IranEVHeader

Petrol shock, electric dreams: why the Iran war helps EV logic but not every EV stock

Equities 5 minutes to read
Ruben Dalfovo
Ruben Dalfovo

Investment Strategist

Key takeaways

  • This is an oil and inflation shock first, and an EV story second.

  • Higher fuel costs improve the case for EVs, but they do not solve weak demand or expensive valuations.

  • Renewables, storage and charging may be quieter long-run beneficiaries than any single car stock.


Petrol price signs have a habit of turning geopolitics into a household budget problem. That is why the Iran war matters for electric vehicles, or EVs. On 9 March 2026, Brent crude settled at 98.96 USD a barrel, up 6.8%, after hitting 119.50 USD intraday. Bloomberg Intelligence notes that the Strait of Hormuz normally carries about 20 million barrels a day, roughly one-fifth of global petroleum liquids consumption. That makes this an oil shock first, then an inflation and rates story, and only after that an EV story.

Higher fuel prices make the running-cost case for electric driving easier to see, but they do not create demand from scratch. That shift is already underway. The logic also goes beyond cars. Costly oil makes renewables, batteries and charging networks look more valuable too, turning electrification from a climate ambition into a form of economic protection.

Tesla is the headline, but not the whole story

Markets still default to Tesla when they want to make a quick call on the EV theme. It remains the sector’s loudest symbol, the stock that often carries the hopes, fears and mood swings of the wider electric vehicle market. But the real story is broader now. BYD brings scale, Li Auto brings execution, Xiaomi brings fresh momentum, and each reflects a different part of where electrification is heading. For investors, that matters. This is no longer a one-company narrative. It is an ecosystem story, with several contenders, very different business models, and a market that still struggles to separate excitement from durable profits.

According to our internal analysis using Bloomberg data, only four EV groups were operating at a profit in 2024: Tesla, BYD, Li Auto and Xiaomi. Xiaomi deserves a footnote, not because it is unimportant, but because it is different. Xiaomi is a broader technology group with a separate Smart EV segment, so it does not fit neatly into the same pure-play table. At Xiaomi’s investor day in June 2025, founder Lei Jun said the company’s EV business was expected to turn profitable in the second half of 2025.

ev-chart-finalRIGHT
Source: Bloomberg, Company reports, Saxo Bank analysis.

That is also why this is not a clean “Tesla wins” trade. Tesla showed some stabilisation in parts of Europe in February after two years of falling sales, but stabilisation is not the same as escape velocity. BYD, meanwhile, has kept pushing technology, unveiling a faster-charging Blade Battery on 5 March 2026, even as analysts worry about weak demand and brutal competition in China. Higher oil can improve the story around EV adoption, while higher rates and weaker consumers make the stocks harder to own. Markets can hold two awkward thoughts at once.

The second punch is logistics

There is another reason this theme is broader than a showroom story. Reuters reports that China, India, Japan and South Korea all export large volumes of vehicles to the Middle East, and that Toyota may cut nearly 40,000 units of output for that region because of logistics concerns. If the Strait stays disrupted, shipping delays, insurance costs and rerouting charges can hit both combustion and electric models. A dearer tank of fuel may help EV demand, but a more expensive and chaotic supply chain can still hurt margins.

That matters for investors because the best question is not “which EV stock wins tomorrow?” The better question is which companies can absorb higher freight bills, slower consumer confidence and more expensive financing without breaking their long-term plan. Reuters has already reported record tanker costs in the region, while investors have started to price a new inflation scare into bond markets. If oil stays high for weeks rather than days, the pressure shifts from headlines to household budgets and corporate margins.

Risks worth watching

The bullish EV read-through can fail in three simple ways. First, the oil spike may fade before it changes real buying behaviour. One ugly week at the pump rarely sends families out to replace a car. Second, if higher energy prices delay rate cuts, car finance gets less friendly and high-valuation growth stocks can wobble even if the product story improves.

Lastly, logistics can become the main problem. If tanker traffic, insurance premiums and parts flows remain strained, some automakers may discover that better demand maths still does not fix delayed deliveries. Early warning signs are straightforward: Brent staying near or above 100 USD, bond yields moving higher, and monthly EV registration data failing to improve.

