Commodity Weekly: Crude oil frets geopolitics, sluggish demand bounce Commodity Weekly: Crude oil frets geopolitics, sluggish demand bounce Commodity Weekly: Crude oil frets geopolitics, sluggish demand bounce

Commodity Weekly: Crude oil frets geopolitics, sluggish demand bounce

Ole Hansen

Head of Commodity Strategy

Summary:  Commodities trading was mixed during the final week of May. A month that turned out to be the come-back month for many markets following the Covid-19 related collapse seen during Q1. The energy sector gave back some of their record monthly gains, industrial metals paused while precious metals rose on increased geopolitical concerns, a weaker dollar and lower bond yields.


Commodities trading was mixed during the final week of May. A month that turned out to be the come-back month for many markets following the Covid-19 related collapse seen during Q1. The continued easing of lockdowns around the world have, despite dismal economic data, raised hopes that a V-shaped recovery may occur over the coming months. This is optimism we unfortunately do not share - with millions of workers unlikely to return to work, together with the risk of the virus re-emerging as some economies attempt to open-up too soon.

The Bloomberg Commodity Index traded lower, with the energy sector giving back some of their record gains seen after the April collapse. Industrial metals also traded softer on rising US-China tensions despite the National People’s Congress introducing new stimulus measures. A challenge to precious metals was quickly reversed with both gold and not least silver continuing to attract demand amid a weaker dollar, lower real yields and friction between the world’s two biggest economies. 

While silver continued to claw back some of its substantial March losses, gold’s resilience was tested once again this past week. The lack of follow-through momentum from the recent breakout to $1765 had left the market nervous and it culminated when the spot price briefly broke below $1700/oz this past week. However, just like the break to the upside failed to attract fresh buying, the break below support was not met by fresh selling. 

Instead, support was quickly reestablished as the dollar and bond yields moved lower on increased US-China tensions. Investors continue to view the yellow metal, and recently also silver, as the go-to metals for protection. While hedge funds, which often trade on the back of a short-term technical price developments, have been rather quiet in recent months, the demand for ETF’s backed by bullion has continued to go from strength to strength. Global holdings in gold-backed ETF’s have risen non-stop for the past six months with assets at a record level above 3,100 tons.

The same goes for silver which, despite its March slump, has seen total holdings rise strongly to reach fresh records on an almost daily basis during the past couple of months. Having rallied by 50% since that March low at $11.65/oz, the metal has also managed to claw back some ground against gold. The gold-silver ratio, which expresses the value of one ounce of gold in ounces of silver, has recovered from the record 125 level reached in March to the current 98, still well above the five-year average close to 80. 

We maintain our bullish outlook for both metals, not least gold now that its premium to silver has narrowed. The main reasons why we cannot rule out reaching a fresh record high over the coming years are:

  • Gold acts as a hedge against Central Bank monetization of the financial markets
  • Unprecedented government stimulus and political need for higher inflation to support debt levels
  • The inevitable introduction of yield controls in the US forcing real yields lower
  • A rising global savings glut at a time of negative real interest rates and unsustainably high stock market valuation
  • Raised geo-political tensions as the Covid-19 blame game begins
  • Rising inflation and a weaker US dollar

The crude oil rally that emerged following the sub-zero collapse on April 20 is showing the first signs of pausing. This after the WTI futures contract hit $35 resistance and Brent failed to challenge $37.2/b, both levels being the 38.2% retracement of the January to April sell-off. The brief collapse into negative territory last month on the expiring May WTI contract probably was the single biggest contributor to support the strong rally that followed.

The event on April 20 sent a shockwave through the global oil market with producers realizing that something dramatic had to be done in order to rescue the market from even more pain. This probably led to the very strong and rapid compliance that major producers have been exhibiting during May.

In their latest monthly Oil Market Report the International Energy Agency saw global supply drop by 12 million barrels/day in May to reach a nine-year low at 88 million. Demand meanwhile was expected to recover from being down 22 million barrels/day year-on-year in May to down 13 million in June.

Supporting the process has been the rapid and in most cases involuntary reduction in US shale oil production, now estimated by the IEA to reach 2.8 million barrels/day year-on-year in 2020. Previous production cuts by OPEC+ always attracted some level of hesitancy as members of the group risked yielding further market share to producers in North America. That risk evaporated with the slump in WTI as it left many producers out of pocket, thereby forcing them to halt production.

