Macro: Sandcastle economics
Invest wisely in Q3 2024: Discover SaxoStrats' insights on navigating a stable yet fragile global economy.
Chief Investment Strategist
Summary: Despite many parts of the US consumer price index remains sticky at a high level the headline figures showing inflation is coming down as expected got equities excited and traders to now price 100 basis points of Fed rate cuts by January FOMC meeting. In our view that is a disconnect that is difficult to link to the current economic data unless we get a crisis moment. In today's equity note we also discuss the disastrous performance of Disney's streaming business and in Europe the impressive Q1 results from ING Groep.
The US April CPI report yesterday boosted sentiment as traders pushed the forward curve on Fed Funds Futures higher (pricing rate cuts) with the market now pricing rate cuts of 100 basis points by the January FOMC meeting. These expectations do not fit with the economy unless we get a severe economic crisis in the second half. Why is that?
US coincident economic indicators are suggesting the US economy is growing at trend growth. Nominal GDP growth is at 7% y/y and the median wage is up 6.4% compared to a year ago. While the US labour market has softened a bit lately it still remains tighter than before the pandemic started back in 2020. Financial conditions have also recently eased despite the crisis among US regional banks which again suggests that the economy is able to absorb the higher interest rates. Finally, it is important to recognize that while the headline inflation is coming down the core service inflation remains high at 6.3% (see chart below). It is not realistic that the Fed will have sustained inflation around their target until very late this year or early next year. It is because of the factors mentioned above that the forward curve seems disconnected and therefore it must a crisis that triggers the Fed Funds rate cut.
One potential crisis that could trigger significant rate cuts are a drastic cut to US government spending to avoid a default. The US government deficit is currently 8% of nominal GDP and thus a significant driver of the strong nominal GDP growth we are observing. If the US government is forced to rein in spending then that could be a significant negative impulse. Cutting the deficit from -8% to -4% would correspond to a 3.7% reduction in government spending and thus potentially triggering a harder than expected recession.
But regardless of this apparent disconnect in Fed Funds futures the equity market liked the inflation report pushing equities higher and signalling that the equity market is still not pricing in a hard recession, but instead a small one in real terms while the nominal economy will just continue to grow.
Years ago Disney decided the future of distribution was streaming and because it was so late to the game it based its entry into the industry on a being a price leader to gain critical mass. The aggressive pricing strategy worked with Disney quickly gaining critical mass with the number of Disney+ subscribers hitting 158mn in FY23 Q2 (ending 31 March) compared to Netflix’s 233mn subscribers.
The critique of Disney from activist investor Nelson Peltz was the cost level which the company earlier agreed was too high and reaffirmed on the earnings call that it is looking to cut costs by $5.5bn this year. But coming back to Disney+, the surprising fact in the earnings release is that Disney lost $659mn on its streaming service, which was lower than the estimated loss of $850mn. How can the company lose $2.6bn on an annual basis for a service with 158mn paying users? But it gets worse, Disney expects the loss in its streaming business to widen in the current quarter. Looking at the earnings release the increase in capital expenditures is mostly related to higher technology spending to support its streaming services. When you look at the operating income breakdown across the various businesses it should be worrying for shareholders as the streaming business clearly has worse financial metrics than linear networks and thus it looks like streaming will destroy shareholder value for quite some time.
ING Groep, which is a Dutch financial services firm spanning banking, asset management, and insurance, reported Q1 net income this morning of €1.6bn vs est. €1.2bn with the majority of the beat coming from higher than expected net interest income and lower than estimated loan loss provisions (€250mn less loan loss provisions) suggesting that ING’s customers are able to absorb higher interest rates without causing a big deterioration in the loan book. This is encouraging for both the macro economy and ING shareholders. Management is so upbeat on the future that it is increasing its share buyback programme to €1.5bn compared to a market value of €41.6bn. Management is also stating that it is quite confident on the loan loss provisions for the rest of the year. With an indicated dividend yield of 4.9% the stock has always attracted dividend income investors and with the share buyback programme in place the total yield to shareholders will be close to 8-9% annualised. ING shares are up 4%.