calls_puts_bid_ask_chart_M

Open Interest Monitor - 7 Oct 2025 - IBIT and ETHA deep dive

Options 10 minutes to read
MicrosoftTeams-image (3)
Koen Hoorelbeke

Investment and Options Strategist

Open Interest Monitor – 7 October 2025 - IBIT and ETHA deep dive

Data through market close 2025-10-03

This monitor scans US-listed options markets to identify where open interest (OI) is concentrated, where skew and IV suggest positioning, and how this translates into sentiment signals. Each edition also features a focused options deep dive on a selected underlying—where we analyze volatility structure, positioning, and flow data to better understand what market participants may be anticipating.


Deep dive: what options tell us about Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs

After Bitcoin hit a new all-time high over the weekend, options trading in crypto-linked ETFs also saw a spike in activity. This week, we take a closer look at two of the most actively traded crypto ETFs with listed options: IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust) and ETHA (iShares Ethereum Trust). We focus on the options expiring this Friday (10 October) and the next monthly expiry (21 November), looking at where investors are positioned and what the options market is pricing in.

Understanding skew and volatility structure

Option prices often reveal what traders expect—or fear. By comparing the implied volatility of calls and puts with similar deltas (e.g., 25-delta puts vs 25-delta calls), we can spot whether downside protection (puts) or upside speculation (calls) is more expensive.

IBIT: For options expiring this Friday, puts are slightly more expensive than calls, which may reflect near-term hedging. But for the November expiry, that flips—calls are pricier, suggesting more demand for upside exposure over the next few weeks.

ETHA: A similar pattern, but more pronounced. The difference in implied volatility between puts and calls in November is wider than in IBIT, indicating stronger relative demand for upside in Ethereum.

Additionally, the term structure—the change in implied volatility between shorter- and longer-dated options—is upward sloping for both ETFs. This is often seen when traders expect more uncertainty or movement in the future than in the immediate term.

  • IBIT’s longer-dated options (Nov) are priced about 3.3 percentage points higher in volatility than this week’s options.
  • ETHA’s difference is even steeper, at around 6.9 percentage points, suggesting traders see Ethereum as more volatile—or eventful—going into year-end.

Key price levels: where the market sees movement

From current option prices, we can estimate how much the market expects these ETFs to move by the end of the week.

  • IBIT: Trading at $69.81, with a projected range of $67.37 to $72.25 for this Friday (based on options pricing).
  • ETHA: Trading at $34.26, with a broader expected range of $32.31 to $36.22—a move of nearly 5.7%, reflecting higher implied volatility in Ethereum.

We also looked at the “max pain” point—the price where the most call and put options would expire worthless. While not a forecast, it’s sometimes used to gauge where market-makers might prefer the underlying to settle.

  • Max pain levels: IBIT at $65, ETHA at $32—both below current prices.
2025-10-07-01-ETHA-OI_10oct2025
Open interest distribution for ETHA options expiring 10 October 2025, with peak call volume centered at-the-money around $34–35 © SaxoTraderGO / Pro
This ETHA chart shows a tight concentration of call and put positions centered near the current price, reinforcing the idea that the market sees $34–35 as a gravitational level for expiry. With a relatively low put/call ratio (0.42), the data also hints at limited demand for downside protection in the very near term.
2025-10-07-02-IBIT-OI_21nov2025
Open interest distribution for IBIT options expiring 21 November 2025, highlighting concentration in calls at 65–130 strike levels © SaxoTrader Go/Pro

By contrast, the IBIT chart for November shows significant open interest building far above current price, especially at the $100 and $130 strikes. This suggests either speculative bullish interest or aggressive call overwriting strategies by large holders.

Where positions are concentrated

By scanning open interest (the number of outstanding options contracts), we can see where traders have placed their bets or hedges.

  • IBIT: Large positions are clustered around $65.5, $69.5, and $70 into this Friday. For November, attention shifts higher—toward $72, $100, and $130.
  • ETHA: The $31–36 range dominates both short- and longer-dated expiries. The weekly chain is centered tightly around spot, while November flows spread slightly wider—$29, $31, $36.

Option flow and unusual activity

Options flow data also highlights where investors are focusing capital.

  • ETHA: A large trade in the 10 Oct 36.5 Call, with over 7,000 contracts traded, suggests positioning for a short-term breakout.
  • IBIT: Notable volume in weekly calls around the $72 level also reflects speculative upside interest.

