Senior Fixed Income Strategist
Summary: Following the Fed meeting last week, we have seen the MOVE index falling to historic lows. Although low volatility is what the Fed is looking to achieve, we believe that it creates even higher market risk as we are approaching the US election.
I cannot say it enough: US Treasuries are the biggest mousetrap of all time.
As we explained in an article we published last week, near-zero yields offer just a limited upside for investors while the downside remains large. On top of it, volatility in US Treasuries has sunk to the lowest level seen in history, making them even less attractive.
I am shocked to see a number of articles discussing how the US yield curve steepened during Friday’s afternoon session as the stock market was sliding. Is it worthwhile to pay attention to a one basis point movement in 30-year Treasury yields amid a selloff in the equity market? Maybe I am becoming too old for this game, but I cannot bear news channels discussing government bonds' movements when there is none.
At the moment, the yield curve is dead. We will not see it moving on the basis of monetary policy expectations because the market has received the Fed's message loud and clear. What the Fed has failed to see, however, is that as the US election approaches, volatility in US Treasuries is going to resume in any case. In this context, the attempt to eradicate market volatility actually might cause even higher uncertainty.
The anxiety surrounding the US election is mounting. Everybody knows that this will be an election like no other where we’ll most likely see a significant delay of the results amid postal ballots.
By keeping interest rates low for longer, the Fed is producing the unwanted side effect that whenever there is volatility, market reactions will be amplified. In the destabilizing case of a selloff, panicking investors will sell whatever is hot in their portfolio. At that point, the market will find out that risky assets have become riskier because of the Fed low-interest rate policies. As a matter of facts, companies have been leveraging up their balance steadily as the Fed was cutting interest rates, contributing to a vulnerable system apt to selloffs. It’s a vicious circle, which will never stops. When the Fed perceives panic, it will implement Modern Monetary Theory policies. Hence, companies start to take on more debt until volatility manifests itself and the Fed will need to act again. Only that volatility will be every time higher than before.
A new fragmented world order can render some of today's infrastructure obselete, but it also calls for massive new investments across the globe, which requires a new set of strategic and tactical investment strategies.
Steen Jakobsen,
Chief Investment Officer
As globalisation turns to fragmentation, China seems set on playing a role in the global economy, while simultaneously working towards proofing its own economic situation from external shocks and crises.
Redmond Wong,
Market Strategist
The recent bank runs and ensuing challenges are reminicent of something we've seen before. Will it end like the S&L crises of 1986 and 1995?
Chris Dembik,
Head of Macroeconomic Research
Equity markets need to recalibrate to another - fragmented - global world. What's your view on equities in this market - are they going up or down?
Peter Garnry,
Head of Equity Strategy
With every development comes new opportunites, some of which could be in India. Have you considered the country as a part of your diversification strategy?
Charu Chanana,
Market Strategist
A collar is an option strategy that allows some protection while maintaining some upside potential. What investment would you like to use a collar strategy for?
Hans Oudshoorn,
Trainer Academy
There are arguments to be made for many commodities to have upside. Which are you paying the most attention to this quarter?
Ole S. Hansen,
Head of Commodity Strategy
In a very challenging macro environment, which currencies do you think will come out on top?
John J. Hardy,
Head of FX Strategy
