Credit Impulse Update: France’s best days are already behind us

French Election Update : A replay of 2017

Macro
Picture of Christopher Dembik
Christopher Dembik

Head of Macroeconomic Research

Summary:  We see a 80% chance that President Emmanuel Macron will be re-elected against far-right Marine Le Pen. Macron’s expected victory should not be considered as the triumph of reformism but instead as the symbol of a severe crisis of French democracy. This would be the fourth time in twenty years that the French use their vote to vote against someone and not for someone at the presidential election (Chirac-Le Pen 2002, Sarkozy-Hollande 2012, Macron-Le Pen 2017). Expect Macron to face a lot of opposition to his reforms in his second term. No matter how large his majority will be at the National Assembly, he will be a lame duck.


The message of the polls : All recent polls show Macron is well ahead of the pack in the first round (~30% compared with ~26-27% a month ago). The recent increase is mostly explained by the « rally around the flag » effect due to the Ukraine war. Macron is considered as the most competent to deal with the situation by a majority of voters. The far-right candidate Marine Le Pen is still in the second position (~17-18%). But she is slightly lower than in the previous polls, perhaps due to her loud Putin sympathies in the past. The fight for the third position continues between the center-right Les Républicains Valérie Pécresse and the extreme-left Jean-Luc Mélenchon (who was the third man of the 2017 French presidential election). Both are at 13% in the latest OpinionWay poll released today. The former TV pundit Eric Zemmour is losing momentum. He is now ~10%. This is partially explained by his extremist positions on Islam which antagonize a majority of voters and his previous admiration for Putin’s regime. In many respects, he appears much more radical than Le Pen on several issues, including immigration. While most voters worry about inflation and the economy, Zemmour only talks about immigration. This is a mistake. With the exception of Mélenchon, all the other left candidates are below 5%. Voters are skeptical about the exit of nuclear power – which is at the core of the Greens’ economic platform. They understand quite well it will lead to higher energy prices. A few months ago, the Greens were ~10% of voting intentions in the first round. The socialist candidate and current mayor of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, is ~1-2%. The Socialist Party has not worked seriously over the past five years to propose a credible economic platform and its candidate is considered as one of the most unfit candidates for the job, even among socialist supporters. This election will certainly mark the end of the Socialist Party in France and the continuation of the profound political reconfiguration of the Left and the Right, which has started since 2017. If the center-right Pécresse is not qualified for the second round, expect a profound crisis of the Les Républicains, similar to what has happened to the Socialist Party in 2017.

Le Pen’s new consensual economic program : Last week, Le Pen gave a four-hour long TV interview to the French TV show ‘Face à Baba’ – a very popular program mostly watched by young people. She appeared better prepared, including on economic topics, more moderate and calmer than during the final debate of the 2017 presidential election when she lost the argument against Macron. She debated against several opponents and experts, including myself. Her overall performance was good and, sometimes, even impressive. Her main slogan is to « Give the French their money back ». She proposed several tax cuts : VAT cut from 20% to 5.5% on energy and abolition of income tax for people below 30, for instance. This is consensual and would make sense. She also proposes a national loan with a nominal 2% annual interest (known as ‘grand emprunt’) to invest into new technologies. This is the only economic proposal which is an economic nonsense in her platform, in our view. Why would France borrow at 2% from its citizens while it can borrow very large amounts in financial markets at very low cost, close to 0% over a ten-year period ? This measure would be very costly for the country’s public finances.

Macron’s right-wing economic platform : Last week, Macron proposed a major reform of inheritance rights and to raise the retirement age to 65 instead of 62, if he is re-elected. This aims to attract right-wing voters. Compared with other European countries, tax on inheritance is very high in France. This is a sensitive issue for voters. Macron wants to increase the allowance on direct line inheritance from 100,000 euros to 150,000 euros. In addition, the regime of heirs in direct line to the children of the spouses would be extended. In many other countries, inheritance tax has been abolished : in Sweden (2004), Slovakia (2004), Austria (2008) and the Czech Republic (2014). In Poland and Portugal, spouses and direct descendants (which includes both parents and children) are exempt from inheritance tax, for instance. There is still a long road ahead for France to lower taxation. We see a 80% chance that Macron will be re-elected against Le Pen. But he is seen as a ‘default choice’ by a majority of voters. This means he will certainly face much more opposition to his reforms and more violent street protests than in the past. We doubt he will be able to raise the retirement age, for instance. No matter how large his majority will be at the National Assembly, he will be a lame duck.

