No, a greater Ethereum staking ratio is not strictly great No, a greater Ethereum staking ratio is not strictly great No, a greater Ethereum staking ratio is not strictly great

No, a greater Ethereum staking ratio is not strictly great

Mads Eberhardt

Cryptocurrency Analyst

Summary:  The Ethereum community largely shares a positive outlook on the fact that more Ether is staked, as it implies that more Ether cannot be sold in the near term. However, we do not share that view. Instead, we argue that a lower staking ratio maintains solid fundamentals, including limiting the issuance of Ether and retaining high staking rewards. Too, it signifies that Ether is much more than merely staking. As a consequence, Ethereum should not fight for more but less staking.

On the 1st of December 2020, the staking contract of Ethereum launched, offering holders to stake Ether, in plain English, verify transactions on the Ethereum network by locking up their Ether. For nearly 2.5 years, the staking contract was a one-way street, making stakers unable to unstake. However, on April 12, 2023, staking on Ethereum turned into a two-way street on account of the Shanghai hard fork, at long last providing stakers with the option to unstake.

Still, in the time past the Shanghai hard fork, considerably more Ether has been staked than unstaked. To be exact, a net total of slightly more than 25,300 validators have joined the staking contract. Each validator represents 32 Ether, by which about 809,600 more Ether has been staked following the Shanghai hard fork. This implies that 18.78mn Ether is presently staked, amounting to around 15.6% of the total supply of nearly 120.26mn Ether. Also, about 72,500 validators are in the activation queue waiting to enter the staking contract, expected to be fully enrolled within the next around 40 days.

Although the activation queue to stake is somewhat comprehensive, it is nowhere near setting the staking ratio of Ethereum side-by-side with other proof-of-stake cryptocurrencies. Take Solana and Avalanche. They have staking ratios of 71.5% and 60%, respectively, whereas Ethereum is set to have a staking ratio equal to 17.55% once the present activation queue has been cleared given that no unstake.

After all, over the next two years, we expect staked Ether to approach 35mn to 40mn, after which we anticipate that it slowly nears 45mn. However, we view a staking ratio above 50%, meaning at least 60mn staked Ether, as highly unlikely. Although other cryptocurrencies present a staking ratio much higher than this level, Ethereum has characteristics that largely discourage substantial staking. This involves a lower staking reward, the requirement of 32 Ether for a single validator, queues to stake and unstake, negative supply growth following the merge, so non-stakers do not feel forced to stake upon otherwise inherent constant dilution, and a second-to-none ecosystem of applications to elsewhere employ Ether if not staked.

A higher staking ratio causes greater issuance and lower staking rewards

The staking ratio of Ethereum attracts attention mainly thanks to two factors, both of which largely impact the future fundamentals of the cryptocurrency. The Ethereum network responds to additional validators by increasing the overall issuance of Ether rewarded to stakers, however, this is not realized linearly, causing individual staking rewards to decline. For example, by the present 18.7mn staked Ether, the network issues about 720,000 Ether yearly rewarding stakers with an issuance reward of 3.8%. In contrast, provided that the amount of Ether staked more than doubles to the upper end of our near-term estimate of 40mn Ether, Ethereum would then issue 1.06mn Ether at an issuance reward of 2.6%. This triggers over 300,000 extra Ether to be issued yearly at a total present cost of over $550mn, sooner rather than later for the market to absorb, whereas stakers are to be rewarded with over one percent less in issuance rewards.

In fact, one should not merely consider the issuance reward, as the overall staking reward consists of an issuance reward, transaction tips, and maximal extractable value (MEV). The latter two are related to the reward of proposing a block. In case the number of validators doubles, any given validator is half as likely to propose a block, ultimately reducing both tips and MEV rewards by half. These two types of rewards together paid roughly 2.6% in annualized rewards since the Ethereum merge on the 15th of September 2022. Altogether, given that staked Ether increases to 40mn, the staking reward is reduced by up to 2.5 percentage points yearly from 6.3% to around 3.8% for all stakers.

A greater Ethereum staking ratio is not strictly great

This indicates that both non-stakers and stakers are worse off by a greater staking ratio. Both parties get diluted relatively more by the greater issuance. To make matters worse, stakers simultaneously receive substantially less in staking rewards.

Indeed, in this case, relatively more Ether has shifted from non-staked to staked, suddenly receiving a staking reward compared to nothing previously. Based on this factor, one may argue that it is just a zero-sum game, in that the increased issuance and reduced staking reward are transferred to the newly staked Ether, but it yet deteriorates the fundamentals of Ethereum the more the market deems it necessary to stake Ether. Such a shift also signifies that there are limited other applications and use cases wherein to utilize Ether rather than stake them, overall reducing the value of the Ethereum network. So, the community should in fact call for less staking rather than more, although it means that less Ether is locked in the staking contract short-term. In the best case, less staking is accomplished by expanding the ecosystem, so there are more on-chain alternatives to staking.

All things being equal, it would be another case given that the Ethereum network benefited widely from additional validators with respect to scalability, decentralization, or security, but that is not true. To set the record straight, regarding scalability, the transactional output remains the same no matter the number of validators. Next, the network does not by default become more decentralized provided that more Ether is staked, as it is rather the staking distribution among holders, exchanges, liquid staking providers, and other intermediaries that is vital in this context. Lastly, the Ethereum proof-of-stake mechanism is so resistant to outside attacks that it barely achieves a higher degree of security beyond a certain staking threshold that was arguably reached a long time ago.

Source: Saxo Group


The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (
Full disclaimer (
Full disclaimer (

Saxo Bank (Schweiz) AG
The Circle 38

Contact Saxo

Select region


All trading carries risk. Losses can exceed deposits on margin products. You should consider whether you understand how our products work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. To help you understand the risks involved we have put together a general Risk Warning series of Key Information Documents (KIDs) highlighting the risks and rewards related to each product. The KIDs can be accessed within the trading platform. Please note that the full prospectus can be obtained free of charge from Saxo Bank (Switzerland) ltd. or the issuer.

This website can be accessed worldwide however the information on the website is related to Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. All clients will directly engage with Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. and all client agreements will be entered into with Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. and thus governed by Swiss Law.

The content of this website represents marketing material and has not been notified or submitted to any supervisory authority.

If you contact Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. or visit this website, you acknowledge and agree that any data that you transmit to Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd., either through this website, by telephone or by any other means of communication (e.g. e-mail), may be collected or recorded and transferred to other Saxo Bank Group companies or third parties in Switzerland or abroad and may be stored or otherwise processed by them or Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. You release Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. from its obligations under Swiss banking and securities dealer secrecies and, to the extent permitted by law, data protection laws as well as other laws and obligations to protect privacy. Saxo Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. has implemented appropriate technical and organizational measures to protect data from unauthorized processing and disclosure and applies appropriate safeguards to guarantee adequate protection of such data.

Apple, iPad and iPhone are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc.