Tariff volatility is back: How traders are positioning across equities, FX, metals and futures

Key points:

• This is a tariff reset, not a tariff rollback: the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) route was struck down, but Trump replaced it with a temporary Section 122 tariff (first 10%, then 15%).
• Effective tariffs are likely lower than the headline suggests because carve-outs remain large (including USMCA-compliant goods and several product categories).
• Macro impact = slower growth + higher policy uncertainty + fiscal risk: tariff revenue uncertainty/refund risk can keep Treasury yields volatile and support gold/silver even on relief days.
• Winners are uneven: China/HK, Brazil and USMCA-linked trade could hold up relatively better; while Australia, parts of ASEAN, Japan and the UK lose relative advantage or could remain exposed.
• Market takeaway: expect more volatility and dispersion, with scope for US underperformance, stronger JPY/CHF, and persistent demand for precious metals.

What happened

• The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) struck down Trump’s broad tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) — a US law that gives the president emergency powers to regulate certain economic transactions during a declared national emergency. In this case, the court rejected its use as a broad legal route for sweeping tariffs.
• IEEPA tariff path is effectively curtailed, but tariffs are not “gone”: Trump immediately pivoted to Section 122 of the Trade Act as a temporary replacement path.
• Trump first announced a 10% global tariff, then quickly raised it to 15% (the Section 122 cap), with a 150-day window while country-specific replacements are pursued via other laws.
• Important nuance: exemptions/carve-outs remain significant (USMCA-compliant goods, some electronics, pharmaceuticals, critical minerals, certain agriculture, products already under sectoral tariffs, aircraft carve-outs in some cases).



---

What are the macro implications?

Big picture

• This is a policy reset, not a clean rollback. Legal flexibility is reduced, but tariff pressure continues via more bureaucratic channels.
• Effective tariff rate likely sits below the pre-ruling IEEPA setup (despite the 15% headline), because carve-outs are large.
• Growth drag could remain (trade friction, supply-chain uncertainty, delayed capex) but is likely less severe than feared under the prior IEEPA mix.
• Policy uncertainty is expected to stay high (temporary Section 122 + likely Section 301/232 investigations) could mean more volatility and more sector/country dispersion.

Fiscal / rates implications

• Tariff revenue uncertainty rises (legal challenges/refunds + changing tariff architecture).
• US fiscal risk can rise if markets focus on lower/uncertain tariff revenue and wider deficits.

Country / regional winners vs losers

Relative winners (relief from prior IEEPA burden)

• China / HK: meaningful relief vs prior layering; electronics carve-outs help.
• Brazil: among the larger average tariff-rate beneficiaries in the reset.
• Mexico / Canada (USMCA-compliant goods): remain in a favorable position due to exemptions.
• India / Indonesia: some relief, though less dramatic than China/Brazil.
• Taiwan / Switzerland / Saudi Arabia (selected exports): benefit where key exports remain in carve-out buckets (chips, pharma/gold, oil).

Relative losers / loss of competitive advantage

• Australia (and some low-rate partners): may not be outright “losers,” but lose prior relative tariff advantage.
• Vietnam / some ASEAN exporters: could lose some market-share advantage if China regains competitiveness in categories previously burdened.
• EU / Japan / UK: outcome depends on treatment of existing deal caps/carve-outs; some may face relatively higher rates under a 15% flat structure if caps are not preserved.

What does it mean for markets?

Market regime

• More volatility, more dispersion (policy path is less predictable, more headline-driven).
• Country dispersion > sector-only dispersion (high-tariff losers rebound; former relative winners lose edge).
• Two-way risk-on / risk-off is likely to persist.

Directional tilt

• US assets can underperform initially on fiscal + policy credibility concerns (even if broad indices bounce on relief).
• USD may soften if flows rotate away from US assets / policy credibility premium compresses.
• Asia (especially HK/China) could outperform on tariff-relief catch-up.
• JPY and CHF are likely to gain on risk-off flows if fiscal/rates uncertainty dominates.
• Gold and silver could potentially gain on fiscal risk + policy uncertainty, even if equities are up.
• Flows out of US / diversification bids can support select ex-US equities and precious metals.

