Is the momentum premium finally being arbitraged away? Is the momentum premium finally being arbitraged away? Is the momentum premium finally being arbitraged away?

Is the momentum premium finally being arbitraged away?

Equities 11 minutes to read
Peter Garnry

Head of Saxo Strats

Summary:  More and more momentum strategies and momentum-based funds are popping up, but this factor is being arbitraged away much faster than their promoters are willing to admit.

Two days ago I offered a warning on momentum investing. We promised arguments and evidence, so here it goes.
Peter Garnry on Twitter
Source: @petergarnry
So what is the momentum factor? In mathematical terms it's the total return over the past 12 months minus the latest month. The reason that the latest month’s return is subtracted is because studies show mean-reversion effects in the short-term. The momentum factor can then be constructed in two ways: market-neutral or long-only. The typical way is the Fama-French methodology shown on their website using CRSP (Center for Research in Security Prices) data. The market-neutral momentum factor is found by calculating the equal-weighted return on a portfolio of the 30th percentile- and 70th percentile-ranked stocks on momentum and then subtracting the highest percentile portfolio from the lowest percentile. The long-only version is typically the top decile portfolio (the 10% stocks with the highest momentum).

We have been using the momentum factor in our various trading strategies for years. We are sure that almost any quant-driven outfit has various forms of momentum factors featured in their machine learning models. On top of that there is the old equity factor guard that implement the momentum factor more purely, as in Fama-French. Momentum is one of those factors with the longest track record of showing a premium over the market return, but the period following the Great Financial Crisis has been tough for the momentum factor. The duration is now so long that it raises the question of whether the momentum factor has been arbitraged away.

Why is this question so important? Because as I wrote two days ago, the number of momentum-driven strategies is staggering. The marketing machine behind momentum is large and this is likely because it is simple to explain for retail investors and the entry barrier is very low as the trading strategy is not very sophisticated.

We feel an obligation to warn about momentum investing because we believe it will not deliver the same returns as it did before.

If we start with the market-neutral momentum factor, then the 'long-only US momentum portfolio' chart below shows why momentum investing has been so popular. Excluding the pre-WWII period, momentum investing generated 0.8% monthly alpha before trading and financing costs. The big question is whether the momentum after these costs was all that profitable because accessing shares to short-sell was not easy until the 1990s. What stands out, though, is the period after the GFC: we observe a clear dilution of the momentum premium with most months actually showing negative premium. Another important observation is that market-neutral momentum factor returns decline during bear markets. If this behaviour holds going forward, then momentum investors will likely experience poor returns over the coming years as we are likely closer to the end of this bull market.
US momentum factor portfolio
The long-only version of momentum investing is the style being pushed most heavily to the public through ETFs, mutual funds, and discretionary portfolio strategies. The chart below shows the 10-year monthly average excess return in percentage terms (versus the S&P 500) on the top decline momentum portfolio from Fama-French.

The degrading in factor premium starts earlier than in the market-neutral but since both portfolios do not include implementation costs it is likely that the degrading starts around the same time. We have plotted key events around momentum investing with the famous 1993 paper by Jegadeesh & Titman that was the first academic paper illuminating the momentum factor. However, some variations of this momentum factor have likely been used by hedge funds during the 1980s as the breakout trend-following systems used by futures and commodity traders broke down.

The two ETF launches on momentum from AQR and iShares in 2009 and 2013 respectively have opened up the gate to the public expanding momentum investing’s footprint on the market. What we observe in the long-only momentum portfolio is again degrading under bear markets as well as the worst period for momentum since the 1930s. The estimated average monthly premium versus the S&P 500 is around 25 basis points, which is still good but keep in mind that this is before implementation costs.
Long-only US momentum portfolio
AQR’s Large Cap Momentum Style Fund shows the longest live track record that we know of for active momentum investing. AQR is a sophisticated institutional investment management firm that likely possesses solid trade execution models. If any firm is able to crank out the long-only momentum factor after implementation costs, it should be AQR. However, if we compare the fund’s performance against Vanguard’s S&P 500 ETF tracker then active momentum investing on US equities delivered annualised 0.45%-points of negative alpha (see chart below).

If we do the comparison with the iShares momentum ETF on US equities you will not find alpha either. To be fair, against the momentum factor the recent degrading is within the statistical confidence band and might very well rebound to its previous monthly premium. Cliff Asness, the CEO and co-founder of AQR, recently talked about the disappointment in factor investing in his Liquid Alt Ragnarök paper.

AQR’s momentum fund has $1.08 billion in AUM as of yesterday and the iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF has $10.02bn as of yesterday, up from $4bn last year in October. On top of that, momentum is used as a feature in machine learning models and is implemented by do-it-yourself investors and discretionary portfolio advisors. 
While there is a probability that we are just seeing a departure from the past mean premium in momentum, I believe there are logical causes behind why momentum has been arbitraged away for good. Implementation costs have fallen, making the strategy accessible by more investors. ETF and mutual funds applying the momentum strategy are growing in numbers and assets under management, meaning that more money is chasing the same factor premium.

As momentum investing is a high-turnover and liquidity-demanding investing strategy, it means that we may be close to, or have already exceeded, the capacity for momentum investing. As access to computer power grows and implementation costs fall, all simple investing strategies will be arbitraged away. The momentum factor will not escape this fact. Our view is that momentum investing will disappoint going forward and the sharp rise in momentum funds everywhere is a frightening signal.

In Denmark, we are actually seeing momentum strategies being sold to the public on the leading benchmark index OMXC25. Think about this for a while.. the momentum factor is a broad-based premium that has held up over many decades (excluding the recent degrading), but when momentum is chased in a small subset of the total sample it becomes very speculative and likely data snooping – or fooled by randomness, as Nassim Taleb would put it.

Let’s say that you invest in the 10 best-performing stocks in the OMXC25 based on some version of the momentum factor. What you are really betting on, then, is that out of the 5,000 stocks in the MSCI World Index these 10 shares, constantly rebalancedc will deliver consistent alpha. This is despite the fact that the broad-based momentum factor has shown sharp degrading.

Yes, the momentum factor can be implemented in different ways, but betting on a subset of 10 stocks out of 5,000 is to us a very high-risk strategy that could leave one chasing a mirage.

Again, simple strategies will be arbitraged away.


The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (
- Full disclaimer (

40 Bank Street, 26th floor
E14 5DA
United Kingdom

Contact Saxo

Select region

United Kingdom
United Kingdom

Trade Responsibly
All trading carries risk. To help you understand the risks involved we have put together a series of Key Information Documents (KIDs) highlighting the risks and rewards related to each product. Read more
Additional Key Information Documents are available in our trading platform.

Saxo is a registered Trading Name of Saxo Capital Markets UK Ltd (‘Saxo’). Saxo is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, Firm Reference Number 551422. Registered address: 26th Floor, 40 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5DA. Company number 7413871. Registered in England & Wales.

This website, including the information and materials contained in it, are not directed at, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in the United States, Belgium or any other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to applicable law or regulation.

It is important that you understand that with investments, your capital is at risk. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. It is your responsibility to ensure that you make an informed decision about whether or not to invest with us. If you are still unsure if investing is right for you, please seek independent advice. Saxo assumes no liability for any loss sustained from trading in accordance with a recommendation.

Apple, iPad and iPhone are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Android is a trademark of Google Inc.

©   since 1992