Investment Strategist
Hermès grows faster than expected, showing the ultra-wealthy still spend through a softer luxury cycle.
Leather goods lead again, while perfume and beauty remind investors that even strong brands have weaker corners.
The luxury revival looks real at the top-end, but it remains uneven across the wider fashion ecosystem.
Luxury has had a difficult few years. Not because people stopped liking nice things, but because the industry pushed prices hard, demand cooled, and “aspirational” shoppers stepped back.
Recently, we discussed a soft revival sparked by better-than-feared signals from Kering and a confident tone from Ferrari. Today, Hermès adds a different kind of evidence. It is not flashy. It is steady, controlled, and built around one powerful word: scarcity.
Hermès reports fourth-quarter sales growth of 9.8% at constant exchange rates. That phrase matters. It means the company strips out currency moves, so you can see the underlying demand more clearly. Bloomberg consensus expects 8.24%, so Hermès beats by being a little better than “already pretty good”.
The mix tells the real story. Leather goods and saddlery, the engine room of the brand, grows 14.6% at constant exchange rates versus expectations of 12.6%. Ready-to-wear and fashion grows 7.1% versus 5.81%. Watches are positive too, at 3.2%, when expectations point slightly negative.
Not everything shines. Perfume and beauty sales fall 14.6% at constant exchange rates, worse than the expected 8.85% decline. That matters for investor expectations, because it shows that even Hermès cannot escape all category-level pressures.
For the full year, recurring operating income beats expectations and the recurring operating margin lands around 41%, ahead of the 39.9% estimate. This is why the market often treats Hermès less like “luxury retail” and more like a pricing-and-discipline machine.
Hermès sells demand management as a product feature. Many people want the bags, few people can buy them quickly, and the waiting list becomes part of the story. That does two useful things during a slowdown.
First, it protects pricing power. Hermès says it raises prices by 5% to 6% on average so far in 2026. Many peers have slowed price increases because demand looks more sensitive. Hermès can still push price without chasing volume, because supply stays tight and the customer base sits at the top end of wealth.
Second, it reduces the need for discounting. Discounting is the fastest way to turn a luxury brand into a normal retailer. Investors watch for it because once the habit starts, it is hard to stop without damaging brand heat. Hermès avoids that trap by design.
Hermès does not prove that luxury is back everywhere. It does help answer a narrower question: does the very top end still look resilient while the rest of the sector resets?
That echoes what we noted with Ferrari. Ferrari’s strength tends to come from controlled supply, long order books, and customers who buy with passion rather than promotions. Hermès sits in a similar place. The product is physical, the supply is constrained, and the customer is less likely to change behaviour because groceries cost more.
The tricky part is what investors do with that information. If you own a basket of luxury names, the performance can still disappoint even when the best operators deliver. A “two-speed” market means strong brands can keep growing, while fashion-led names that rely on broader middle-to-upper income demand may need more time to recover.
Hermès also highlights a second reality: the sector does not move in a straight line. Even as Hermès beats expectations, some peers still sound cautious about 2026. That keeps the revival as a question, not a declaration.
The first risk is valuation and expectations. Hermès often trades as the “quality winner” of the sector, which means it has less room for error if growth slows. A small disappointment can have an outsized share-price impact when perfection feels priced in.
The second risk is category spillover. Perfume and beauty already underperform in this quarter. If that weakness spreads into other lines, it would be an early signal that even high-end demand is normalising.
The third risk is currency and geopolitics. Hermès notes currency swings can be a meaningful headwind. If foreign exchange moves or travel patterns shift, reported growth can look weaker even when underlying demand is fine.
If leather goods growth stays well ahead of the group, it signals demand quality remains strong.
If price rises continue without a volume hit, it supports the “top-end resilience” thesis.
If promotions or inventory build-ups spread across the sector, assume the recovery stays uneven.
If leadership talk turns from “confident” to “cautious”, treat it as an early warning, not a late headline.
Luxury’s weak patch has trained investors to look for drama. Hermès offers the opposite: a business that wins by keeping the rules boring and the waiting lists long. The quarter beats expectations, leather goods lead again, and price discipline remains intact. That supports the idea that the soft revival may start at the very top end, where scarcity and brand control matter more than the economic mood.
Still, this is not a sector-wide victory lap. Perfume and beauty show cracks, peers remain cautious, and the rebound stays uneven. The neat takeaway is simple: in luxury, the discount rack tells you more than the catwalk.
Outrageous Predictions
Chief Investment Strategist
Outrageous Predictions
Chief Investment Strategist
Outrageous Predictions
Global Head of Investment Strategy
Outrageous Predictions
Investor Content Strategist
Outrageous Predictions
Global Head of Macro Strategy
Outrageous Predictions
Global Head of Macro Strategy
Outrageous Predictions
Saxo Group
Outrageous Predictions
Global Head of Macro Strategy
Outrageous Predictions
Global Head of Investment Strategy
Outrageous Predictions
Chief Investment Strategist