Having potentially reached the consolidation phase, it is worth considering what could trigger renewed weakness. There are several risks with the most relevant being:

  • Easing lockdowns sparking a resurgence of Covid-19 outbreaks
  • Whether OPEC+ can maintain the current high level of compliance
  • Cash strapped US producers desperate to increase production with WTI back above $30/b
  • Post-pandemic changes in global consumer habits (less flying and more working from home)

A break above $35/b on the July WTI futures contract could signal a potential extension towards $40/b while support should emerge at $30/b. Only a break below $28/b would raise concerns of a deeper correction.

Apart from the risk of a new trade war between the US and China, as well as a weaker-than-expected demand recovery, the oil market focus in early June will once again turn to Vienna where OPEC and the OPEC+ group convene to discuss a path forward. Some concerns that Russia may struggle to commit to current cuts beyond July may once again create some nervousness prior to the June 8 to 10 meetings. This on the grounds that the recovery in crude oil prices so far has primarily been driven by supply cuts, that can easily be reversed, and not yet a solid recovery in demand.

Source: Saxo Bank

HG Copper increasingly, just like crude oil, looks like it needs a period of consolidation. Having almost retraced most of its Covid-19 related sell-off in March, the metal is likely to struggle in its attempt to break back above $2.50/lb, a level which provided support but now resistance, since 2017. The National People’s Congress in China, which has just finished,  offered fresh stimulus measures that will increase demand for raw materials in key sectors such as construction and transport. Overall, however, it was not the fiscal bazooka the market has seen during previous downturns. While perhaps stabilizing the outlook it is unlikely to drive a recovery in growth back to the 6% level. For now, traders are holding onto the prospects for a global economic rebound outweighing increased tensions between the US and China. 

Corn, a recent favorite short-sell among hedge funds, was heading for its biggest weekly gain since last October. The recent recovery in crude oil has led to increased demand from ethanol producers who normally consumer close to 40% of the US corn production. Together with the potential short-term threat of hot and dry weather across the US Midwest, the price has moved higher and it now looks like a floor has been established at the key $3/bushel level. Speculators held a net-short of 245,000 lots (31 million tons) in the week to May 19 and continued short-covering could see the contract challenge an area of resistance above $3.40/bushel. Wheat is also finding a weather-related bid while soybeans remain troubled by US-China tensions hurting the prospect for Chinese demand.

Coffee’s Covid-19 related rollercoaster has gone full circle. After rallying by 25% during March on worries supply from South America would be disrupted the price has since collapse once again. The prolonged shutdowns around the world have since  reduced demand for quality beans from coffee shops and cafés.  This week the price broke support and dropped back below $1/lb and well below the current cost of production for many farmers across South America. Something that may get addressed when the International Coffee Organization hold a virtual meeting of its International Coffee Council from June 1.

Disclaimer

The Saxo Group entities each provide execution-only service, and access to analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Inspiration Disclaimer and (v) Notices applying to Trade Inspiration, Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular, no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-sg/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)

None of the information contained here constitutes an offer to purchase or sell a financial instrument, or to make any investments. Saxo Markets does not take into account your personal investment objectives or financial situation and makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the information nor for any loss arising from any investment made in reliance of this presentation. Any opinions made are subject to change and may be personal to the author. These may not necessarily reflect the opinion of Saxo Markets or its affiliates.

Saxo Markets
88 Market Street
CapitaSpring #31-01
Singapore 048948

Contact Saxo

Select region

Singapore
Singapore

Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd ('Saxo Markets') is a company authorised and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) [Co. Reg. No.: 200601141M ] and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Saxo Bank A/S, headquartered in Denmark. Please refer to our General Business Terms & Risk Warning to consider whether acquiring or continuing to hold financial products is suitable for you, prior to opening an account and investing in a financial product.

Trading in financial instruments carries various risks, and is not suitable for all investors. Please seek expert advice, and always ensure that you fully understand these risks before trading. Trading in leveraged products such as Margin FX products may result in your losses exceeding your initial deposits. Saxo Markets does not provide financial advice, any information available on this website is ‘general’ in nature and for informational purposes only. Saxo Markets does not take into account an individual’s needs, objectives or financial situation.

The Saxo trading platform has received numerous awards and recognition. For details of these awards and information on awards visit www.home.saxo/en-sg/about-us/awards.

The information or the products and services referred to on this website may be accessed worldwide, however is only intended for distribution to and use by recipients located in countries where such use does not constitute a violation of applicable legislation or regulations. Products and Services offered on this website are not intended for residents of the United States, Malaysia and Japan. Please click here to view our full disclaimer.

This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc, registered in the US and other countries and regions. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.