When we group recent trades by type, we see that net premium spent is higher on calls for both ETFs. This doesn't mean investors are bullish per se—but it does show they’re paying more to gain exposure to potential upside than downside.

Educational takeaways

  • Options skew: By comparing the cost of puts vs calls, traders can assess whether the market is more concerned with downside protection or upside participation. For ETHA and IBIT, skew flips from put-heavy near-term to call-heavy further out.
  • Expected move: Knowing the range the market expects can help set price targets for spreads, exits, or protective trades.
  • Open interest clusters: These may act as psychological or technical zones. High OI at certain strikes can pin prices toward expiry, or signal zones where traders are most active.
  • Max pain: While not a trading signal, the max pain level offers an idea of where the greatest number of options would expire worthless—potentially shaping price action near expiry.
  • Flow and volume: Monitoring unusual activity helps identify where large capital is flowing—whether for speculation or hedging. It doesn’t predict direction but reveals where interest is concentrated.

How to use this information – educational perspectives for different market views

With volatility levels still elevated—especially in Ethereum-linked options—some traders may look to structure positions that benefit from rich premiums and defined risk. The current option setup in ETHA and IBIT allows for varied interpretations depending on market expectations, but each carries trade-offs and potential drawbacks.

  • If your outlook is bullish: Traders might sell cash-secured puts at strikes near the recent open interest clusters (e.g., ETHA $31 or IBIT $65). The goal is to collect premium while being willing to own the ETF at a lower price. While high implied volatility boosts premium income, it also reflects greater downside risk. A sharp selloff could result in assignment and unrealized losses on the long ETF position.
  • If your outlook is neutral: With both ETFs showing concentrated open interest near spot, short iron condors or straddles may be considered for rangebound expectations. These strategies benefit from time decay, but losses can escalate quickly if the ETF breaks out of the expected range. Tight risk management and well-defined wings are essential to avoid large drawdowns.
  • If your outlook is bearish: Bear call spreads placed near the upper end of the expected move range (e.g., ETHA $36 or IBIT $72) allow for limited-risk participation in downside scenarios. However, if prices continue rallying—particularly in a momentum-driven crypto environment—these spreads can incur max loss. The fixed risk is helpful, but sizing and conviction must align.

These examples are for educational purposes only. Open interest, volatility, and price levels can offer useful clues, but outcomes depend on broader market conditions, catalysts, and personal risk tolerance. Use defined-risk strategies and ensure proper position sizing. Actual outcomes depend on volatility shifts, news catalysts, and your personal risk profile. Use defined-risk strategies and a disciplined approach to trade management. Monitoring unusual activity helps identify where large capital is flowing—whether for speculation or hedging. It doesn’t predict direction but reveals where interest is concentrated.


Open interest ranking: shifting focus to one-month momentum

Following the deep dive into IBIT and ETHA, we return to our core scan across the US-listed options universe. In past editions, we ranked underlyings by total open interest—a measure of where institutional exposure is largest. While still relevant, this week we spotlight a different angle: where open interest is growing the fastest.

Specifically, we rank underlyings by one-month change in open interest (1M OI % Chg), filtered for names with daily options volume above 100,000 contracts. This shift highlights where trader interest is rising most sharply and may uncover early positioning, momentum strategies, or event-driven build-ups that aren't yet reflected in the absolute OI leaderboard.

Top 20 by 1M OI % chg (options vol > 100,000)

RankSymbolNameLastIV Rank (%)Total OI1M OI % ChgOptions VolP/C Vol
1RRRichtech Robotics Inc Cl B6.1830.2300.4K1.4286182.8K0.19
2LACLithium Americas Corp9.0420.0457.6K0.8458249.2K0.28
3BYNDBeyond Meat Inc2.5764.1774.5K0.6568123.1K2.48
4FCXFreeport-Mcmoran Inc39.6730.11.5M0.3725183.3K0.26
5BULLWebull Corp Cl A14.1945.61.1M0.3596258.5K0.38
6BMNRBitmine Immersion Technologies Inc56.6528.91.3M0.3553449.4K0.38
7BITFBitfarms Ltd3.0111.81.0M0.3528127.6K0.22
8DKNGDraftkings Inc35.3732.7930.3K0.3459111.1K0.26
9QUBTQuantum Computing Inc24.6215.5561.0K0.3415451.9K0.56
10CIFRCipher Mining Inc14.752.51.3M0.2928280.6K0.18
11PLUGPlug Power Inc3.8193.01.7M0.2919961.3K0.16
12RKTRocket Companies Inc Cl A17.848.01.8M0.2741201.3K0.51
13USARUSA Rare Earth Inc25.9632.8305.3K0.2384165.2K0.28
14SOCSable Offshore Corp19.0965.7903.6K0.219192.0K1.29
15IBITIshares Bitcoin Trust ETF69.8127.47.1M0.2081.3M0.33
16GRABGrab Holdings Ltd Cl A6.1623.02.0M0.1893105.3K0.12
17PFEPfizer Inc27.3731.53.2M0.1645453.9K0.17
18WBDDiscovery Inc Series A18.9971.11.7M0.159117.0K0.90
19BTBTBit Digital Inc3.521.2666.9K0.1579158.1K0.05
20PYPLPaypal Holdings69.2545.41.7M0.1568219.5K0.36

