
Althea Spinozzi

Senior Fixed Income Strategist

Summary:  The recent widening in credit spreads indicates that duration is a bigger villain than credit quality. Although year-to-date junk bond spreads widened faster than high-grade spreads, junk recorded half of the losses than investment-grade bonds in terms of total return. In 2022, reducing duration to a minimum will be critical while securing an adequate yield amid a rising interest rate environment. Junk bonds remain the only fixed-income assets to provide a solution to the problem. Yet, investors should pay attention to financing conditions, as a sudden rise in real rates could finally provoke a selloff within weaker corporate bonds.


Investors begin to worry that the recent volatility in rates will cause trouble within the junk bond space. Year to date, junk funds have suffered the worst exodus since January last year, while high-grade fund flows were up in a sign that investors are looking for quality as yields rise.

However, fund flows are not providing the whole picture.

13_01_2022_AS1
Source: Bloomberg and Saxo Group.

According to Bloomberg Barclays indexes, corporate junk bond OAS widened during the first week of the year by 17bps amid a sudden rise in Treasury yields. At the same time, investment-grade corporate spreads widened only 1.37bps. Yet, junk is down only 1.15% year-to-date, while high-grade corporates dropped by 2% in terms of total return. As volatility in the Treasury market stabilizes, we see corporate spreads recover their losses. Today, junk records a loss of -0.6% since the beginning of the year, while quality is still registering a loss of -1.9%.

The conclusion that bond investors can draw from this is clear. Duration will be 2022 big villain, while credit quality will continue to be overlooked as long as negative real yields provide favorable financing conditions.

This point gets more explicit when we compare total junk return by rating. Better-rated junk (BB) dropped faster than lower-rated junk (CCC) because it contains more duration than the latter. Not only, but the bid for higher-yielding corporates, regardless of credit quality, remains strong. Indeed, there is no other instrument in the bond market that can offer a high enough yield to create a buffer against high inflation and rising interest rates. On top of that, helicopter money in 2020 and 2021 improved credit quality within weaker companies, leading S&P and Moody’s to give much more rating upgrades than downgrades last year than ever in the past ten years. 

13_01_2022_AS2

Like the stock markets, bond investors embrace the TINA (There Is No Alternative) mantra and buy junk, confident that at the first hiccup, the Federal Reserve will step in to rescue the day.

This strategy might work for some time, but it cannot last long. Since the beginning of the year, real rates rose exponentially, with 10-year TIPS going from -1.1% to -0.7% in just eight days. Rising real rates threaten weaker companies because they indicate a sudden tightening of financing conditions. Therefore, they could spell an upcoming increase of downgrades or even defaults in the junk bond space.

It is not improbable since the Federal Reserve is now looking to steepen the yield curve by running off its balance sheet. It's a desperate step that the FED needs to take to avoid an inversion of the yield curve.

What can tell me things are about to go south?

As the Fed prepares to tighten the economy as soon as March, it’s key to understand what could ring the alarming bells before a complete meltdown.

  1. Real yields. Watch real yields rise. Once they break above -0.5%, we are entering a danger zone all the way to 0%
13_01_2022_AS3
Source: Bloomberg and Saxo Group.

2. HY-IG spread. The spread between junk and investment grade remains within the lowest level since 2007 despite the recent widening in HY spreads. Once it starts to rise above 250bps, it will be time to reconsider risk within your junk positions, as it will be indicating that either (1) credit quality is deteriorating (2) market sentiment is changing, which could send the market into a "taper tantrum" kind of selloff.

13_01_2022_AS4
Source: Bloomberg and Saxo Group.
Overall, there is no reason to panic right now. Financial conditions remain favorable, and junk continues to be supported. Investors' worst enemy remains duration. Yet, it's essential to consider how monetary policy tightening could change the environment and undermine vulnerable positions.

Disclaimer

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)
Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/legal/saxoselect-disclaimer/disclaimer)

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15
2900
Hellerup
Denmark

Contact Saxo

Select region

International
International

Trade responsibly
All trading carries risk. Read more. To help you understand the risks involved we have put together a series of Key Information Documents (KIDs) highlighting the risks and rewards related to each product. Read more

This website can be accessed worldwide however the information on the website is related to Saxo Bank A/S and is not specific to any entity of Saxo Bank Group. All clients will directly engage with Saxo Bank A/S and all client agreements will be entered into with Saxo Bank A/S and thus governed by Danish Law.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc, registered in the US and other countries and regions. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.