"Food supply could become central in 2021" interview with L'Agéfi

Commodities 5 minutes to read

Ole Hansen

Head of Commodity Strategy

Summary:  This interview featured in a special report about commodities in L'Agéfi, the leading financial newspaper in French-speaking Switzerland on Friday, November 13.


Which commodity sector continues to be most affected by the current pandemic?

Clearly, the energy sector has suffered the most losses, which has continued to fall sharply since the beginning of the year, with WTI still down by almost 40% over this period. It is clear that the lockdown and the fact of being confined to one's own home has affected the demand for petroleum products for most of the year. Things had stabilised somewhat during the summer, but various governments in Europe and the US are imposing new lockdowns in the face of what appears to be a new wave of infections.

With the drop in demand, production has also decreased to meet the new environment. The downward pressure on energy prices has, however, continued due to increased production in some important regions. In Libya, for example, we have seen a significant recovery in production. This should probably push OPEC+ to abandon its plan to increase production from January 2021. A plan that the organisation had envisaged earlier in the summer, when crude oil prices had recovered significantly at the end of the first lockdown.

Is there any impact of the monetary and fiscal stimulus plans on the industry in general?

These plans are resulting in massive injections of liquidity into the financial system, resulting in higher inflation expectations. Investors may not expect inflation to return next year, but probably by 2022. The inflation risk has therefore led them to allocate large amounts of capital in precious metals in general and gold in particular, which is confirmed by the massive capital flows in financial products such as gold-backed exchange-traded funds (ETFs). This is therefore essentially a financial demand for these precious metals, making it the most successful segment so far this year. On the other hand, Chinese and Indian demand for physical gold remains relatively weak.

What about industrial metals, as these are more correlated with economic activity?

Its relative resilience may seem surprising given the overall magnitude of the economic shock caused by a pandemic such as covid-19. However, this is similar to what happened during the Great Financial Crisis of 2008, when Chinese demand was a major contributor to the recovery in industrial metals prices after Beijing introduced fiscal stimulus and various domestic investment incentive programmes. Copper is particularly sensitive to Chinese demand and posted an impressive performance for the year as a whole, despite continued high macroeconomic uncertainty.

Is there also resilience in agricultural commodities?

It is interesting to note that these are not as correlated to the pandemic as other commodity sectors and have seen a significant rise in prices this year. For the most important commodities, namely soybeans, wheat and maize, they have been on a downward trend over the past eight years. Excess supply, good harvests, increased production, high stock levels all combine to keep prices low. But in the last six months or so, a change in sentiment towards these food resources seems to have been at work.

China, which recently faced internal production problems due to a number of factors, is having to rebuild stocks, particularly in the animal feed sector. Chinese imports are mainly favouring farmers in Latin America and the United States. It should also be noted that some key regions, such as the Ukraine, Russia and Eastern Europe in general, are currently experiencing particularly dry weather, and parts of the US and Latin America are seeing their harvests disrupted by climatic factors, providing additional support to the prices of the three agricultural commodities mentioned above.

As food is a key commodity for which there is a permanent demand, are there geopolitical implications behind this price increase?

Strong and resilient demand for food can be a double-edged sword. Inflationary pressures may no longer be based solely on recently implemented monetary and fiscal stimulus policies, but also on rising prices of such critical goods as food commodities. The worst inflation is that caused by the rise in the prices of these specific commodities as it hurt those who can least afford it the most, especially in emerging market countries. I think we will have to keep a close eye on this sector in the coming months.

This is reminiscent of past economic crises triggered by popular movements in some emerging countries following food crises. No?

Yes, it does. This explains why countries such as Egypt, Pakistan and other seed-importing emerging countries have recently started to increase their purchases of seeds on the markets, in order to guard against a food crisis potentially capable of provoking popular protests such as we saw during the Arab Spring in 2010 and 2011. Admittedly, the current situation is not yet comparable to that which prevailed ten years ago. Nevertheless, when I see that it is now 17 degrees in Copenhagen at this time of year, I think that this is one of the highest temperatures ever recorded for this season. So if the upward trend in agricultural prices is expected to continue, food could become a central issue in 2021, whatever the outlook. In particular, we will be watching winter wheat production in Eastern Europe and soya and maize production in Argentina and Brazil.

But are there any losers in the agricultural commodities sector?

Consider the fact that restaurant attendance has dropped across the world. As a result, coffee and, to a lesser extent, cocoa, have seen their prices plummet. Coffee has lost about 20% since the beginning of the year. It is one of the big losers in this sector, as the entire population is unable to order their usual cup made from quality beans. To add to this downward pressure, it should be noted that production has remained at relatively high levels this year.

Disclaimer

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website is not intended to and does not change or expand on this. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-hk/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)

Saxo Capital Markets HK is a company authorised and regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong. Saxo Capital Markets HK Limited holds a Type 1 Regulated Activity (Dealing in securities); Type 2 Regulated Activity (Dealing in Futures Contract) and Type 3 Regulated Activity (Leveraged foreign exchange trading) licenses (CE No. AVD061). Registered address: 19th Floor, Shanghai Commercial Bank Tower, 12 Queen’s Road Central, Hong Kong

By clicking on certain links on this site, you are aware and agree to leave the website of Saxo Capital Markets, proceed on to the linked site managed by Saxo Group and where you will be subject to the terms of that linked site.

Apple, iPad and iPhone are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. AppStore is a service mark of Apple Inc.

Please note that the information on this site and any product and services we offer are not targeted at investors residing in the United States and Japan, and are not intended for distribution to, or use by any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation. Please click here to view our full disclaimer.