background image background image background image

Opec: Common sense will prevail

Picture of Ole Hansen
Ole Hansen

Head of Commodity Strategy

Opec ministers have started to arrive in Vienna for their meeting on Friday, a gathering which is already being described as possibly the most difficult since 2011. Back then, of course, a group of countries including Venezuela and Iran blocked a Saudi Arabian attempt to raise the group's production in order to curb soaring oil prices. Ali al-Naimi, the Saudi oil minister at the time, had called for a collective increase of 1.5 million barrels/day in order curb skyrocketing prices.

After hitting a post-global financial crisis low at $40/barrel in 2009, the disruptions in North Africa and the Middle East caused by the Arab Spring saw Brent crude oil soar above $120/b by April 2011. 

Source: Saxo Bank

Saudi Arabia chose to ignore the refusal and during the first eight months of 2011 increased production by 1.6 million b/d. As a result, the price of oil stabilised and subsequently spent the following three years averaging $110/b before surging US shale oil production helped send it sharply lower during the second half of 2014.

Fast forward and we now find an oil price that has recovered from the 2016 low of $27/b to around $75/b. By successfully implementing and maintaining a production ceiling since January 2017, Opec together with a group of non-Opec producers led by Russia have managed to keep the price on an upward trajectory since last June. With the global overhang of supply gone and Brent crude challenging $80/b, Russia and Saudi Arabia surprised the market last month by starting to talk about raising production. 

Faced with rising pressure from emerging market economies feeling the economic impact of rising fuel costs, a stronger dollar, and higher (dollar) funding costs, the Saudis felt the need to adjust production instead of risking slowing demand growth.  Once again, however, the decision has become a political hot potato. Not least after President Trump singled out Opec as being the culprit behind surging oil prices in an April tweet.

Iran’s oil minister instead put the blame squarely on the US given the current sanctions on Venezuela, and soon Iran as well. 

Trump's tweet
Source: @realDonaldTrump

The main reason why a production rise is back on the agenda is Opec’s over delivery of production cuts. The economic collapse in Venezuela and problems in Angola have seen those countries' production levels fall below their target by more than 600,000 barrels/day. Raising production in order to return the collective compliance to 100% from its current +160% would not alter the agreement to keep production capped. The only question would be how to share the beans among those few producers, including Saudi Arabia and Russia, that are currently able to increase output. 

Venezuelan and Angolan production

On that basis,we expect Opec to agree to maintain the current ceiling while agreeing to increase production in order to return compliance towards 100%.

Iran and Venezuela may end up opposing the agreement, but as we saw in 201, this would not prevent other producers from going on their own. 

The price impact should therefore be limited with no producer currently wanting to see their hard work unravel by raising production by more than the market can absorb. Brent crude is likely to remain within a $71 to $81/b range for the foreseeable future. In the short term, supply disruptions will continue to support the market while later on towards 2019 questions about demand growth strength may begin to attract negative price attention.

The risk of supply being disrupted has once again been highlighted by the collapse this week in exports from Libya. This after recent fighting led to the closure of the important Ras Lanuf oil port. The market reaction has been relatively subdued given the focus on Vienna but it highlights the continued short to medium term risk of higher prices. Something that helps justify Saudi’s attempt to keep prices capped by turning up the oil taps a couple of notches. 

A looming trade war between the US and China together with the mentioned risk of an EM slowdown spreading to DM may both limit the upside to crude and therefore also the need for strong action from the oil ministers meeting in Vienna.

Crude oil
Source: Saxo Bank

Twitter users can follow events as they unfold from dozens of the finest energy reporters in Vienna by using the hashtag #OOTT.

Later today at 14:30 GMT the US Energy Information Administration will publish its weekly update on US stocks of oil and fuels together with trade data and production estimates.

The results and charts will be tweeted to our hashtag #SaxoStrats.

Given the current focus on Vienna, the price impact should be relatively limited unless we see a major divergence from expectations. 


The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (
Full disclaimer (
Full disclaimer (

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15

Contact Saxo

Select region


Trade responsibly
All trading carries risk. Read more. To help you understand the risks involved we have put together a series of Key Information Documents (KIDs) highlighting the risks and rewards related to each product. Read more

This website can be accessed worldwide however the information on the website is related to Saxo Bank A/S and is not specific to any entity of Saxo Bank Group. All clients will directly engage with Saxo Bank A/S and all client agreements will be entered into with Saxo Bank A/S and thus governed by Danish Law.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc, registered in the US and other countries and regions. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.