Playbook for traders

Below are some examples of how some traders may express their views on the US court tariff ruling. These examples are for illustration only and do not constitute investment advice.

1) CFDs

Core index CFD ideas

• Short US 500 or US Tech 100 NAS (Policy uncertainty + growth concerns + fiscal risks)
• Long Hong Kong 50 (China/HK relief catch-up)
• Short EU Stock 50 (Europe gets some tariff relief, but the move can lag/roll over if exporters remain under pressure and a 15% flat-tariff framework still erodes competitiveness for parts of the region)
• Short Australia 200 or Germany 40 (Export relief is less pronounced than others and 15% tariff threat can mean higher effective tariff rate vs. pre-ruling)

ETF CFDs

• Long GLD or SLV / Short SPY: gold or silver vs US equities (fiscal-risk + policy-uncertainty hedge)

• Long EWZ (Brazil ETF CFD) / Short SPY: Brazil relief winner vs US policy/fiscal uncertainty
• Long EWH (Hong Kong ETF CFD) / Short SPY: HK relief vs US underperformance
• Long EWY (South Korea ETF CFD) / Short SPY: Risk sentiment boost, softer USD and lower trade barriers could push Korea’s outperformance higher


CFD Futures

• Short US Dollar Index futures CFD (fiscal risks weigh on USD more than risk aversion can help)
• Long Gold or Silver futures CFD (fiscal risk + policy uncertainty can keep demand for precious metals strong even on tariff-relief headlines)
• Short Japan 225 (Japan’s tariff relief is not substantial relative to bigger beneficiaries like China/Brazil, and JPY strength can still weigh on exporters — matching today’s weaker tape)
• Short UK 100 (the UK sees little/no effective tariff relief if the flat rate is 10%, and could face a higher effective tariff rate if it shifts to 15%; add global risk uncertainty and UK100’s cyclical/commodity sensitivity)

 

2) FX

Safe-haven + fiscal-risk expressions

• Short USD/JPY or USD/CHF
• Long XAU/USD, XAG/USD, XPT/USD or XPD/USD (Gold, silver, platinum and palladium gain on weaker USD and as fiscal risk hedge)

 

Risk / relative growth expressions

• Short AUD/USD (Australia loses some relative tariff edge; China relief may not automatically help AUD if USD and risk dynamics dominate)
• Short AUD/JPY (clean risk-off / uncertainty expression)
• Long MXN vs USD (e.g., short USD/MXN) on USMCA exemption support

 

Europe / flow diversification expressions

• Long EUR/USD (if USD softens on policy/fiscal credibility concerns)
• Short EUR/CHF (on risk off flows vs minimal tariff advantage to EU)
• USD/CAD: two-way (USMCA support for CAD vs commodity/risk swings)

 

3) Futures

Precious metals futures

• Gold, Micro Gold: could be bullish on fiscal risk + policy uncertainty
• Silver, Micro Silver: could be bullish, higher beta / more volatile

 

Regional / FX-linked futures

• BRLUSD futures: could be bullish BRL on Brazil relief winner narrative
• Japan 225 futures: could be bearish / under pressure when JPY strengthens

---

Risks to the view

• Trump’s tariff path can shift again (10% to 15% move already showed headline risk).
• Section 301/232 investigations can reverse country winners/losers quickly.
• Treasury/yield moves can scramble the usual FX and equity correlations.
• China/HK relief rallies can be sharp but fragile if policy clarity fades.

Key takeaway

Focus on dispersion, not slogans: this looks less like “tariffs are over” and more like “effective tariffs may be lower than feared, but policy uncertainty and fiscal noise remain high.” That mix can keep outcomes uneven across regions and assets, potentially favouring some tariff-sensitive Asian markets and parts of LatAm, while keeping the JPY/CHF bid on risk-off days and sustaining interest in precious metals.

Disclaimer: FX and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 61% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading FX and CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how FX and CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.