Whisk_57ca955f6fbfd7eb60849dbdb119ff08dr

Should investors abandon AI as software stocks slide?

Charu Chanana 400x400
Charu Chanana

Chief Investment Strategist

Key points:

  • Software stocks are under pressure after fresh AI launches, including Anthropic’s legal productivity tool, Claude Cowork, and Google’s Project Genie. Investors are asking if the AI story is hitting a speedbump.
  • But the divergence matters: Semiconductors are outperforming software, signalling this isn’t a broad AI exit — it’s a leadership shift within the AI trade.
  • Markets are moving from broad AI enthusiasm to selectivity, splitting exposure between AI enablers (bottlenecks) and AI adopters (software/SaaS) where value capture and pricing power are less certain.


AI is not being abandoned by markets. It is being priced more carefully.

Over the past few weeks, the underperformance of software and SaaS stocks has sparked a familiar question: is the AI trade breaking down? The answer is no. What we are seeing instead is a shift from broad AI enthusiasm to a more selective, more demanding phase of the story — one that is forcing investors to distinguish between hype and defensible value.

This is not about giving up on technology or artificial intelligence. It is about identifying where the real bottlenecks, moats, and profit pools are likely to sit as AI moves from promise to practice.

The moment that changed the tone

Recent AI product announcements have sharpened this debate, because they made the pace of disruption feel more immediate — and more practical.

  • Anthropic’s new legal productivity tool is designed for in-house legal teams, aiming to automate tasks like contract review, NDA triage, compliance workflows, legal briefings, and templated responses (with human oversight).
  • Claude Cowork is Anthropic’s more “agent-like” desktop assistant, built to work across files and common workplace tasks — and now extended with specialised plug-ins that can execute workflows in areas like legal, sales, marketing, and analysis.
  • Google’s Project Genie is an experimental tool that turns a text prompt or image into a short, interactive world you can explore and remix in real time — a vivid example of how generative AI is expanding from text to richer, more complex outputs.

Put together, these moves pushed the conversation from “AI helps” to “AI replaces or automates,” and that is what changed the tone.

When AI starts to replicate tasks traditionally performed by professionals — drafting, analysing, coding, reviewing — it naturally raises questions about the long-term pricing power of certain software products. Investors are no longer impressed simply by the presence of AI features.

This is why the pressure has shown up most clearly in SaaS: it’s where the market is first forced to debate what AI will replace, who retains pricing power, and who absorbs the costs of adoption.

Why SaaS is feeling it first

SaaS sits closest to the point where AI can change behaviour quickly. Many SaaS models are built around per-seat pricing, recurring subscriptions, and workflow dependency. AI challenges each of these assumptions.

If AI can automate parts of a workflow, customers may need fewer seats. If AI becomes embedded at the platform or operating-system level, the standalone value of individual SaaS tools can be questioned. And if AI raises computing and development costs before it raises revenue, margins come under scrutiny.

This does not mean SaaS is broken. It means SaaS is being stress-tested.

Markets are asking simple, practical questions:

  • Can AI strengthen pricing power, or does it risk commoditising output?
  • Does AI deepen customer lock-in, or make switching easier?
  • How quickly can higher costs turn into sustainable revenue?

These questions are harder to answer for SaaS than for other parts of the tech stack.

The divergence tells the story

The clearest signal of this shift is the growing divergence between software stocks and semiconductors.

4_CHCA_AI divergence

Chipmakers and infrastructure providers sit at the heart of AI spending. They benefit when models get larger, workloads grow heavier, and demand for computing power rises. Their revenues are tied to volume and usage, not to how end-users price productivity.

SaaS companies, by contrast, sit at the edge where AI changes user behaviour first. That makes their earnings more sensitive to disruption risk, pricing debates, and execution.

This divergence is not a vote against AI. It is a signal that investors are differentiating between who enables AI and who may be disrupted by it.

Bottlenecks, moats, and where value tends to stick

When technology evolves quickly, value often accrues first to the bottlenecks — the parts of the system that everyone needs and cannot easily bypass.

