Investment and Options Strategist
Summary: Tesla’s recent volatility presents both risks and opportunities for investors. This article explores how Tesla shareholders can optimize yields or defend against losses using a covered strangle strategy, leveraging elevated options premiums to enhance returns while managing downside exposure.
This article explores how existing Tesla shareholders can optimize their yields or defend against losses using a covered strangle strategy. How existing Tesla shareholders can optimize their yields or defend against losses by employing a covered strangle strategy. Tesla (TSLA) presents an ideal case study for showcasing this approach, given its recent volatility and elevated options premiums.
Tesla (TSLA) has been under pressure following its latest earnings report, with the stock correcting significantly. The latest chart shows TSLA trading at $335.16, having recently dipped below its 50-day moving average (401.71) but still above the 200-day moving average (270.49). With implied volatility (IV) at 54.68% and an IV Rank of 39.01%, options premiums remain attractive, presenting an opportunity for investors to enhance their returns or regain some losses.
For investors who already own Tesla shares and remain moderately bullish, a covered strangle strategy offers a way to generate additional income while providing a built-in downside cushion.
Important note: The strategies and examples provided in this article are purely for educational purposes. They are intended to assist in shaping your thought process and should not be replicated or implemented without careful consideration. Every investor or trader must conduct their own due diligence and take into account their unique financial situation, risk tolerance, and investment objectives before making any decisions. Remember, investing in the stock market carries risk, and it's crucial to make informed decisions.
The covered strangle is a combination of a covered call and a short put. This strategy requires investors to already own TSLA shares, as the covered call component ensures the position remains protected to the upside. and want to generate premium income while being open to acquiring more shares at a discount.
Sell the 390 call (March 21, 2025) → Generates premium while capping upside beyond $390.
Sell the 280 put (March 21, 2025) → Obligates the investor to buy more TSLA shares at $280 if assigned.
Total premium received: $11.80 per share (~3.5% yield in 37 days).
If TSLA stays between $280 and $390, the investor keeps the full premium, achieving a 3.5% return in just over a month. However, there are also risks to consider. If TSLA drops below $280 at expiration, the investor is obligated to buy additional shares, effectively lowering their average cost to $268.20 per share, but exposing them to potential further downside. If TSLA rises above $390 at expiration, they sell their shares at that level, securing a profit but limiting any further upside participation.
Tesla’s implied volatility (54.68%) remains elevated compared to historical norms, with an IV Rank of 39.01%, making it easier to gauge relative premium richness. This means options premiums are still high, making premium-selling strategies attractive. By utilizing a covered strangle, investors can capitalize on high option prices to enhance their returns while managing downside exposure.
For investors considering other approaches, two additional strategies provide different risk-reward profiles:
Bullish: Selling a Cash-Secured Put – Instead of a full strangle, investors could sell a 280-strike put, generating premium while being open to acquiring shares at a discount. This approach is particularly attractive in the current environment due to elevated premiums. However, once implied volatility declines and premiums become less favorable, an alternative would be to buy a long-term call option (LEAP). A cheaper call option with an extended expiration could allow investors to maintain upside exposure with limited capital at risk.
Bearish: Buying a Put or Selling a Call Spread – Investors who are bearish on Tesla could buy a put option, though premiums are relatively high. This would allow them to profit from a decline while keeping downside exposure limited. Alternatively, a bearish call spread (selling a call at a lower strike while buying a higher-strike call) provides a defined risk strategy. This spread could generate a credit while benefiting from potential downside relief if TSLA declines.
The covered strangle provides an attractive opportunity for Tesla investors to generate additional yield while maintaining stock exposure. If Tesla remains within the $280–$390 range, investors stand to collect the full premium. If Tesla moves significantly, they either take profits at a higher price or acquire additional shares at a discount—both favorable outcomes for long-term investors.
For those already holding TSLA, this strategy offers a practical way to enhance returns in a neutral to slightly bullish environment while managing potential risks effectively.
| Related articles/content |
|---|
| Teslas Road Ahead Is Musk Steering the Company Off-Road | 11 Feb 2025 |
| More from the author |
|---|
| Koen Hoorelbeke's articles on Saxo Follow Koen Hoorelbeke on BlueSky social media platform |
| Check out these guides and case studies: |
|---|
| In-depth guide to using long-term options for strategic portfolio management Our specialized resource designed to learn you strategically manage profits and reduce reliance on single (or few) positions within your portfolio using long-term options. This guide is crafted to assist you in understanding and applying long-term options to diversify investments and secure gains while maintaining market exposure. |
| Case study: using covered calls to enhance portfolio performance This case study delves into the covered call strategy, where an investor holds a stock and sells call options to generate premium income. The approach offers a balanced method for generating income and managing risk, with protection against minor declines and capped potential gains. |
| Case study: using protective puts to manage risk This analysis examines the protective put strategy, where an investor owns a stock and buys put options to safeguard against significant declines. Despite the cost of the premium, this approach offers peace of mind and financial protection, making it ideal for risk-averse investors. |
| Case study: using cash-secured puts to acquire stocks at a discount and generate income This review investigates the cash-secured put strategy, where an investor sells put options while holding enough cash to buy the stock if exercised. This method balances income generation with the potential to acquire stocks at a lower cost, appealing to cautious investors. |
| Case study: using collars to balance risk and reward This study focuses on the collar strategy, where an investor owns a stock, buys protective puts, and sells call options to balance risk and reward. This cost-neutral approach, achieved by offsetting the cost of puts with the premiums from calls, provides a safety net and additional income, making it suitable for cautious investors. |
Outrageous Predictions
Head of Investment Content Switzerland
Outrageous Predictions
Senior Relationship Manager
Outrageous Predictions
Chief Investment Strategist
Outrageous Predictions
Chief Investment Strategist
Outrageous Predictions
Global Head of Investment Strategy
Outrageous Predictions
Investor Content Strategist
Outrageous Predictions
Global Head of Macro Strategy
Outrageous Predictions
Global Head of Macro Strategy
Outrageous Predictions
Global Head of Macro Strategy
Outrageous Predictions
Global Head of Investment Strategy