try5

US midterms: five sectors where election surprises could move markets

Equities 5 minutes to read

Key takeaways

  • Expectations matter more than results. Markets react to surprises rather than election outcomes that investors already anticipate.
  • Five sectors face different political risks. Healthcare, energy, technology, banks and defence are particularly exposed to changes in policy and spending.
  • Politics can move prices, but profits drive long-term returns. Investors should focus on earnings, valuations and lasting business fundamentals.

Americans head to the polls on 3 November to decide who controls Congress for the final two years of President Donald Trump's term. Democrats are favoured to regain the House of Representatives, while control of the Senate remains uncertain.

History offers an intriguing statistic. Following all 19 US midterm elections between 1950 and 2022, the S&P 500 was higher 12 months later, with an average gain of roughly 15%. An impressive record, but no guarantee that history will repeat itself, especially with stock valuations already elevated.

chart321

For investors, however, the more interesting question is not simply whether stocks will rise after the vote. It is what happens differently from what markets already expect.

An anticipated Democratic victory might generate little reaction. An unexpected Republican sweep, or stronger Democratic gains, could force investors to rethink their assumptions.

While political headlines will attract attention, the more interesting investment story may unfold across individual sectors.

Wall Street has already placed its bets

Markets are forward-looking. Share prices reflect not only current conditions but also expectations about future policies, profits and risks.

A divided Congress could make major legislation harder to pass, limiting changes to taxes and regulation. Republican control of both chambers could preserve greater room for Trump's agenda. A Democratic sweep could increase political scrutiny and strengthen congressional influence over spending.

More importantly, the election's impact will not be evenly distributed across the market.

Five sectors, five different political stories

Healthcare: the politics of who pays

Healthcare companies are particularly exposed to government decisions.

Democratic gains could increase expectations of support for health insurance coverage, potentially helping hospitals and insurers. However, renewed pressure on prescription drug prices could weigh on pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer and Eli Lilly.

The distinction matters: more healthcare spending does not necessarily mean higher profits for every healthcare business.

Energy: oil, renewables and the power grid

Continued Republican control could reinforce support for domestic oil and gas production, potentially benefiting ExxonMobil and Chevron.

Stronger Democratic gains might improve sentiment towards renewable-energy companies such as First Solar and NextEra Energy by raising hopes of greater protection for clean-energy incentives.

Yet growing electricity demand from artificial intelligence and data centres creates opportunities across both traditional and renewable energy. Political preferences matter, but customers still need electricity.

Technology: AI meets Washington

Microsoft, Alphabet and Nvidia face growing political scrutiny over AI, competition and energy consumption.

Democratic gains could increase expectations of congressional investigations and tougher oversight. Republican control could support a more business-friendly approach, although technology regulation increasingly attracts attention from both parties.

For investors, the bigger issue remains whether enormous AI investments can produce equally impressive profits.

Financials: regulation is only half the equation

Banks such as JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America could benefit from expectations of lighter regulation under continued Republican control.

Democratic gains might raise concerns about oversight, consumer protection and capital requirements.

However, interest rates, loan demand and borrowers' ability to repay debts will probably matter more for bank earnings than congressional arithmetic.

Defence: politics meets geopolitics

Lockheed Martin and RTX depend heavily on government contracts, making budget negotiations particularly important.

A divided Congress could complicate spending agreements and delay programmes. Nevertheless, geopolitical tensions and military modernisation continue to support demand.

The central question is less whether defence spending disappears and more where, when and how efficiently it gets allocated.

The risks behind the election headlines

Three risks deserve particular attention.

First, political gridlock could create prolonged disputes over federal budgets and borrowing limits. Second, unexpected policy changes could affect corporate profits. Third, high equity valuations leave less room for disappointment, even if election results appear favourable.

Importantly, a political surprise does not automatically translate into legislation. Congress, the presidency and existing legal constraints all influence what actually changes.

An investor's election checklist

  • Watch surprises: compare results with expectations rather than reacting to the winning party.
  • Follow policy, not promises: distinguish political proposals from legislation that could materially affect earnings.
  • Look beyond sectors: companies within the same industry can experience very different outcomes.
  • Maintain perspective: assess whether price moves reflect lasting business changes or temporary political uncertainty.

