Quarterly Outlook
Q1 Outlook for Traders: Five Big Questions and Three Grey Swans.
John J. Hardy
Global Head of Macro Strategy
Strap yourself in for key market questions that must be answered in 2026.
Palantir, SpaceX and AMD earnings: artificial intelligence gets three different reality checks
Key takeaways
Palantir, AMD and SpaceX test three layers of artificial intelligence: software, chips and physical infrastructure.
Investors will focus on guidance, cash generation and whether large commitments are becoming real revenue.
The results can show where AI economics are strengthening, and where spending still runs ahead of returns.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is often discussed as one industry. This week shows it is closer to a three-storey building.
Palantir reports after the United States market closes on 3 August 2026. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and SpaceX follow on 4 August 2026. Together, they cover data software, processors, launch services, satellite connectivity and artificial intelligence.
The question is whether demand becomes durable revenue, rising profits and cash that can fund the next stage. Recent technology volatility makes that distinction less academic.
Three floors, three invoices
Palantir sits on the software floor. Its platform helps organisations connect data with artificial intelligence tools and use them in daily operations. It can add customers without building factories or rockets, giving it attractive economics when growth remains strong.
The previous quarter set a demanding benchmark, with revenue rising 85%. This week, the useful signals are customer growth, large contracts and remaining deal value, meaning potential future revenue under existing agreements. The reaction may depend on evidence that momentum remains broad and repeatable.
AMD occupies the chip floor. It designs central processing units and graphics processing units, the computing engines behind servers and artificial intelligence systems. Data-centre revenue grew 57% last quarter, while new agreements strengthened its pipeline.
The key word is conversion. Commitments only create value when systems ship, software works and margins hold. Investors will listen for product delivery, supply, customer adoption and profitability. Strong sales with weaker margins would suggest that competition is becoming more expensive.
SpaceX owns much of the wiring. Starlink provides recurring subscription revenue, while launches, Starship and the recently combined artificial intelligence business require heavy investment.
Its first post-listing earnings will help separate the cash engine from the projects attached to it. Starlink had about 10 million subscribers at the end of March, but SpaceX spent far more on artificial intelligence than on space and connectivity combined during the first quarter. Can profitable connectivity finance several expensive frontiers at once?
The number behind the headline
These companies show why “AI exposure” is not one financial category.
Palantir can disappoint through slower guidance even after excellent growth. AMD can beat sales expectations but fall if margins or future shipments weaken. SpaceX can report strong Starlink progress yet concern investors if other projects absorb cash faster than expected.
The wider implications matter. Strong AMD demand would support chip, memory and data-centre suppliers. On Wednesday 5 August, SanDisk and Western Digital will extend the same test to storage, showing whether AI-driven data growth is translating into stronger demand and pricing for flash memory and hard drives. Strong Palantir growth would suggest companies are moving from testing artificial intelligence to using it in real operations. Strong SpaceX connectivity would support satellite broadband, while heavy spending would reinforce concerns about capital intensity.
Risks
Expectations are the first risk. Warning signs include slower customer growth at Palantir, delayed shipments or weaker margins at AMD, and capital spending rising faster than Starlink cash generation at SpaceX.
Execution is the second. Palantir must turn trials into wider deployments. AMD must deliver competitive systems on schedule. SpaceX must manage several costly projects without allowing one to weaken the others.
Investor playbook
Track contracts, shipments, recognised revenue and free cash flow in that order.
Compare growth with the capital required to produce it.
Give guidance more weight than headline profit when expectations already assume rapid expansion.
Check portfolio overlap. Different AI companies may depend on the same customers, budgets and market mood.
Three floors, one foundation
This week, artificial intelligence faces three exams. Can Palantir deepen customer use, can AMD turn commitments into shipped systems, and can SpaceX fund several ambitions without exhausting its strongest cash engine?
The results will not identify one universal winner. They will show where the economics are strongest today. Palantir offers the lightest model, AMD sits in the middle, and SpaceX carries the heaviest machinery. For investors, the useful habit is to follow the cash through every floor of the building. The story may begin with intelligence, but returns still depend on who gets paid, how often, and at what cost.
This material is marketing content and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results.
The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options.
Quarterly Outlook
-
-
Quarterly Outlook
Q1 Outlook for Investors: “AI” party hangover needs discipline and diversification
Charu Chanana
Chief Investment Strategist
2026 is a high-valuation, high-dispersion year: the AI story matures, policy becomes less predictabl... -
Quarterly Outlook
Q4 Outlook for Investors: Diversify like it’s 2025 – don’t fall for déjà vu
Jacob Falkencrone
Global Head of Investment Strategy
-
Quarterly Outlook
Q4 Outlook for Traders: The Fed is back in easing mode. Is this time different?
John J. Hardy
Global Head of Macro Strategy
The Fed launched a new easing cycle in late Q3. Will this cycle now play out like 2000 or 2007? -
Quarterly Outlook
Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally
Jacob Falkencrone
Global Head of Investment Strategy
-
Quarterly Outlook
Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity
John J. Hardy
Global Head of Macro Strategy
After the chaos of Q2, the quarter ahead should get a bit more clarity on how Trump 2.0 is impacting... -
Quarterly Outlook
Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios
Charu Chanana
Chief Investment Strategist
-
Quarterly Outlook
Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty
Ole Hansen
Head of Commodity Strategy
-
Quarterly Outlook
Upending the global order at blinding speed
John J. Hardy
Global Head of Macro Strategy
We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ... -
Quarterly Outlook
Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever
Jacob Falkencrone
Global Head of Investment Strategy
Disclaimer