Quarterly Outlook

Asia investors looking to Europe, should keep it simple and focus on the ‘spin-off’ that is the UK

Kay Van-Petersen
Global Macro Strategist

Summary:  There are a number of potential tailwinds for a long-term bullish stance on UK assets.

Our Q3 focus is on the structural turning point for Europe, both politically in the landscapes of Germany, and potentially France. We’re also looking from a social, policy and long-term investment perspective on sustainability, climate crisis and ESG initiatives. Whilst some of the nuances between the core and peripherals of the eurozone may be lost to investors in Asia, sometimes it pays to keep a simple framework to take out the noise from the complex moving parts.

Let’s think of the European Union (EU) as a large conglomerate, made up of many different companies that are represented by countries. The likes of Germany and Sweden are companies predominantly focused on exports and industrials, whereas Spain and Greece would be skewed towards the service side of tourism and hospitality. The different economic models of these companies will lead to different needs at different times. This is the challenge behind an EU that is seemingly one on a monetary policy front, yet hugely fragmented on a fiscal and structural policy front. 

In this analogy, the UK represents the spin-off of one of these companies from the EU conglomerate. Spin-offs give a company the ability to be laser focused on their own objectives and on fulfilling the needs of their stakeholders. 

Risks to the UK Spin-Off

The case for being structurally bullish about UK assets, such as sterling, equities, property and businesses, naturally comes with several running risks. 

  • Hammer and dance calibrations with potential new Covid strains that could continue to delay the economic model getting back to full run rate.

  • Something happening to BoJo, who despite critics and fans alike, seems to be the right leader at the right time for the UK. It’s unclear whether anyone else could be as popular in shepherding the Conservative Party.

  • The border situation in Northern Ireland.

  • Reversal in the hawkish tone from the BoE – we have had some flip-flopping from the BoE earlier this year, even on the other side of Brexit.

  • The EU playing hard ball in post-Brexit trade negotiations.

  • Levels of debt accumulated in the system as a response to the Covid pandemic.

  • A potential increase in competition to London, due to the drain in talent and capex that has gone to the EU.

  • A stronger GBP could make it challenging for UK exporters, which the FTSE-100 has in spades.

The Layer Cake of Potential Tailwinds for being bullish about UK Assets

With those risks in mind, there are a number of potential tailwinds for a long-term bullish stance on UK assets. 

  1. It’s contrarian. Not many people are talking about being long on UK assets – more than likely this is a result of 4-5 years of the “Brexit Tunnel of Turbulence”.

  2. This also makes the UK market likely to be one of the most underweighted on a global landscape, as it would have been hard for asset allocators to justify exposure with no way of knowing if it was going to be a soft, hard or amicable Brexit.  

  3. Let’s not argue over the quality of the divorce; at the end of the day we are on the other side of Brexit… Keep Calm and Carry On. Bullish markets thrive on less uncertainty rather than more, and being on the other side of Brexit greatly reduces the level of uncertainty that UK businesses, capital allocators and investors have had to contend with for years. 

  4. The UK FTSE-100 equity index, now at around 7,000, is one of the few major equity indices that never got back to their pre-Covid levels of 7,500, let alone broke out higher as we have seen on a number of main indices.
    1. A move to the 7500–8000 range before year-end would be around a +7% to +14% move from these 7,000 levels.

    2. The FTSE-100 was down 14% for 2020, unlike most equity indexes such as the S&P 500, Nikkei, China A50 and Nasdaq, that were up 16%, 16%, 23% and 44% respectively. 

  5. It’s arguably one of the cheaper equity markets globally, for the valuation-focused gals and guys.
    1. 1-yr forward PE on the FTSE-100 is 13x, compared to 20x for the S&P 500 or 24x for the Nasdaq-100, or even the default “cheap Japanese equities” with a PE of 18x.

    2. To put it differently, based on 1-yr forward PE, the Nasdaq-100, S&P500 and Nikkei trade at a premium of +84%, +54% and +39% to their UK sister. 

  6.  It’s worth noting that despite the epic amount of fiscal and monetary policy support that we saw in the UK, we’ve seen much clearer evidence of asset class inflation in places like the US, Canada and Australia, with the UK still lagging. 

  7. The FTSE-100 is predominantly an index skewed towards value rather than growth names. It has heavy exposure towards cyclicals like financials and commodities which should do well in an inflation and rates-rising regime. Think BP, Glencore, UK Banks.

  8. Sterling is still at multi-decade lows – just the 40-year quarterly average for GBPUSD is around 1.60, a +14% (unlevered) move from these 1.40 levels… 

  9. The UK has been one of the leading countries globally on the vaccine roll-out and set the bell curve on 8th December by being the first to approve a vaccine and quickly executing a roll-out strategy.

    This implies two key things:

    One: It showcases the flexibility, autonomy and speed that the UK can move when being outside of the EU’s sloth-like speed with its endless miles of red tape and more in-fighting than a UFC weigh-in (just think how France and Belgium have fared in the fight against Covid).

    Two: The UK will emerge out of the Covid-induced savings and lack of activity to some serious spending both by consumers and companies as the economy and the rest of the world opens up. 

  10. The BoE has moved from potentially entertaining negative rates around 2020 year-end’s Brexit deadline to discussions being around tapering and a more hawkish policy. This should be Sterling bullish.  

  11. Say what you want about BoJo (The UK’s Teflon Don), yet the Conservative party continues to gain ground and even Covid could not take Boris out. BoJo is the right leader, at the right time for the UK. 