Note: Table now ranks US-listed underlyings by highest one‑month OI change, filtered to daily options volume > 100,000.

Column explainer (see glossary below)

  • IV Rank (%): Position of current IV within its 1Y range
  • Total OI: Aggregate open contracts (calls + puts)
  • 1M OI % Chg: One-month percentage change in OI
  • Options Vol: Most recent trading day total options volume
  • P/C Vol: Put-to-call volume ratio (1-day snapshot)

What traders can take away

This week’s open interest flows highlight a surge in activity across several speculative and thematic names. Companies like Richtech Robotics (RR), Lithium Americas (LAC), and Beyond Meat (BYND) topped the list, with one-month open interest gains exceeding 60% in some cases. While some of these names remain on the fringes of broader market leadership, the volume and open interest build suggest traders are aggressively positioning for near-term moves.

Implied volatility is also back in focus. Plug Power (PLUG) stands out with the highest IV Rank at 93%, indicating current implied vol is near the top of its 12-month range. Barrick Gold and Kenvue follow closely, both with IV Ranks above 70%, possibly reflecting upcoming event risk or idiosyncratic volatility.

Put/call volume ratios also offer insight into positioning. Bond ETFs such as LQD and HYG show extreme put/call readings, suggesting institutional hedging activity or duration-related caution. On the other side, tickers like EEM and Barrick Gold show very low put/call ratios, hinting at speculative call buying or short-covering.

A few observations

Several low-volatility setups persist. TLT, the 20+ Year Treasury ETF, remains pinned at a 0% IV Rank—its implied vol is at the lowest point of the past year. The VIX itself is also near record lows, reflecting subdued index hedging demand. PDD Holdings, a major Chinese e-commerce firm, joins them with an IV Rank under 7%, which may indicate complacency or seasonal quiet.

Bond-focused ETFs continue to show defensive flows. HYG dominates the top of the put/call ratio leaderboard, reinforcing the notion that large players are seeking downside protection amid rate uncertainty. At the same time, exposure in AI and semiconductor themes remains strong. Notably, names like SOXL (3x Semiconductors), TSM, and BBAI (BigBear.ai) show elevated interest, suggesting traders are still betting on momentum in tech.


Conclusion

This week’s options data reveals a notable shift in trader focus. Instead of piling into the largest open interest names, activity is accelerating in smaller, thematic, or event-driven underlyings—particularly those linked to crypto, AI, and speculative tech. The deep dive into IBIT and ETHA shows how skew, volatility term structure, and open interest clusters can provide insight into sentiment and positioning, even in newer ETFs.

At the same time, high put/call ratios in fixed income ETFs and low IV Rank in benchmarks like the VIX and TLT suggest a market with pockets of caution despite calm surface conditions. While tech and semis continue to attract bullish flows, the broadening of open interest into diverse tickers indicates that traders are preparing for multiple outcomes rather than placing one-sided bets.

As always, understanding how open interest shifts—and where volatility is being priced—can offer useful clues about where the market’s attention is going next.


Glossary

  • Ticker: the exchange-listed symbol for the underlying stock, ETF, or index. Indices are noted with a $ prefix in general use, but we map them to specific exchange codes in the ticker string.
  • Name: the company or ETF name associated with the ticker. ETFs typically describe their focus, such as “S&P 500” or “20+ Year Treasury Bonds.”
  • Last: The last traded price of the underlying asset (stock, ETF, or index). This gives a reference point for where the asset currently trades and helps identify how close it is to key strike levels in the option chain.
  • IV Rank (%): Implied Volatility Rank (IV Rank) shows where current implied volatility sits relative to the past 12 months. A reading of 0% means IV is at its lowest point of the year; 100% means it's at the highest. Higher IV Rank suggests options are more expensive compared to recent history, which may favour premium-selling strategies.
  • Total Open Interest (Total OI): This is the total number of open option contracts across both calls and puts for the underlying. It represents outstanding positions that have not yet been closed or exercised. High OI is often associated with deep liquidity and significant institutional interest.
  • 1M OI % Change: Shows how much total open interest has changed over the past month. A rising figure can point to fresh positioning or increased speculation, while a falling number may indicate closed-out trades or reduced interest in the underlying.
  • Options Volume: The number of option contracts traded during the most recent session. High volume relative to open interest may suggest new trades are being initiated. Sudden spikes often coincide with market-moving news or upcoming events.
  • Put/Call Volume Ratio (P/C Vol): This ratio compares the volume of puts traded to calls on the same day. A ratio above 1.0 implies more puts were traded (often for downside protection), while a value below 1.0 shows call-heavy flow (often speculative or bullish). Extreme readings can highlight skewed sentiment or potential contrarian signals.
Related articles

Options are complex, high-risk products and require knowledge, investment experience and, in many applications, high risk acceptance. We recommend that before you invest in options, you inform yourself well about the operation and risks. In Saxo Bank's Terms of Use you will find more information on this in the Important Information Options, Futures, Margin and Deficit Procedure. You can also consult the Essential Information Document of the option you want to invest in on Saxo Bank's website.
This material is marketing content and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results.
The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options..

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Q4 Outlook for Investors: Diversify like it’s 2025 – don’t fall for déjà vu

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q4 Outlook for Investors: Diversify like it’s 2025 – don’t fall for déjà vu

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Q4 Outlook for Traders: The Fed is back in easing mode. Is this time different?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q4 Outlook for Traders: The Fed is back in easing mode. Is this time different?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    The Fed launched a new easing cycle in late Q3. Will this cycle now play out like 2000 or 2007?
  • Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    After the chaos of Q2, the quarter ahead should get a bit more clarity on how Trump 2.0 is impacting...
  • Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Upending the global order at blinding speed

    Quarterly Outlook

    Upending the global order at blinding speed

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ...
  • Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Quarterly Outlook

    Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

Disclaimer

The Saxo Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-hk/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)

None of the information contained here constitutes an offer to purchase or sell a financial instrument, or to make any investments. Saxo does not take into account your personal investment objectives or financial situation and makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the information nor for any loss arising from any investment made in reliance of this presentation. Any opinions made are subject to change and may be personal to the author. These may not necessarily reflect the opinion of Saxo or its affiliates.


Hong Kong

Contact Saxo

Select region

Hong Kong S.A.R
Hong Kong S.A.R

Saxo Capital Markets HK Limited (“Saxo”) is a company authorised and regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong. Saxo holds a Type 1 Regulated Activity (Dealing in Securities); Type 2 Regulated Activity (Dealing in Futures Contract); Type 3 Regulated Activity (Leveraged Foreign Exchange Trading); Type 4 Regulated Activity (Advising on Securities) and Type 9 Regulated Activity (Asset Management) licenses (CE No. AVD061). Registered address: 19th Floor, Shanghai Commercial Bank Tower, 12 Queen’s Road Central, Hong Kong.

Trading in financial instruments carries various risks, and is not suitable for all investors. Please seek expert advice, and always ensure that you fully understand these risks before trading. Trading in leveraged products may result in your losses exceeding your initial deposits. Saxo does not provide financial advice, any information available on this website is ‘general’ in nature and for informational purposes only. Saxo does not take into account an individual’s needs, objectives or financial situation. Please click here to view the relevant risk disclosure statements.

The Saxo trading platform has received numerous awards and recognition. For details of these awards and information on awards visit www.home.saxo/en-hk/about-us/awards.

The information or the products and services referred to on this site may be accessed worldwide, however is only intended for distribution to and use by recipients located in countries where such use does not constitute a violation of applicable legislation or regulations. Products and services offered on this website are not directed at, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity residing in the United States and Japan. Please click here to view our full disclaimer.

Apple, iPad and iPhone are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. AppStore is a service mark of Apple Inc. Android is a trademark of Google Inc.