Outrageous Predictions
A Fortune 500 company names an AI model as CEO
Charu Chanana
Chief Investment Strategist
Investment Strategist
Rheinmetall’s results were good and met high expectations, but the bigger story is its strong backlog and Europe’s longer defence build-out.
Ukraine remains the core driver, while the Middle East adds urgency to missiles, air defence and drones.
For investors, capacity, contract timing and supply chains now matter more than dramatic headlines.
In defence, headlines can arrive overnight. Factories cannot. That is the real message from Rheinmetall’s full-year results on 11 March 2026. The German group reported 2025 sales of 9.9 billion EUR, operating profit of 1.84 billion EUR, an 18.5% operating margin, and a record backlog of 63.8 billion EUR. It also guided for 2026 sales of 14.0 billion EUR to 14.5 billion EUR and an operating margin of about 19%. Strong numbers, yes. But the outlook still looked a touch light versus what the market had hoped for, which is a useful reminder that this sector now lives between geopolitical urgency and industrial reality.
Shares fell approximately 4% following the earnings miss, reflecting investor disappointment with the revenue and net profit shortfalls. The bigger point for long-term investors is that defence is no longer just a short burst trade on scary headlines. It is increasingly a multi-year manufacturing cycle, with winners decided by backlog quality, production capacity, export permissions, and who can actually ship on time.
Rheinmetall’s earnings matter because they show where the industry is moving next. The company is selling its civilian automotive activities and focusing fully on defence. It has also reshaped the business around vehicle systems, weapons and ammunition, air defence, digital systems, and naval systems. That is not window dressing. It reflects where Europe’s shopping list is going, from shells and armoured vehicles to air shields, software, and maritime security.
The backlog is the clearest sign that demand is real. At 63.8 billion EUR, it gives Rheinmetall years of work to convert into sales, and it suggests governments are not merely talking tough. Still, backlog is not revenue. In defence, money often moves like cold porridge. Political announcements come first, approvals come later, and factories get the memo last. That is why a strong order book can sit beside investor frustration about near-term guidance.
The broader defence story is now much bigger than one company. Reuters reported in January that European Union member states’ defence spending rose to 343 billion EUR in 2024 and likely reached 381 billion EUR in 2025. The European Commission’s ReArm Europe and Readiness 2030 plan aims to mobilise more than 800 billion EUR, while SAFE, short for Security Action for Europe, provides up to 150 billion EUR in loans for urgent procurement in areas such as ammunition, missiles, ground combat, drones, and air and missile defence. In plain English, Europe is trying to turn a security shock into a lasting industrial base.
Ukraine remains the main structural driver of that shift. But the recent Middle East escalation adds a second layer of urgency, especially for missiles, air defence systems, and drones. German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius warned on 6 March 2026 that Europe should not lose sight of Ukraine’s needs amid the Iran war, because global shortages of air defence systems are already tight. Rheinmetall then said on 6 March that the conflict with Iran validated its plans to expand missile production. That tells you where demand is moving fastest. It is not just about tanks rolling over fields. It is increasingly about interceptors, munitions, sensors, and the digital plumbing that connects them.
That wider opportunity does not mean every defence company rises in a neat straight line. Markets are starting to separate companies with visible conversion, capacity, and cash flow from those still wrestling with delays, approvals, or export noise. Renk is a good warning sign for the whole sector. Reuters reported on 5 March that around 200 million EUR of defence orders slipped into 2026 because customers pushed back programme timing, while German export restrictions on Israel also delayed some fourth-quarter deliveries. The issue was less about weak demand and more about the messy reality of defence procurement, where politics, permissions and paperwork can slow revenue even when the order book stays full.
Earlier in February, industry representatives told Reuters that Europe risked wasting time and money unless politicians gave clearer guidance on who should build what. This is the dull part of the story, but also the useful one. Ministers can announce rearmament in one afternoon. Building propellant plants, missile lines, trained workforces, and cross-border supply chains remains slower, more expensive, and much less photogenic.
The risks sit in three places. First, peace-talk headlines can still hit defence shares before budget reality changes. Reuters showed that in January when Ukraine negotiation hopes pushed the sector lower. Second, execution risk is rising because expectations are high and delivery bottlenecks are real. Third, policy can help and hinder at the same time, especially where export rules or “made in Europe” preferences start colliding with existing supply chains. Early warning signs are slower contract nominations, more delivery delays, weaker cash conversion, or fresh signs that governments are coordinating press conferences better than procurement plans.
Track backlog quality, not just backlog size. Funded programmes matter more than bold speeches.
Watch missiles, ammunition, electronics and drones. Those areas look most capacity constrained.
Separate conflict headlines from revenue timing. Orders, permits and factories still decide earnings.
Expect volatility around peace talks, export rules and guidance resets. Long cycles rarely move politely.
Rheinmetall’s earnings do not say the defence story is ending. They say it is growing up. The easy phase was buying the headline after every security shock. The harder phase is judging which companies can turn government urgency into steel, software, shells, and service contracts without tripping over permits, labour shortages, or procurement delays.
Ukraine still anchors Europe’s rearmament. The Middle East adds fresh demand for air defence, drones, and missiles. But for long-term investors, the better questions now live on the factory floor, not only on the map. In defence, the loudest story may start on the battlefield, but the lasting one is usually built on the production line.
This material is marketing content and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results.
The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options.