No, a greater Ethereum staking ratio is not strictly great No, a greater Ethereum staking ratio is not strictly great No, a greater Ethereum staking ratio is not strictly great

No, a greater Ethereum staking ratio is not strictly great

Mads Eberhardt

Cryptocurrency Analyst

Summary:  The Ethereum community largely shares a positive outlook on the fact that more Ether is staked, as it implies that more Ether cannot be sold in the near term. However, we do not share that view. Instead, we argue that a lower staking ratio maintains solid fundamentals, including limiting the issuance of Ether and retaining high staking rewards. Too, it signifies that Ether is much more than merely staking. As a consequence, Ethereum should not fight for more but less staking.


On the 1st of December 2020, the staking contract of Ethereum launched, offering holders to stake Ether, in plain English, verify transactions on the Ethereum network by locking up their Ether. For nearly 2.5 years, the staking contract was a one-way street, making stakers unable to unstake. However, on April 12, 2023, staking on Ethereum turned into a two-way street on account of the Shanghai hard fork, at long last providing stakers with the option to unstake.

Still, in the time past the Shanghai hard fork, considerably more Ether has been staked than unstaked. To be exact, a net total of slightly more than 25,300 validators have joined the staking contract. Each validator represents 32 Ether, by which about 809,600 more Ether has been staked following the Shanghai hard fork. This implies that 18.78mn Ether is presently staked, amounting to around 15.6% of the total supply of nearly 120.26mn Ether. Also, about 72,500 validators are in the activation queue waiting to enter the staking contract, expected to be fully enrolled within the next around 40 days.

Although the activation queue to stake is somewhat comprehensive, it is nowhere near setting the staking ratio of Ethereum side-by-side with other proof-of-stake cryptocurrencies. Take Solana and Avalanche. They have staking ratios of 71.5% and 60%, respectively, whereas Ethereum is set to have a staking ratio equal to 17.55% once the present activation queue has been cleared given that no unstake.

After all, over the next two years, we expect staked Ether to approach 35mn to 40mn, after which we anticipate that it slowly nears 45mn. However, we view a staking ratio above 50%, meaning at least 60mn staked Ether, as highly unlikely. Although other cryptocurrencies present a staking ratio much higher than this level, Ethereum has characteristics that largely discourage substantial staking. This involves a lower staking reward, the requirement of 32 Ether for a single validator, queues to stake and unstake, negative supply growth following the merge, so non-stakers do not feel forced to stake upon otherwise inherent constant dilution, and a second-to-none ecosystem of applications to elsewhere employ Ether if not staked.

A higher staking ratio causes greater issuance and lower staking rewards

The staking ratio of Ethereum attracts attention mainly thanks to two factors, both of which largely impact the future fundamentals of the cryptocurrency. The Ethereum network responds to additional validators by increasing the overall issuance of Ether rewarded to stakers, however, this is not realized linearly, causing individual staking rewards to decline. For example, by the present 18.7mn staked Ether, the network issues about 720,000 Ether yearly rewarding stakers with an issuance reward of 3.8%. In contrast, provided that the amount of Ether staked more than doubles to the upper end of our near-term estimate of 40mn Ether, Ethereum would then issue 1.06mn Ether at an issuance reward of 2.6%. This triggers over 300,000 extra Ether to be issued yearly at a total present cost of over $550mn, sooner rather than later for the market to absorb, whereas stakers are to be rewarded with over one percent less in issuance rewards.

In fact, one should not merely consider the issuance reward, as the overall staking reward consists of an issuance reward, transaction tips, and maximal extractable value (MEV). The latter two are related to the reward of proposing a block. In case the number of validators doubles, any given validator is half as likely to propose a block, ultimately reducing both tips and MEV rewards by half. These two types of rewards together paid roughly 2.6% in annualized rewards since the Ethereum merge on the 15th of September 2022. Altogether, given that staked Ether increases to 40mn, the staking reward is reduced by up to 2.5 percentage points yearly from 6.3% to around 3.8% for all stakers.

A greater Ethereum staking ratio is not strictly great

This indicates that both non-stakers and stakers are worse off by a greater staking ratio. Both parties get diluted relatively more by the greater issuance. To make matters worse, stakers simultaneously receive substantially less in staking rewards.

Indeed, in this case, relatively more Ether has shifted from non-staked to staked, suddenly receiving a staking reward compared to nothing previously. Based on this factor, one may argue that it is just a zero-sum game, in that the increased issuance and reduced staking reward are transferred to the newly staked Ether, but it yet deteriorates the fundamentals of Ethereum the more the market deems it necessary to stake Ether. Such a shift also signifies that there are limited other applications and use cases wherein to utilize Ether rather than stake them, overall reducing the value of the Ethereum network. So, the community should in fact call for less staking rather than more, although it means that less Ether is locked in the staking contract short-term. In the best case, less staking is accomplished by expanding the ecosystem, so there are more on-chain alternatives to staking.

All things being equal, it would be another case given that the Ethereum network benefited widely from additional validators with respect to scalability, decentralization, or security, but that is not true. To set the record straight, regarding scalability, the transactional output remains the same no matter the number of validators. Next, the network does not by default become more decentralized provided that more Ether is staked, as it is rather the staking distribution among holders, exchanges, liquid staking providers, and other intermediaries that is vital in this context. Lastly, the Ethereum proof-of-stake mechanism is so resistant to outside attacks that it barely achieves a higher degree of security beyond a certain staking threshold that was arguably reached a long time ago.

Source: Saxo Group

Disclaimer

The Saxo Group entities each provide execution-only service, and access to analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Inspiration Disclaimer and (v) Notices applying to Trade Inspiration, Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular, no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-sg/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)

None of the information contained here constitutes an offer to purchase or sell a financial instrument, or to make any investments. Saxo Markets does not take into account your personal investment objectives or financial situation and makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the information nor for any loss arising from any investment made in reliance of this presentation. Any opinions made are subject to change and may be personal to the author. These may not necessarily reflect the opinion of Saxo Markets or its affiliates.

Saxo Markets
88 Market Street
CapitaSpring #31-01
Singapore 048948

Contact Saxo

Select region

Singapore
Singapore

Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd ('Saxo Markets') is a company authorised and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) [Co. Reg. No.: 200601141M ] and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Saxo Bank A/S, headquartered in Denmark. Please refer to our General Business Terms & Risk Warning to consider whether acquiring or continuing to hold financial products is suitable for you, prior to opening an account and investing in a financial product.

Trading in financial instruments carries various risks, and is not suitable for all investors. Please seek expert advice, and always ensure that you fully understand these risks before trading. Trading in leveraged products such as Margin FX products may result in your losses exceeding your initial deposits. Saxo Markets does not provide financial advice, any information available on this website is ‘general’ in nature and for informational purposes only. Saxo Markets does not take into account an individual’s needs, objectives or financial situation.

The Saxo trading platform has received numerous awards and recognition. For details of these awards and information on awards visit www.home.saxo/en-sg/about-us/awards.

The information or the products and services referred to on this website may be accessed worldwide, however is only intended for distribution to and use by recipients located in countries where such use does not constitute a violation of applicable legislation or regulations. Products and Services offered on this website are not intended for residents of the United States, Malaysia and Japan. Please click here to view our full disclaimer.

This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc, registered in the US and other countries and regions. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.