In AI, those bottlenecks include:

  • Computing power and chips
  • Manufacturing and advanced tooling
  • Data centres, networking, and cloud infrastructure

These areas benefit regardless of which application wins. They are the “picks and shovels” of the AI build-out.

SaaS, meanwhile, sits further downstream where success depends on execution: defending workflows, proving return on investment, and integrating AI in a way that customers are willing to pay for.

This does not make SaaS unattractive. It makes it selective.

Rotation, not capitulation

What markets are experiencing now is rotation, not abandonment — and that rotation reflects a maturing AI narrative.

In the early phase of any major technology shift, markets tend to reward broad exposure. The story matters more than the numbers. As adoption deepens, that balance flips. Monetisation starts to matter more than demonstrations. Cash flow matters more than optionality. Moats matter more than speed.

This is why capital is rotating:

  • From stories to cash flows
  • From distant promises to near-term delivery
  • From broad exposure to selective positioning

At this stage, it is genuinely difficult to know which application-layer and SaaS players will ultimately emerge as winners or losers. Questions around what AI will replace, who retains pricing power, and who absorbs the costs of adoption are still being worked through.

That uncertainty explains why investors are gravitating toward bottlenecks and infrastructure first — areas that benefit regardless of which applications win — while becoming more selective within SaaS.

This pattern is familiar from previous technology cycles. Early leaders are often infrastructure and enablers. Application-layer winners tend to emerge later, once business models stabilise and value capture becomes clearer.

For investors, this phase is uncomfortable but healthy. It reduces excess, forces discipline, and creates differentiation.

What this means for investors

The key takeaway is not to exit technology or AI, but to rethink how exposure is built.

A few practical lenses help:

  • AI exposure is not the same as SaaS exposure.
  • Not all SaaS faces the same disruption risk.
  • Diversification across the tech stack matters more as dispersion rises.

Investors should expect:

  • Greater earnings sensitivity in SaaS
  • Sharper market reactions to guidance and pricing commentary
  • Continued leadership from areas tied directly to AI spending and infrastructure

In practice, that can mean keeping a core anchored in bottlenecks or enablers such as semis, networking, and infrastructure, and then adding a sleeve of software/adopters, but with a higher bar on moats and treat as higher disruption risk the tools where AI can commoditise the “first draft” output and put pressure on seat-based pricing.

The risk to this view is clear. If SaaS companies demonstrate faster-than-expected monetisation and durable pricing power from AI, sentiment can turn quickly.

Explore our AI value-chain shortlist to see how different parts of the AI ecosystem are being expressed across infrastructure, enablers, and software.

The bottom line

AI is not losing relevance. It is gaining accountability.

The current underperformance of SaaS reflects a more nuanced market that is asking harder questions about moats, margins, and monetisation. This is how long-term winners are ultimately identified.

The AI era is moving from excitement to execution. For investors, the challenge — and the opportunity — lies in separating those who control the bottlenecks from those still proving their place in the value chain.


This material is marketing content and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results.
The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options..

Outrageous Predictions 2026

01 /

  • Switzerland's Green Revolution: CHF 30 Billion Initiative by 2050

    Outrageous Predictions

    Switzerland's Green Revolution: CHF 30 Billion Initiative by 2050

    Katrin Wagner

    Head of Investment Content Switzerland

    Switzerland launches a CHF 30 billion energy revolution by 2050, rivaling Lindt & Sprüngli's market ...
  • The Swiss Fortress – 2026

    Outrageous Predictions

    The Swiss Fortress – 2026

    Erik Schafhauser

    Senior Relationship Manager

    Swiss voters reject EU ties, boosting the Swiss Franc and sparking Switzerland's "Souveränität Zuers...
  • Executive Summary: Outrageous Predictions 2026

