Evergrande, and why it is important for the Chinese bond market

Evergrande, and why it is important for the Chinese bond market

Bonds
Althea Spinozzi

Senior Fixed Income Strategist

Summary:  With Beijing reluctant to intervene with a bailout, the best-case scenario for Evergrande's bond investors is a restructuring of its debt. A liquidation could also be an option, but it would be a much longer process. A default of Evergrande poses a severe threat to the Chinese real estate market and smaller banks. However, we expect it to be limited to the Chinese market.


What is Evergrande, and why is it important?

Evergrande is China's second-largest property developer, which quickly turned from “the world’s most valuable real estate company” in 2018 to the “world’s most indebted company” recently.

To fuel growth amid the Chinese real estate rally, the company leveraged hefty amounts of credit. Little it knew it would have faced the Covid-19 pandemic and a long-term slowdown in the Chinese property market, provoking a fast deterioration of the company's fundamentals. This year, a debt squeeze led to suppliers' payment delinquencies, putting the company at risk of default.

The Chinese market faces the problem that Evergrande is a bellwether for the real estate sector with over a thousand projects across the country and total liabilities of over $300 billion. A default poses funding problems to Chinese real estate corporates and the Chinese banking sector, which inevitably increased exposure to the real estate giant during the past decade.

As Citigroup indicated, Chinese developers will have problems refinancing debt in the onshore market because of low demand. Refinancing in the offshore market would also be unviable due to the recent spike of funding costs for Chinese high yield corporates in USD. According to Bloomberg Barclays Indexes, yields rose from roughly 8% in May to 13.70%, the highest since March 2020 as the Covid-19 pandemic was hitting the market.

The property market will undoubtedly go through a period of adjustments as the collapse of Evergrande could suppress property values. Yet, we do not expect the government to tolerate a full-blown out collapse as more than three-quarters of household wealth in China is tight up in the property market.

Banks are also vulnerable amid an Evergrande's default. They would see their balance sheets deteriorate amid an increase in non-performing loans.

Source: Bloomberg

What should I know above Evergrande bonds?

Evergrande onshore bonds' trading has been suspended for a day, promising that it will resume tomorrow. The press release explained that the trading suspension serves to inform all investors about the company downgrade to A from AA, which for China Chengxin International is the lowest investment-grade rating. When a company is rated below AA, bonds must be traded via bid-ask and block platform rather than auction. It’s a move that prevents small investors from making speculative investments. Some expect the bonds not to resume trading at all and to be equitized. That explained the 8% plunge in the stocks, taking the securities to a fast track to 0.

Things are different for offshore bonds in the US dollar, which trade around thirty cents on the dollar. The first bond to mature is the Evergrande 8.25% March 2022 (XS1580431143). Although the company doesn’t have bonds maturing this year, the company was scheduled to make interest payments next week of $83.5 million for a dollar note and $36 million for a local note. Hopes for payment have now faded as Chinese authorities have told lenders not to expect interest payments next week.

At this point, there are two scenarios for bond investors:

  • 1-Restructuring. That would be the best option for investors, although analysts expect the US dollar debt to take a haircut of roughly 70%.
  • 2-Liquidation. This would be a total nightmare. It would take a long time to liquidate all assets, and equity investors would probably not receive anything.

What can we expect from Chinese authorities?

What we do not have to expect is for the Chinese government to bailout the company. During the past year, Beijing allowed several state-owned enterprises to default, showing a change of mentality about defaults. In the past, it was assumed that the government would step with a bailout if a state-owned enterprise defaulted. This year the government showed that it steps in only if contagion risk is identified, such as the one we have witnessed to this year with Huarong Asset Management. Huarong's default had the potential to shake up all the economy; that's why an agreement was arranged with Critic Group and other state-owned investors to inject $7.7 billion into the company.

In the case of Evergrande, it doesn't look like the government is willing to intervene. Firstly, Beijing wants to ensure sustainable growth within the real estate industry, eliminating overleveraged companies. Secondly, a bailout for $300bn would only transfer the debt from Evergrande to the government, producing volatility in the Chinese government bond market. The government can try to make the default as painless as it can by encouraging debt extensions and pushing credit committees, but a bailout doesn't look likely.
Disclaimer

The Saxo Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-sg/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)

None of the information contained here constitutes an offer to purchase or sell a financial instrument, or to make any investments. Saxo Markets does not take into account your personal investment objectives or financial situation and makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the information nor for any loss arising from any investment made in reliance of this presentation. Any opinions made are subject to change and may be personal to the author. These may not necessarily reflect the opinion of Saxo Capital Markets or its affiliates.

Saxo Markets
Most of our staff in Singapore are working from home to help limit the spread of the coronavirus. We remain at your service on the details below. Thank you for your understanding.

Contact Saxo

Select region

Singapore
Singapore

Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd ('Saxo Markets') is a company authorised and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) [Co. Reg. No.: 200601141M ] and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Saxo Bank A/S, headquartered in Denmark. Please refer to our General Business Terms & Risk Warning to consider whether acquiring or continuing to hold financial products is suitable for you, prior to opening an account and investing in a financial product.

Trading in financial instruments carries various risks, and is not suitable for all investors. Please seek expert advice, and always ensure that you fully understand these risks before trading. Trading in leveraged products such as Margin FX products may result in your losses exceeding your initial deposits. Saxo Markets does not provide financial advice, any information available on this website is ‘general’ in nature and for informational purposes only. Saxo Markets does not take into account an individual’s needs, objectives or financial situation.

The Saxo trading platform has received numerous awards and recognition. For details of these awards and information on awards visit www.home.saxo/en-sg/about-us/awards.

The information or the products and services referred to on this website may be accessed worldwide, however is only intended for distribution to and use by recipients located in countries where such use does not constitute a violation of applicable legislation or regulations. Products and Services offered on this website are not intended for residents of the United States, Malaysia and Japan. Please click here to view our full disclaimer.

This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.