Outrageous Predictions
Switzerland's Green Revolution: CHF 30 Billion Initiative by 2050
Katrin Wagner
Head of Investment Content Switzerland
SpaceX’s Nasdaq 100 entry could force passive funds to buy, creating near-term demand.
Passive flows can move prices, but they do not replace profits, cash flow or execution.
Investors should separate the index effect from the SpaceX business case.
SpaceX has spent years making rockets reusable. Now public markets are testing whether investor enthusiasm is reusable too.
After its record initial public offering on 12 June 2026, SpaceX is already heading into the Nasdaq 100 on 7 July 2026, according to multiple reports. That matters because many funds copy the index. When the index adds a company, those funds usually need to buy it. Not because a fund manager had a sudden vision of Mars over breakfast, but because the rulebook says so.
The passive-flow story may support demand in the short term, but it does not remove the normal investor questions: what is the business worth, how fast can it grow, and how much risk is already in the price?
Passive investing is simple in theory. An exchange-traded fund, or ETF, tracks an index such as the Nasdaq 100. If the index owns Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia and now SpaceX, the ETF tries to own the same basket in roughly the same weights.
That creates mechanical buying. J.P. Morgan reportedly estimates that Nasdaq 100 inclusion could trigger about 4.3 billion USD of passive demand for SpaceX shares. Russell index inclusion has already added another layer of expected buying. For a normal company, that would be interesting. For a newly listed mega-cap with a limited public float, it can be very interesting.
Free float means the shares that are actually available to trade. If most shares are held by insiders and long-term holders, fewer shares move around the market. When passive funds need to buy a lot of shares in a narrow window, the price can jump around. Think of trying to get a whole football crowd through one small door. Everyone may be polite, but elbows still appear.
This does not mean passive flows are fake. They are real orders from real funds. But they are also one-off, or at least event-driven. Once the index funds have bought, the next buyer needs another reason.
SpaceX is not only a rocket company. It builds and launches rockets, runs Starlink satellite internet, and sits near the centre of several big themes: space infrastructure, communications, defence, and artificial intelligence infrastructure. That is why investors are excited. SpaceX looks less like a moonshot and more like a toll road to orbit, with satellites as the traffic.
Still, a high-quality story can become an expensive stock. The passive-flow trade can lift short-term demand, but it cannot make valuation irrelevant. Index inclusion changes who owns the shares. It does not change how many satellites SpaceX launches, how profitable Starlink becomes, or how much capital the company needs for future projects.
There is also a hidden portfolio lesson. Passive funds do not only buy the new entrant. They often need to sell small pieces of existing holdings to make room. That means index changes can spread across the market. SpaceX may receive the spotlight, while other index members quietly pay for the seating arrangement.
For investors, the key is to avoid mixing two separate questions. The first is whether passive flows can support the share price around inclusion. They can. The second is whether SpaceX will justify its valuation over many years. That depends on execution, margins, regulation, competition and capital discipline. One is plumbing. The other is business quality.
The main risk is that investors treat index inclusion as a guarantee. It is not. Passive funds may buy because they must, but active investors can still sell because they want to. If early buyers bought mainly for the flow event, some may leave once the event passes. The guest list changes quickly when the music stops.
The second risk is valuation. SpaceX is being priced as a rare company with several large growth engines. That may be fair one day, but the market can punish even excellent companies if expectations run ahead of results. Investors should watch Starlink customer growth, cash generation, launch cadence, debt issuance and any signs that capital spending keeps rising faster than revenue.
The third risk is index disappointment. SpaceX is joining the Nasdaq 100, but S&P Dow Jones Indices has not rushed it into the S&P 500. That matters because S&P 500-linked assets are enormous. A slower path there reduces the idea that every passive fund must buy immediately.
SpaceX has made markets look up again, and the index machine is now adding its own thrust. That can matter in the short term. Mechanical buying can lift a stock, especially when freely traded shares are limited. But investors should remember the simple truth behind the spectacle: rockets need engines, not applause.
The same applies to stocks. Passive flows may help SpaceX clear the launchpad, but the long journey will still depend on profits, cash flow and execution. In markets, gravity rarely disappears. It usually just waits for investors to stop looking at the countdown.
This material is marketing content and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results. The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options.