    Outrageous Predictions

    Executive Summary: Outrageous Predictions 2026

    Saxo Group

    Read Saxo's Outrageous Predictions for 2026, our latest batch of low probability, but high impact ev...
  • A Fortune 500 company names an AI model as CEO

    Outrageous Predictions

    A Fortune 500 company names an AI model as CEO

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

    Can AI be trusted to take over in the boardroom? With the right algorithms and balanced human oversi...
  • Dollar dominance challenged by Beijing’s golden yuan

    Outrageous Predictions

    Dollar dominance challenged by Beijing’s golden yuan

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

    Beijing does an end-run around the US dollar, setting up a framework for settling trade in a neutral...
  • Dumb AI triggers trillion-dollar clean-up

    Outrageous Predictions

    Dumb AI triggers trillion-dollar clean-up

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

    Agentic AI systems are deployed across all sectors, and after a solid start, mistakes trigger a tril...
  • Quantum leap Q-Day arrives early, crashing crypto and destabilizing world finance

    Outrageous Predictions

    Quantum leap Q-Day arrives early, crashing crypto and destabilizing world finance

    Neil Wilson

    Investor Content Strategist

    A quantum computer cracks today’s digital security, bringing enough chaos with it that Bitcoin crash...
  • SpaceX announces an IPO, supercharging extraterrestrial markets

    Outrageous Predictions

    SpaceX announces an IPO, supercharging extraterrestrial markets

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    Financial markets go into orbit, to the moon and beyond as SpaceX expands rocket launches by orders-...
  • Taylor Swift-Kelce wedding spikes global growth

    Outrageous Predictions

    Taylor Swift-Kelce wedding spikes global growth

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    Next year’s most anticipated wedding inspires Gen Z to drop the doomscrolling and dial up the real w...
  • Despite concerns, U.S. 2026 mid-term elections proceed smoothly

    Outrageous Predictions

    Despite concerns, U.S. 2026 mid-term elections proceed smoothly

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    In spite of outstanding threats to the American democratic process, the US midterms come and go cord...

This content is marketing material.

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank Switzerland and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

Saxo Bank Switzerland’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Saxo Bank Switzerland partners with companies that provide compensation for promotional activities conduced on its platform. Additionally, Saxo Bank Switzerland has agreements with certain partners who provide retrocession contingent upon clients purchasing specific products offered by these partners.

While Saxo Bank Switzerland receives compensation from these partnerships, all educational and research content remains focused on providing information to clients.  

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo Bank Switzerland does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

The content of this website represents marketing material and is not the result of financial analysis or research. It has therefore not been prepared in accordance with directives of the Swiss Bankers Association designed to promote the independence of financial research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of the marketing material.

Saxo Bank (Schweiz) AG
The Circle 38
CH-8058
Zürich-Flughafen
Switzerland

Contact Saxo

Switzerland
Switzerland

All trading carries risk. Losses can exceed deposits on margin products. You should consider whether you understand how our products work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. To help you understand the risks involved we have put together a general Risk Warning series of Key Information Documents (KIDs) highlighting the risks and rewards related to each product. The KIDs can be accessed within the trading platform. Please note that the full prospectus can be obtained free of charge from Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. or the issuer.

This website can be accessed worldwide however the information on the website is related to Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. All clients will directly engage with Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. and all client agreements will be entered into with Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. and thus governed by Swiss Law. 

The content of this website represents marketing material and has not been notified or submitted to any supervisory authority.

If you contact Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. or visit this website, you acknowledge and agree that any data that you transmit to Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd., either through this website, by telephone or by any other means of communication (e.g. e-mail), may be collected or recorded and transferred to other Saxo Bank Group companies or third parties in Switzerland or abroad and may be stored or otherwise processed by them or Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. You release Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. from its obligations under Swiss banking and securities dealer secrecies and, to the extent permitted by law, data protection laws as well as other laws and obligations to protect privacy. Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. has implemented appropriate technical and organizational measures to protect data from unauthorized processing and disclosure and applies appropriate safeguards to guarantee adequate protection of such data.

Apple, iPad and iPhone are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc.