Quarterly Outlook
Macro Outlook: The US rate cut cycle has begun
Peter Garnry
Chief Investment Strategist
Summary: FedEx today is a perfect example of the dichotomy between bullish market sentiment and underlying fundamentals and earnings growth, but central bank liquidity is supporting sentiment as political risk premium drops.
Equities continue to rally hard, despite pausing for breath today. Sentiment across global markets remains optimistic with broad based buying in play as a string of record highs set for US equities leads the march higher. Australian stocks are no exception and Monday saw the ASX rake in its best 1 day gain since the ScoMo election win, pushing the index back within a stones throw of its closing record high of 6863.99, hit on November 28th. Friday’s triple witching may temper gains towards the end of this week, but the stage looks set for equities to grind higher into next year as we touched upon earlier in the week.
The danger lies in how consensus that positioning is, but with liquidity being a primary driver of asset prices and Fed injecting approximately $500bln over the next month, stocks should push higher. Meaning 2020 will begin on a very different footing to last, without a large correction in valuations or peaking pessimism, but instead extended valuations and substantial optimistic assumptions as a lot of the positives are already discounted with the large majority of gains driven by multiple expansion. Monetary policy is a powerful determinant of asset prices, and one thing QE and financial repression has taught is asset price inflation. Obviously the inability of such policies to produce a self-sustaining revival in growth, without stoking record wealth inequality, social unrest, and global political risk is a problem for another day. At which point, the answer is likely more of the same liquidity injections!
As positioning continues to turn more bullish, the present environment risks a return to the euphoric sentiment, or melt up scenarios that have previously ended in tears, cue 2000 and 2018. Although, if history is anything to go by, not without further upside for risk assets throughout Q1 2020. In 1999 the Federal Reserve Board approved a special loan facility to ease any liquidity pressures on banks that may have arisen into year end, which sent the Nasdaq surging higher into Q1 2000. Indeed, the current divergence between valuations and underlying income is likely rivalled only by the dynamics of the year 2000. Given that we believe monetary stimulus to date will not be enough to produce a prolonged recovery in growth and return to trend levels, so unlikely to do more than stabilise growth at low rates. Once growth concerns materialise again in 2020 that will not be supportive of current projected EPS growth assumptions. The outlook for earnings remains challenged, particularly in the US as labour costs rise and for Australia, with ASX stocks on course for the Asian regions worst profit growth next year as growth continues to disappoint. Although buybacks no doubt add an underlying support to the US story. Come February reporting season in Australia market performance and economic realities may be forced to converge once more.
FedEx today is a perfect example of that dichotomy between bullish market sentiment and underlying fundamentals and earnings growth. In after hours trade today shares took a hit after FedEx issued its second warning for fiscal 2020 profit. “We incurred peak ramp-up costs in Q2, with none of the revenue benefit,” Rajesh Subramaniam, FedEx president said on a conference call with analysts.
As we enter 2020 the key test will then be whether green shoots actually translate into a return to trend growth, and whether the narrative of receding geopolitical risks can be maintained.
The truce is good news for global economy, and the threat of further tariff hikes is significantly reduced which is important for maintaining supportive environment for the reflation/green shoots narrative and stabilisation in growth into 2020. However, details are scant, Chinese purchase commitments are ambitious and the process seems messy an uncoordinated with no finalised legal text. Agreeing on the translated legal text alone, will likely be no mean feat. The bad news, the deal stands a chance of not entering into force as there already seems to be differences between what the 2 sides are purporting is included. And although details are light, it doesn’t look like anything new has been brought to the table and the deal largely consists of and repackaging reforms already in the pipeline that China was moving toward anyway. The ambitious purchase commitments seem unlikely to be reached and it would be misguided to assume President Trump who has built his legacy on standing up to China will let noncompliance slide. Meaning the risk of another break down is not negligible. Tariffs remain, the US average tariff on imports from China will fall only a small amount to 19.3%, from current level of 21.0%. The trade war persists, and the relationship has suffered permanent damage. The ongoing technology war remains and bifurcation is a key risk, although perhaps remains something more abstract for financial markets (at least for now).
US foreign policy remains unpredictable and with the phase 1 deal out of the way and USMCA done, there is nothing stopping President Trump from turning his attention to Europe once more.
The US elections bring with them a host of risks, notably a Warren candidacy would be particularly market unfriendly.
And on growth, which continues below trend, we have been here before in terms of green shoots, only to see them trampled on. An ongoing inventory rebuild and correction will add to the stabilisation story in early 2020. But the current stabilisation more likely represents a mini reflation within an ongoing late cycle slowdown in growth, which will likely re-appear by 2H2020. The Phase 1 deal is unlikely to be enough to truly revive animal spirits and reignite capex, it is not comprehensive enough and does not include enough roll back of tariffs. China’s structural rebalancing of growth toward domestic consumption and services will continue to pressure the growth and inflation outlook globally. China is no longer the driving engine of global growth with huge credit fuelled stimulus packages ready to reignite reflationary pulses. Leading indicators of employment in the US continue to deteriorate, so whilst green shoots may be driving sentiment now, it is the time to remain avidly data dependant. We remain sceptical in the ability for monetary policy to truly revive growth sustainably without the complimentary push from fiscal policy.
Once these concerns build again in 2020, market performance and economic realities may be forced to converge once more. But, monetary policymakers have already exhibited their willingness to step in with added stimulus measures in an attempt to extend the cycle. And whilst any correction may be painful, the continuing low yield environment, means we continue to see any corrective moves, whilst painful, being bought as investors sitting on the sidelines with dry powder step in when valuations correct enough. When it comes to fiscal policy, once growth lags once more, the push for action from fiscal policymakers will grow louder. But given the present reluctance, more pain in markets or economic data will be needed in order to force capitulation.
Disclaimer
The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.
Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-gb/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)