Outrageous Predictions
Des médicaments contre l’obésité pour tous – même pour les animaux de compagnie
Jacob Falkencrone
Global Head of Investment Strategy
Investment and Options Strategist
Résumé: With Intel’s earnings approaching, the options market is already pricing a meaningful post-event move. This scorecard shows how to interpret that pricing, map it to key levels, and assess risk across options, charts, and fundamentals.
This article uses a scorecard approach to analyse Intel’s upcoming earnings. Instead of focusing on predictions, the scorecard organises the most relevant pre‑event information into four complementary lenses: options metrics (what the market is pricing), options flow (how traders are positioned), technical analysis (where price reactions are most likely to matter), and fundamental or news context (what the market will listen for). The purpose is to create a clear, consistent framework for assessing risk around the event, not to forecast the outcome.
At the time of writing, Intel trades around 46.96. The options market implies a move of roughly ±7.5% into the first expiry after earnings, which translates into a range of about 43.4 to 50.5. That range neatly overlaps with obvious chart levels, which makes this a good case study in how earnings pricing, technical context, and risk management come together.
The most important piece of information ahead of earnings is the implied move. It is not a forecast, but a translation of option prices into a range the market is willing to pay for protection against.
In Intel’s case, that range is wide. Front-week implied volatility is elevated relative to the following month, a classic sign that the earnings event itself carries most of the uncertainty. This has two immediate implications. First, trades that use the event-week expiry will be very sensitive to both the overnight gap and the post-earnings volatility drop. Second, trades using the February expiry still reflect earnings risk, but with more time for any follow-through or mean reversion to play out.
Recent option flow adds colour but not a clean signal. Premium has been concentrated more in February and March expiries than in the event week itself, and while call premium has dominated overall, much of it traded at mid prices. In practical terms, this suggests positioning that extends beyond the earnings day, rather than a one-sided, all-in bet on the immediate reaction.
From a chart perspective, Intel remains in an uptrend, trading above its medium- and long-term averages. Momentum has cooled from recent highs, but has not decisively broken down.
The levels that matter are straightforward. On the downside, the 44–45 area marks the first zone where a pullback would still be consistent with a constructive trend. Below that, the risk of a deeper reset increases. On the upside, the 50–51 area marks recent highs and a clear supply zone.
Overlaying the implied earnings range onto this map is instructive. The market is effectively pricing a move that could test either of these areas. That alignment makes this less about hidden technical levels and more about how the stock behaves if it reaches them.
Earnings reactions are often driven less by the headline numbers than by how management frames the road ahead. For this release, the market’s sensitivity is likely to centre on three themes.
The key point for options traders is that being “right” on the quarter does not guarantee a favourable price reaction if the forward narrative is repriced.
Important note: The strategies and examples provided in this article are purely for educational purposes. They are intended to assist in shaping your thought process and should not be replicated or implemented without careful consideration. Every investor or trader must conduct their own due diligence and take into account their unique financial situation, risk tolerance, and investment objectives before making any decisions. Remember, investing in the stock market carries risk, and it's crucial to make informed decisions.
One way to approach this setup before earnings is with defined-risk premium selling, such as an iron condor placed inside the implied range. The thesis is not that the stock will not move, but that it will move less than priced. Risk must be strictly capped, and position size kept modest, because gaps can jump beyond expected ranges.
For traders with a directional view, defined-risk spreads offer a cleaner expression than outright long options. Using the event-week expiry creates a purer earnings bet, but comes with sharper volatility risk. Using the February expiry costs more, but allows time for a second-stage move after the initial reaction.
A third approach is to wait for the earnings reaction and trade the follow-through. Entering a February spread only after price acceptance above 50–51 or failure below 44–45 avoids paying peak event premium, at the cost of potentially missing the first part of the move – but it does come with one guaranteed benefit: a better chance of a good night’s sleep while the earnings numbers hit the tape.
Earnings trades are high-variance by nature. Liquidity can deteriorate around the open, spreads can widen, and implied volatility can change unevenly across strikes. Any short option position carries assignment risk, particularly when options move in-the-money overnight. Defined-risk structures help cap losses, but they do not eliminate slippage or execution risk.
Position sizing matters more than structure choice. A single earnings gap should never be able to dictate portfolio outcomes.
Intel’s upcoming earnings are a good example of a priced event. Options already reflect a wide range, and that range maps cleanly onto visible chart levels. For active investors, the edge is less about predicting direction and more about choosing whether to fade or follow the priced move, selecting the right expiry, and keeping risk tightly defined.
The table below consolidates the key quantitative inputs behind the article. It is intended as a practical reference layer for traders who want to see the numbers that support the narrative and scenario framework above.
| Dimension | Metric | Value | How to use it |
| Event | Earnings timing | After market close, 22 jan 2026 | Overnight gap risk applies; first reaction visible in the 23 jan expiry. |
| Spot / reference | Spot price (as of analysis) | 46.96 | Anchor for implied range, strike selection, and payoff assessment. |
| Options metrics | Implied move (event week) | ±7.5% (±3.52) | Benchmark for judging whether the realised move is larger or smaller than priced. |
| Implied range | ~43.4 to ~50.5 | Defines the zone where premium-selling structures are most sensitive. | |
| Volatility term structure | Front-week IV elevated vs February | Indicates earnings risk is concentrated in the nearest expiry; post-event IV crush likely. | |
| Options flow | Aggregate premium bias (10 sessions) | Call-heavy, but mixed execution | Directional conviction is not clean; treat flow as context, not a signal. |
| Expiry concentration | February/March > event week | Suggests positioning beyond the one-day earnings reaction. | |
| Technical analysis | Primary support zone | 44–45 | Area to monitor for downside acceptance or failure after earnings. |
| Primary resistance zone | 50–51 | Area where upside reactions may stall or accelerate if cleared. | |
| Trend regime | Uptrend (above medium- and long-term averages) | Bias for interpreting reactions: pullbacks vs trend breaks. | |
| Fundamentals / news | Key narrative focus | Forward guidance | Often more influential than the reported quarter itself. |
| Secondary focus | Demand and margin commentary | Can shift near-term earnings expectations quickly. | |
| Structural focus | Execution credibility | Influences whether reactions fade or develop into trends. |
| More from the author |
|---|
Trump’s tariff threats over Greenland push hard assets back to centre stage