Investor playbook

  • If oil cools quickly, treat this as a sentiment shock, not a demand revolution.

  • If oil stays high, favour scale, cash and pricing power over pure narrative.

  • Separate the EV product story from the EV stock story. They are cousins, not twins.

  • Watch charging, grids and storage as part of the same electrification chain.

The whole system matters

A painful forecourt sign can make electric driving easier to sell, but it does not make EV investing easier. The Iran war strengthens the long-term case for electrification because every fuel shock reminds consumers and governments what dependence on oil looks like in real time. But the same shock can also raise inflation fears, push rates higher and tangle supply chains.

Tesla remains the headline name, yet the more useful lens is wider: BYD, Li Auto, Xiaomi’s emerging auto arm, charging networks, batteries, and the renewables and storage build-out behind them. When petrol gets expensive, the smartest investors do not just look at the car.
They look at the whole system.








This material is marketing content and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results.

The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options.

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Q1 Outlook for Traders: Five Big Questions and Three Grey Swans.

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q1 Outlook for Traders: Five Big Questions and Three Grey Swans.

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    Strap yourself in for key market questions that must be answered in 2026.
  • Q1 Outlook for Investors: “AI” party hangover needs discipline and diversification

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q1 Outlook for Investors: “AI” party hangover needs discipline and diversification

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

    2026 is a high-valuation, high-dispersion year: the AI story matures, policy becomes less predictabl...
  • Q4 Outlook for Investors: Diversify like it’s 2025 – don’t fall for déjà vu

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q4 Outlook for Investors: Diversify like it’s 2025 – don’t fall for déjà vu

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Q4 Outlook for Traders: The Fed is back in easing mode. Is this time different?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q4 Outlook for Traders: The Fed is back in easing mode. Is this time different?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    The Fed launched a new easing cycle in late Q3. Will this cycle now play out like 2000 or 2007?
  • Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    After the chaos of Q2, the quarter ahead should get a bit more clarity on how Trump 2.0 is impacting...
  • Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Upending the global order at blinding speed

    Quarterly Outlook

    Upending the global order at blinding speed

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ...
  • Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Quarterly Outlook

    Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

Disclaimer

The Saxo Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-hk/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)

None of the information contained here constitutes an offer to purchase or sell a financial instrument, or to make any investments. Saxo does not take into account your personal investment objectives or financial situation and makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the information nor for any loss arising from any investment made in reliance of this presentation. Any opinions made are subject to change and may be personal to the author. These may not necessarily reflect the opinion of Saxo or its affiliates.


Hong Kong

Contact Saxo

Hong Kong S.A.R
Hong Kong S.A.R

Saxo Capital Markets HK Limited (“Saxo”) is a company authorised and regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong. Saxo holds a Type 1 Regulated Activity (Dealing in Securities); Type 2 Regulated Activity (Dealing in Futures Contract); Type 3 Regulated Activity (Leveraged Foreign Exchange Trading); Type 4 Regulated Activity (Advising on Securities) and Type 9 Regulated Activity (Asset Management) licenses (CE No. AVD061). Registered address: 19th Floor, Shanghai Commercial Bank Tower, 12 Queen’s Road Central, Hong Kong.

Trading in financial instruments carries various risks, and is not suitable for all investors. Please seek expert advice, and always ensure that you fully understand these risks before trading. Trading in leveraged products may result in your losses exceeding your initial deposits. Saxo does not provide financial advice, any information available on this website is ‘general’ in nature and for informational purposes only. Saxo does not take into account an individual’s needs, objectives or financial situation. Please click here to view the relevant risk disclosure statements.

The Saxo trading platform has received numerous awards and recognition. For details of these awards and information on awards visit www.home.saxo/en-hk/about-us/awards.

The information or the products and services referred to on this site may be accessed worldwide, however is only intended for distribution to and use by recipients located in countries where such use does not constitute a violation of applicable legislation or regulations. Products and services offered on this website are not directed at, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity residing in the United States and Japan. Please click here to view our full disclaimer.

Apple, iPad and iPhone are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. AppStore is a service mark of Apple Inc. Android is a trademark of Google Inc.