What to watch now : There is no debate with all the candidates before the first round of 10 April since Macron refused to participate. We will therefore focus mostly on polls in the coming three weeks.

The message of the polls : All recent polls show Macron is well ahead of the pack in the first round (~30% compared with ~26-27% a month ago). The recent increase is mostly explained by the « rally around the flag » effect due to the Ukraine war. Macron is considered as the most competent to deal with the situation by a majority of voters. The far-right candidate Marine Le Pen is still in the second position (~17-18%). But she is slightly lower than in the previous polls, perhaps due to her loud Putin sympathies in the past. The fight for the third position continues between the center-right Les Républicains Valérie Pécresse and the extreme-left Jean-Luc Mélenchon (who was the third man of the 2017 French presidential election). Both are at 13% in the latest OpinionWay poll released today. The former TV pundit Eric Zemmour is losing momentum. He is now ~10%. This is partially explained by his extremist positions on Islam which antagonize a majority of voters and his previous admiration for Putin’s regime. In many respects, he appears much more radical than Le Pen on several issues, including immigration. While most voters worry about inflation and the economy, Zemmour only talks about immigration. This is a mistake. With the exception of Mélenchon, all the other left candidates are below 5%. Voters are skeptical about the exit of nuclear power – which is at the core of the Greens’ economic platform. They understand quite well it will lead to higher energy prices. A few months ago, the Greens were ~10% of voting intentions in the first round. The socialist candidate and current mayor of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, is ~1-2%. The Socialist Party has not worked seriously over the past five years to propose a credible economic platform and its candidate is considered as one of the most uncompetent candidates, even among socialist supporters. This election will certainly mark the end of the Socialist Party in France and the continuation of the profound political recomposition of the Left and the Right, which has started since 2017. If the center-right Pécresse is not qualified for the second round, expect a profound crisis of the Les Républicains, similar to what has happened to the Socialist Party in 2017.

Le Pen’s new consensual economic program : Last week, Le Pen gave a four-hour long TV interview to the French TV show ‘Face à Baba’ – a very popular program mostly watched by young people. She appeared better prepared, including on economic topics, more moderate and calmer than during the final debate of the 2017 presidential election when she lost the argument against Macron. She debated against several opponents and experts, including myself. Her overall performance was good and, sometimes, even impressive. Her main slogan is to « Give the French their money back ». She proposed several tax cuts : VAT cut from 20% to 5.5% on energy and abolition of income tax for people below 30, for instance. This is consensual and would make sense. She also proposes a national loan with a nominal 2% annual interest (known as ‘grand emprunt’) to invest into new technologies. This is the only economic proposal which is an economic nonsense in her platform, in our view. Why would France borrow at 2% from its citizens while it can borrow very large amounts in financial markets at very low cost, close to 0% over a ten-year period ? This measure would be very costly for the country’s public finances.

Macron’s right-wing economic platform : Last week, Macron proposed a major reform of inheritance rights and to raise the retirement age to 65 instead of 62, if he is re-elected. This aims to attract right-wing voters. Compared with other European countries, tax on inheritance is very high in France. This is a sensitive issue for voters. Macron wants to increase the allowance on direct line inheritance from 100,000 euros to 150,000 euros. In addition, the regime of heirs in direct line to the children of the spouses would be extended. In many other countries, inheritance tax has been abolished : in Sweden (2004), Slovakia (2004), Austria (2008) and the Czech Republic (2014). In Poland and Portugal, spouses and direct descendants (which includes both parents and children) are exempt from inheritance tax, for instance. There is still a long road ahead for France to lower taxation. We see an 80% chance that Macron will be re-elected against Le Pen. But he is seen as a ‘default choice’ by a majority of voters. This means he will certainly face much more opposition to his reforms and more violent street protests than in the past. We doubt he will be able to raise the retirement age, for instance. No matter how large his majority is at the National Assembly, he will be a lame duck.

What to watch now : There is no debate with all the candidates before the first round of 10 April since Macron refused to participate. We will therefore focus mostly on polls in the coming three weeks.

21_CDK_1

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Upending the global order at blinding speed

    Quarterly Outlook

    Upending the global order at blinding speed

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ...
  • Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Quarterly Outlook

    Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Quarterly Outlook

    China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    Quarterly Outlook

    FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Quarterly Outlook

    Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Althea Spinozzi

    Head of Fixed Income Strategy

Content disclaimer

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15
2900
Hellerup
Denmark

Contact Saxo

Select region

International
International

All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.