  12. The UK has a scarcity factor that cannot be easily replicated anywhere else; there is only one London, one Oxford and one Cambridge, in it’s in the sweet time zone between Asia and the Americas. The UK will always be a destination for the global elite in the form of capital, talent, education and demand for assets.  

  13. If things deteriorate further on EU relations in the future, the country will make themselves as competitive as they need to be. If they need to be the offshore private banking centre of Europe, they will be the offshore private banking centre of Europe.
     

2H21 Could Also See China’s Lagging Tech Names Climb…

Whilst the US tech giants such as Facebook, Google and Microsoft are pretty close to their ATHs, their Chinese counterparts are anything but. 

Names such as Alibaba HK$ 208, Tencent HK$ 608, Baidu HK$ 178, Weibo HK$ 48 and JD.Com HK$ 280, are off anything from -20% to -33% from recent ATHs. This is despite earnings being relatively strong across the China tech space, lower valuations than their US counterparts, the scarcity value of listed tech champions in Asia, the underlying domestic economic currents being sound, and a world that is slowly emerging from Covid fever and fatigue.

Alibaba is down by over 30% from recent highs, lagging its US Tech Cousins like FB and GOOG 

Q32021-KVP01
Source: Saxo Group and Bloomberg

It’s worth noting that China’s monetary policy has been tighter than in the rest of the world and is likely to stay put in 2H21, with risks likely being towards some accommodation in the second half of the year. 

On the other hand, we are almost certainly going to see a move towards tighter US fiscal policy in Q3/Q4, as the Fed starts the taper dance, embarking on a pathway to eventually being able to raise rates.

So relatively speaking, even if the PBOC does nothing, there should be more accommodation on China’s monetary policy than the US into year end. This should be conducive for China equities, in particular the lagging tech names, bonds, and probably the domestic leisure and travel industry.

Explore Saxo’s products here

Disclaimer

Confidentiality and Usage:
You may not reproduce, distribute, or transmit this material or any portion thereof without prior written permission from Saxo.

Nature of Information:
The information provided herein is based on current market conditions and analysts' opinions, which may reflect personal views of the author, and are subject to change without notice. This material does not include a record of any trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, or endorsement to enter into any transaction in any investment product. Any forecast on the economy, markets and economic trends of the markets provided is not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of the investment product subject of this material.

Responsibility and Liability:
Saxo accepts no liability for any use that may be made of these comments or for any consequences that arise from such use. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

The information provided in this material is solely for information only. It is intended for general circulation and does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person. Accordingly, it should not be relied on or treated as a substitute for specific advice concerning specific situations of any person. Please seek advice from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of any investment product taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs before you make a commitment to purchase an investment product. In the event that you choose not to seek advice from a financial adviser, you should consider whether any investment product mentioned in this publication is suitable for you.

Notwithstanding the above, insofar as any information provided herein contains research analyses or reports concerning any investment product authored by any foreign research house and is issued or promulgated to a person in Singapore who is not an accredited investor, expert investor, and/or institutional investor, Saxo Capital Market Pte. Ltd. accepts legal responsibility for the contents of this material to the extent required by law. Recipients of such material are to contact Saxo Capital Markets Pte. Ltd. in respect of any matters arising from, or in connection with, this material.

Risk Disclosure:
Trading in investment products involve significant risk, including the risk of losing your entire investment. Historical returns are not a guarantee of future returns. Prices can both rise and fall, and there is a risk that you will not get back the money you invested.

Conflicts of interest:
The author may hold positions in the investment products mentioned. The author does not own positions in the underlying investment product exceeding 0.5% of its market capitalisation, save as otherwise declared. The author is not permitted to trade the mentioned investment products within the first 24 hours after the publication of this article.

Saxo maintains partnerships with companies that compensate Saxo for promotional activities conducted on its platform. Additionally, Saxo has agreements with certain partners who provide retrocession contingent upon clients purchasing specific investment products offered by these partners. While Saxo receives compensation from these partnerships, all content is conducted with the intention of providing clients with valuable options and information.

Publication details:
If any listed companies are the subject of the material, the content has not been submitted to the companies in question prior to publication.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.

Saxo Markets
88 Market Street
CapitaSpring #31-01
Singapore 048948

Contact Saxo

Singapore
Singapore

Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd ('Saxo Markets') is a company authorised and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) [Co. Reg. No.: 200601141M ] and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Saxo Bank A/S, headquartered in Denmark. Please refer to our General Business Terms & Risk Warning to consider whether acquiring or continuing to hold financial products is suitable for you, prior to opening an account and investing in a financial product.

Saxo is part of the J. Safra Sarasin Group.

Trading in financial instruments carries various risks, and is not suitable for all investors. Please seek expert advice, and always ensure that you fully understand these risks before trading. Trading in leveraged products such as Margin FX products may result in your losses exceeding your initial deposits. Saxo Markets does not provide financial advice, any information available on this website is ‘general’ in nature and for informational purposes only. Saxo Markets does not take into account an individual’s needs, objectives or financial situation.

The Saxo trading platform has received numerous awards and recognition. For details of these awards and information on awards visit www.home.saxo/en-sg/about-us/awards.

The information or the products and services referred to on this website may be accessed worldwide, however is only intended for distribution to and use by recipients located in countries where such use does not constitute a violation of applicable legislation or regulations. Products and Services offered on this website are not intended for residents of the United States, Malaysia and Japan. Please click here to view our full disclaimer.

This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc, registered in the US and other countries and regions. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.