220519 MineM

There's a trade war upside for this Aussie rare earths miner

Macro 5 minutes to read
Strats-Eleanor-88x88
Eleanor Creagh

Australian Market Strategist

Summary:  As in independent miner in an environment overwhelmingly dominated by Chinese interests, Australia's Lynas is poised to benefit as the trade war heats up and the market realises the weapon potential of rare earth minerals.


This is an update on our previous trade recommendations to buy Lynas Corp (ASX:LYC), a company that explores, mines and produces rare earth minerals.

Australia-based Lynas still remains in a pivotal position as it is only miner and processor/producer of rare earths worldwide outside of China. As we said in March, in a world of heightened geopolitical tensions, a non-Chinese supplier has a significant competitive advantage for manufacturers and businesses wishing to diversify supply chains away from China, making it a supplier of choice for non-Chinese customers. 

On Monday (May 20), Lynas revealed plans to develop rare earths separation capacity in Texas together with Blue Line, a US rare earths processor. This is a strategic move as trade tensions ratchet higher and speculation that rare earths could be weaponised grows. The company also announced on Tuesday (May 21) at its investor day that it will spend AU$500 million by 2025 to build up its operations in Western Australia in order to transition cracking and leaching away from Malaysia. 

Trade tensions continue to escalate, and negotiations have entered a more dangerous phase, but the market continues to underestimate the geopolitical risk. The trade war is obviously not the only driver of equity market returns but it could be a key decider in whether the S&P 500 ends the year higher or lower.

The uncertainty paralyses decision making for multinational companies, burdens capex intentions and forces supply chains to be unravelled in order to remove risk. The assumption among most participants is that a deal will eventually be reached, this could still be the case, although it is likely a long way off. Given the trajectory of the rhetoric a G20 deal would be nothing short of a miracle. On that basis we stand by previous observations that it would be complacent to rely on the hope of a deal as an appropriate risk management strategy.
  
It has become ever more apparent that trade is a sideshow for a long-running economic conflict and battle for tech dominance and hegemony.  We first visited this last year, where we highlighted that there was an increasing probability of a “cold war” emerging fought through technological supremacy. The tech cold war has now begun, as the US moves to blacklist China’s tech champions, and rare earths could be in the crosshairs of China’s retaliation.

Last week Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to a rare earths mining base in China was no accident and was meant to send a message to the US. This has fuelled speculation that the strategic materials will soon be weaponised as China may exercise its dominant status in the rare earths industry.

Rare earths are crucial for a number of high growth, high-tech commercial industries including hybrid and electric vehicles, renewable energy (wind turbines), energy-efficient lighting, advanced electronics, military devices, chemicals, and medical equipment. Without rare earths a number of high-tech industry applications would not be viable. Take the iPhone as an example: screens are polished with lanthanum and cerium and within the phone is a magnet made with neodymium and praseodymium.  

As demand for magnetic materials grows Improved pricing for REO is expected to continue, benefitting Lynas. Permanent magnets, containing NdPr which Lynas is the second largest producer of globally, are a key enabler of electric vehicle technology, wind turbines, automation, electronics and medical equipment
220519 magnetic products
Source: Shades of Grey, Wikipedia
The rare earth market is dominated by low-cost producer China and Chinese rare earth producers have benefited from government support and huge subsidies aimed at providing a competitive advantage.
220519 Rare earth giant
Source: Bloomberg
The US imports 80% of its rare earth needs from China and with rare earths crucial to so many industries; defence, autos, renewable energy, smartphones, batteries and more, there is no doubt that if China were to weaponise these materials with an export ban this would cause serious disruption to US industry. But this wouldn’t come without consequence for China, they would shoot their own industry in the foot and cripple confidence in China as a supplier of rare earths. Not to mention this would take the trade war escalation to another level.
220519 CHina Dependent
Source: Bloomberg
There is precedent for China to exercise its dominant position in rare earths as geopolitical leverage. In 2010, China limited rare-earth exports to Japan, while the two countries were scrapping over disputed islands. This menace to the rare earths supply chain caused prices to spike (see below chart) something Lynas would benefit from as the second largest producer of NdPr globally. As prices picked up investment flowed back into both new and old rare earth mining projects. If you look back to 2010/2011 when prices were soaring there were over 500 companies listed on the ASX with rare earths prospects, there is no doubt if any export ban was implemented a similar reaction would ensue rendering the political leverage short term at best. 

Rare earths are counterintuitively not very “rare” but are difficult to find in deposits that are not contaminated enabling them to be mined economically. The rare earth element cerium is actually the 25th most abundant on Earth, making it about as common as copper! Other countries like Australia, US, Japan, Brazil, India, Vietnam and South Africa also have rare earth deposits and even now, when the threat is just thinly veiled, there are likely mines scrambling to ramp up production to hedge against any potential move from China and take advantage of increased prices. A potential problem for these countries is rare earths are often found in conjunction with thorium, a radioactive metal, that requires special handling.

The simple threat of China implementing an export ban on critical industrial materials highlights a vulnerability that is ripe for exploit, however short-term the strategy may be. Globalisation has created global networks and supply chains that are under assault as the trade war escalates. As tensions ratchet higher so does the potential for China to exploit this vulnerability for geostrategic gain leaving Lynas poised to benefit. 
220519 Mid price
Source: Bloomberg NdPr Prices

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Upending the global order at blinding speed

    Quarterly Outlook

    Upending the global order at blinding speed

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ...
  • Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Quarterly Outlook

    Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Quarterly Outlook

    China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    Quarterly Outlook

    FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Quarterly Outlook

    Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Althea Spinozzi

    Head of Fixed Income Strategy

Content disclaimer

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15
2900
Hellerup
Denmark

Contact Saxo

Select region

International
International

All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.