Interest rate sensitivity on full display

Interest rate sensitivity on full display

Equities 8 minutes to read
Peter Garnry

Chief Investment Strategist

Summary:  Bubbles stocks and many aggressively priced US biotechnology stocks have been the hardest hit segments of the equity market lately. In this equity update, we illustrate this interest rate sensitivity, which is fully explained and predictable by equity valuation theory. We show the dynamics of interest rate sensitivity for aggressively valued technology stocks through concrete examples on cost of capital.


Today we follow up on Tuesday’s note on cost of capital as the last couple of trading days have shown that the interest rate sensitivity is well alive and is showing up exactly where the theory of equity valuations would predict it. As we have said multiple times, the two hardest hit segments in the equity market from rising interest rates are the capital-intensive industries with a high degree of debt financing (utilities, telecommunication, real estate etc.) and the aggressively valued technology companies. It makes sense that highly debt financed companies are impacted as the cost of capital is dominated by cost of debt which has a direct link to the rising interest rates. This is also why our green transformation basket was hit initially by rising interest rates.

Applying classical statistical analysis on the interest rate sensitivity is difficult and due to the low signal-to-noise ratio in financial markets, it is almost impossible to crystalize the interest rate sensitivity in broader equity indices. As we wrote on Tuesday on the back of interest rate and equity market data since 1962, we observe that monthly equity returns are cut in half when interest rates are rising compared to when they fall. In any case, equities still have their drift (positive trend) despite the direction of interest rates and likely also what Fed Chair Powell recently alluded to when he said there is no real link between interest rate changes and equity markets.

One way to illustrate the interest rate sensitivity is to compare the 10-day rolling mean return of S&P 500 vs our bubble stocks basket on different levels of US 10-year yield since 4 August 2020, which is date then long-term US interest rates bottomed out – we have been in a rising interest rate environment ever since. Here is becomes quite clear that as the US 10-year yield moved above 1.2% the return dynamics of S&P 500 and our bubble stocks changed quite dramatically. Unless interest rates continue aggressively higher from here, we believe the equity market and bubble stocks will consolidate and stop the bleeding. If, however, the US 10-year yield march towards 2% in a fast fashion it could cause havoc in the speculative parts of the technology sector.

Why are technology companies hit by rising interest rates?

Another reason why the Fed insists on a low overall impact on equities from rising interest rates, and which has been vindicated lately per our chart above, is due to the concept of equity risk premium. This is the key to understand why bubble stocks have been hit hard by rising interest rates.

The equity risk premium on US equities is currently estimated to be 4.6% by finance professor Aswath Damodaran, which is the leading expert on equity risk premium and equity valuations, which is close to the lowest level since the Great Financial Crisis. The US equity risk premium has been stable over the past 10 years with an average of 5.6% and a standard deviation of 0.7%. This takes us to the next concept of cost of capital which is essentially the weighted average of cost of equity and cost of capital.

Cost of equity is essentially the risk-free rate (US 10-year) plus the equity risk premium expected by investors. The S&P 500 has currently short-term and long-term debt of 1,152 per share which means that the average S&P 500 company has a debt ratio of 23% in the cost of capital equation. Using the yield-to-maturity on US investment grade corporate bonds of 2.35%, we can calculate the cost of capital for S&P 500 as (1.55% + 4.63%) x 77% + 2.35% x 23% = 5.28%. Of this cost of capital the risk-free rate is only a 30% component – a 100 basis point move higher from current levels, assuming constant credit spread and unchanged equity risk premium, would increase cost of capital to 6.28% or a factor of 0.19 increase in the discount rate.

If we look at the bubble stocks, then we are suddenly talking about companies where the equity side is 98% of total cost of capital. What makes it worse is that they are all aggressively valued with implied equity risk premiums in the range -2% to +1%. This means that the risk-free rate suddenly dominates the cost of equity and since the equity weight is close to 98% in many of these names the entire segment is very sensitive to rising interest rates unlike the overall equity market.

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Upending the global order at blinding speed

    Quarterly Outlook

    Upending the global order at blinding speed

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ...
  • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Quarterly Outlook

    China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    Quarterly Outlook

    FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Quarterly Outlook

    Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Althea Spinozzi

    Head of Fixed Income Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: Will lower rates lift all boats in equities?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: Will lower rates lift all boats in equities?

    Peter Garnry

    Chief Investment Strategist

    After a period of historically high equity index concentration driven by the 'Magnificent Seven' sto...
  • Commodity Outlook: Gold and silver continue to shine bright

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Gold and silver continue to shine bright

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Macro Outlook: The US rate cut cycle has begun

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro Outlook: The US rate cut cycle has begun

    Peter Garnry

    Chief Investment Strategist

    The Fed started the US rate cut cycle in Q3 and in this macro outlook we will explore how the rate c...

Content disclaimer

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-mena/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)


Business Hills Park – Building 4,
4th Floor, office 401, Dubai Hills Estate, P.O. Box 33641, Dubai, UAE

Contact Saxo

Select region

UAE
UAE

All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.