terug
Details Cookies
België
Om ervoor te zorgen dat u enkel handelt in de producten die het best bij u passen, herwerken wij momenteel onze passendheidstoetsen. Beleggen in dit product is daarom tijdelijk beperkt. Meer info.
Cookiebeleid

Deze website maakt gebruik van cookies om u een betere browse-ervaring te bieden. Dit is nodig om het functioneren van de site mogelijk te maken, te optimaliseren en te analyseren, maar ook om u gepersonaliseerde advertentie-inhoud te kunnen bieden en u in staat te stellen verbinding te maken met sociale media. Als u 'Alles accepteren' kiest, stemt u in met het gebruik van cookies en de daarmee gepaard gaande verwerking van persoonlijke gegevens. Selecteer 'Instemming beheren' om uw instemmingsvoorkeuren te beheren. U kunt te allen tijde uw voorkeuren wijzigen of uw instemming intrekken op de pagina met cookiebeleid. U kunt ons cookiebeleid hier en ons privacybeleid hier bekijken

Is the ‘balanced’ 60/40 equity/bond portfolio a thing of the past? Is the ‘balanced’ 60/40 equity/bond portfolio a thing of the past? Is the ‘balanced’ 60/40 equity/bond portfolio a thing of the past?

Is the ‘balanced’ 60/40 equity/bond portfolio a thing of the past?

Peter Siks

Beleggerstrainer SaxoAcademy

Samenvatting:  For years, it was thought that the balanced portfolio was a thing of the past. But recent developments may have changed that.


The 2022 investment year was an extraordinary one as both stocks and bonds went down hard, an unusual combination for the modern investor. In fact, the traditional ‘balanced’ portfolio of 60 percent stocks and 40 percent bonds saw the worst nominal performance in memory, at least since 1871 according to an FT article. The idea of the 60/40 portfolio is based on the assumption that growth rewards the stocks in the portfolio, while the bond portion performs a kind of income-generating buffer function and diversifier in downturns, due to recent years in which bonds were most often negatively correlated with stocks. The return over the last 40 years for the 60/40 portfolio has been about 7.5 percent per year with a volatility of 8.9 percent (by comparison, the volatility for the MSCI World equity index was 15 percent). But with the disastrous investment year 2022, can we argue that the 60/40 portfolio should be a thing of the past?

Just back in time

The outlook for the 60/40 portfolio was not strong in 2020 and 2021. Interest rates were extremely low globally and stocks were extremely expensive by almost any measure. The expected return on bonds (a mix of corporate and government bonds) was slightly above 1 percent, while the earnings yield in equities was a mere 3.5 percent. As the earnings yield is the inverse of the P/E ratio, an earnings yield of 3.3 percent, for example, requires a P/E ratio of 30.

Many analysts did warn of poor outcomes for equities on interest rate sensitivity at the time, noting that only ever lower interest rates (difficult when trillions in global bonds were trading at negative nominal yields) could support equity valuations, much less drive them higher still. With yields rising in 2022, the ‘valuation reality check’ was on the loose to reverse some of the massive equity market gains of 2020 and 2021. This, rather than any recessionary dynamic, which is the normal driver of bear markets (and bond market strength). 

But really, equity markets have been supported and valuations have risen in a secular move for most of the last 40 years by falling interest rates, even if shorter term cycles saw negative bond/equity correlations.

Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US)

Will the 60/40 portfolio make a comeback in the near term?

There is no question that the 60/40 portfolio had a near-death experience last year. But with much higher interest rates now and after a bear market in stock prices has been established, the starting points for a traditional 60/40 portfolio are a lot brighter than they were two years ago. A global basket of bonds yields around 3.5 percent (global aggregate in USD) and the earnings yield of the MSCI World is currently around 5 percent. 

Expected return

So what is the expected return of a 60/40 equity/bond portfolio? For bonds, the expected return can simply use the current return. For the equity portion, we can plug in the assumption of the historical average EPS growth rate of about 6 percent per year for the MSCI World. A part of the expected return is also the dividend yield, which has been about 2.5 percent over the last few years prior to the pandemic.

Points for consideration

It’s critical to know that expected return is no guarantee, and several factors require careful consideration for investment return prospects:

  • Will inflation continue to fall? This will have a bearing on interest rates, which will likely need to stabilise and even fall to achieve attractive returns this year. The market is currently assuming two more 0.25 percent rate hikes by the Fed and then a period of calm, with forward yields priced to drop next year. Given the unresolved underlying issues that are inflationary, this positive scenario is unlikely to materialise. A few issues: deglobalisation, the green transformation and too little investment in the real economy, such as in infrastructure and the extraction of commodities. Inflation is more likely to bottom around 3 to 4 percent rather than the 2.25 percent currently expected by the market. As a result, substantially falling interest rates will take longer than the market is now pricing in.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
  • How realistic are expectations of EPS growth? These expectations, while slightly lower in recent months, are still positive. The question is whether companies will be able to maintain margins – given inflation and weaker economic growth – and thus maintain profits. An actual recession in the US and Europe would be very negative for EPS. However, our expectation is that the likelihood of a recession in the US is low. A very strong labour market and the financial health of the US consumer could keep the US economy in better-than-expected shape this year.

Beleggen kent risico’s, uw inleg kan minder waard worden. 

De informatie op deze pagina is niet bedoeld als individueel beleggingsadvies of als een individuele aanbeveling tot het doen van bepaalde beleggingen. De beloning van de auteur van dit artikel staat/stond/zal niet direct of indirect in relatie (staan) met zijn specifieke aanbevelingen of standpunten. Ondanks het feit dat Saxo Bank alle zorgvuldigheid in acht neemt bij het samenstellen en onderhouden van deze pagina's, en daarbij gebruik maakt van bronnen die betrouwbaar geacht worden, kan Saxo Bank niet instaan voor de juistheid, volledigheid en actualiteit van de geboden informatie. Indien u zonder verificatie of advies gebruikmaakt van de verstrekte informatie, doet u dat voor eigen rekening en risico. Aan de informatie op deze pagina's kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend. Saxo Bank is een handelsnaam van BinckBank N.V.. Beleggen brengt risico’s met zich mee. Uw inleg kan minder waard worden. Meer informatie over de specifieke productrisico’s kunt u lezen op de productpagina’s.

Saxo Bank
Bijkantoor België,
Italiëlei 124, Bus 101
2000, Antwerpen,
België

In België is Saxo Bank de handelsnaam van BinckBank N.V. , een Nederlandse bank die onderdeel uitmaakt van de Saxo Bank Groep.

Neem contact op met Saxo

Select region

België
België

Als financiële instelling zien wij het als onze plicht om ervoor te zorgen dat onze klanten enkel in beleggingsproducten handelen die het best bij hen passen. Op dit moment herwerken wij onze passendheidstoetsen en hebben wij beslist de handel in complexere producten tijdelijk te beperken. Meer informatie over de betrokken producten en de duur van de beperking vindt u hier.