The election ends. Investing continues.

Election night may produce clear winners in Washington, but identifying the winners on Wall Street will take longer.

Some companies may rally because feared policies never materialise. Others may fall despite favourable results because investors had already anticipated good news. Many businesses will continue growing, investing and competing regardless of which party controls Congress.

For investors, the opportunity lies in separating political noise from genuine changes in company fundamentals. After all, elections determine who makes the rules, but businesses still need to earn the profits.

Washington may decide tomorrow's headlines. Corporate earnings will shape the years that follow.

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Q1 Outlook for Traders: Five Big Questions and Three Grey Swans.

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q1 Outlook for Traders: Five Big Questions and Three Grey Swans.

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    Strap yourself in for key market questions that must be answered in 2026.
  • Q1 Outlook for Investors: “AI” party hangover needs discipline and diversification

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q1 Outlook for Investors: “AI” party hangover needs discipline and diversification

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

    2026 is a high-valuation, high-dispersion year: the AI story matures, policy becomes less predictabl...
  • Q4 Outlook for Investors: Diversify like it’s 2025 – don’t fall for déjà vu

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q4 Outlook for Investors: Diversify like it’s 2025 – don’t fall for déjà vu

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Q4 Outlook for Traders: The Fed is back in easing mode. Is this time different?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q4 Outlook for Traders: The Fed is back in easing mode. Is this time different?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    The Fed launched a new easing cycle in late Q3. Will this cycle now play out like 2000 or 2007?
  • Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q3 Investor Outlook: Beyond American shores – why diversification is your strongest ally

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity

    Quarterly Outlook

    Q3 Macro Outlook: Less chaos, and hopefully a bit more clarity

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    After the chaos of Q2, the quarter ahead should get a bit more clarity on how Trump 2.0 is impacting...
  • Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Upending the global order at blinding speed

    Quarterly Outlook

    Upending the global order at blinding speed

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ...
  • Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Quarterly Outlook

    Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

Disclaimer

The Saxo Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-hk/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)

None of the information contained here constitutes an offer to purchase or sell a financial instrument, or to make any investments. Saxo does not take into account your personal investment objectives or financial situation and makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the information nor for any loss arising from any investment made in reliance of this presentation. Any opinions made are subject to change and may be personal to the author. These may not necessarily reflect the opinion of Saxo or its affiliates.


Hong Kong

Contact Saxo

Hong Kong S.A.R
Hong Kong S.A.R

Saxo Capital Markets HK Limited (“Saxo”) is a company authorised and regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong. Saxo holds a Type 1 Regulated Activity (Dealing in Securities); Type 2 Regulated Activity (Dealing in Futures Contract); Type 3 Regulated Activity (Leveraged Foreign Exchange Trading); Type 4 Regulated Activity (Advising on Securities) and Type 9 Regulated Activity (Asset Management) licenses (CE No. AVD061). Registered address: 19th Floor, Shanghai Commercial Bank Tower, 12 Queen’s Road Central, Hong Kong.

Trading in financial instruments carries various risks, and is not suitable for all investors. Please seek expert advice, and always ensure that you fully understand these risks before trading. Trading in leveraged products may result in your losses exceeding your initial deposits. Saxo does not provide financial advice, any information available on this website is ‘general’ in nature and for informational purposes only. Saxo does not take into account an individual’s needs, objectives or financial situation. Please click here to view the relevant risk disclosure statements.

The Saxo trading platform has received numerous awards and recognition. For details of these awards and information on awards visit www.home.saxo/en-hk/about-us/awards.

The information or the products and services referred to on this site may be accessed worldwide, however is only intended for distribution to and use by recipients located in countries where such use does not constitute a violation of applicable legislation or regulations. Products and services offered on this website are not directed at, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity residing in the United States and Japan. Please click here to view our full disclaimer.

Apple, iPad and iPhone are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. AppStore is a service mark of Apple Inc. Android is a trademark of Google Inc.