Alphabet and the antitrust lawsuit Alphabet and the antitrust lawsuit Alphabet and the antitrust lawsuit

Alphabet and the antitrust lawsuit

Equities 5 minutes to read
Mahesh Sethuraman

Sales Trader

Summary:  On the whole, given the stellar return to growth in earnings in Q3 and the digital spending rebound likely to continue in the post covid world, the antitrust case by DoJ should prove to be a minor hurdle in the accelerating digital business landscape for Alphabet

October was an interesting month for Alphabet. US Department of Justice filed a complaint against  Google for alleged anticompetitive business practices in particular to maintain its monopoly in search services and advertising. The main focus of DoJ is the exclusionary agreements that Google has entered into with companies like Apple and Verizon which preload Google as the default search engine in their products and services. The contention of the case is that Google enjoys 94% market share of search in mobiles and 82% on PC in the US. This was a long pending reality facing not just Google but most big tech companies in US. But the fact that Google was the first in line, and that DoJ chose to focus specifically on search services where the monopoly can be established easily suggests the very conscious choice to follow the  DoJ’s case against Microsoft on similar grounds in the 90s.

Source: Bloomberg

Despite the fact that the long awaited antitrust complaint was officially filed and that more governments around the world are framing policies to tame the monopolistic policies of the big tech companies, market was quite happy to ignore the possible ramifications and the Alphabet share in fact closed higher on the day of the complaint. Since then it has announced stellar earnings for the Q3 with topline and EPS thumping the estimates riding on the broad based rebound in digital ad spending. Search revenues improved on their robust baseline, Youtube revenues crossing 5bn for the first time, and Cloud revenues grew by 45% to $3.4bn. A stirring comeback after the Q2 slowdown was enough to convince the bulls to ride ahead.

While the immediate reaction in the market highlights that the antitrust lawsuit doesn’t weigh on investor’s minds heavily now, given the long drawn battle of Microsoft and the strikingly similar nature of framing the lawsuit, Alphabet and its investors must be prepared for a long drawn, painful process of defending its actions against an increasingly bipartisan support in the government.

Google’s initial response to the complaint is as follows:

  • So many businesses beyond Tech have such exclusionary agreements to promote their products – Cereal brand paying a supermarket for a choice display location
  • Other search engines have the choice to pay as well and in some case they are paying currently to offer their product as the default choice
  • Scope of search business expands beyond text search and should factor in voice search and other evolving modes of internet usage
  • It’s easy to replace the preloaded choice of search engine in all the devices and services
  • That it enables the company to offer Android Operating System and Services for free

If DoJ is shadowing the Microsoft case in its framing, it seems Google is following Microsoft’s playbook in its response. But as tempting as it is to compare the two cases, it’s hard to argue Google’s fortunes will be as much of a roller coaster as Microsoft’s was.

  • With or without distributor payments, Google is the undisputed market leader among search engines
  • Some analysts even argue that if DoJ forces Google stop paying its distributors, it might actually benefit the company as it’ll save substantial expenses for the company without a commensurate impact on revenue
  • The systemic effect of banning the payments given the massive amount of revenue Google contributes to the distributors – For instance, the payments from Google to Apple are estimated to be between $8-12 bn every year. It is quite possibly a bigger concern for Apple than Google.
  • While Google’s initial response is similar to Microsoft, the precedence of the long drawn, exhausting battle of Microsoft will force Google to be more dynamic and flexible in their response as the case evolves

On the whole, given the stellar return to growth in earnings in Q3 and the digital spending rebound likely to continue in the post-covid world, DoJ’s antitrust case should prove to be a minor hurdle in the accelerating digital business landscape for Alphabet. But what Alphabet investors have to contend with is that this is likely to be the starting point of what is likely to be an era of greater regulatory scrutiny for big Tech around the world.


Saxo Capital Markets (Australia) Limited prepares and distributes information/research produced within the Saxo Bank Group for informational purposes only. In addition to the disclaimer below, if any general advice is provided, such advice does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider the appropriateness of trading any financial instrument as trading can result in losses that exceed your initial investment. Please refer to our Analysis Disclaimer, and our Financial Services Guide and Product Disclosure Statement. All legal documentation and disclaimers can be found at

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service. Access and use of Saxo News & Research and any Saxo Bank Group website are subject to (i) the Terms of Use; (ii) the full Disclaimer; and (iii) the Risk Warning in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group.

Saxo News & Research is provided for informational purposes, does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. No Saxo Bank Group entity shall be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information on Saxo News & Research.

To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, such content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication.

None of the information contained here constitutes an offer to purchase or sell a financial instrument, or to make any investments.Saxo Capital Markets does not take into account your personal investment objectives or financial situation and makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the information nor for any loss arising from any investment made in reliance of this presentation. Any opinions made are subject to change and may be personal to the author. These may not necessarily reflect the opinion of Saxo Capital Markets or its affiliates.

Please read our disclaimers:
- Full Disclaimer (
- Analysis Disclaimer (
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (

Saxo Capital Markets (Australia) Limited
Suite 1, Level 14, 9 Castlereagh St
Sydney NSW 2000

Contact Saxo

Select region


The Saxo trading platform has received numerous awards and recognition. For details of these awards and information on awards visit

Saxo Capital Markets (Australia) Limited ABN 32 110 128 286 AFSL 280372 (‘Saxo’ or ‘Saxo Capital Markets’) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Saxo Bank A/S, headquartered in Denmark. Please refer to our General Business Terms, Financial Services Guide, Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination to consider whether acquiring or continuing to hold financial products is suitable for you, prior to opening an account and investing in a financial product.

Trading in financial instruments carries various risks, and is not suitable for all investors. Please seek expert advice, and always ensure that you fully understand these risks before trading. Saxo Capital Markets does not provide ‘personal’ financial product advice, any information available on this website is ‘general’ in nature and for informational purposes only. Saxo Capital Markets does not take into account an individual’s needs, objectives or financial situation. The Target Market Determination should assist you in determining whether any of the products or services we offer are likely to be consistent with your objectives, financial situation and needs.

Apple, iPad and iPhone are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. AppStore is a service mark of Apple Inc.

The information or the products and services referred to on this website may be accessed worldwide, however is only intended for distribution to and use by recipients located in countries where such use does not constitute a violation of applicable legislation or regulations. Products and Services offered on this website is not intended for residents of the United States and Japan.

Please click here to view our full disclaimer.